Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-18
Status INACTIVE
Type Workmans Comp. Adm. Appeal
Docket 44 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Mariestella Nwankwo
Defendant Cleveland Metropolitan School District|Bureau Of Workers' Compensation Stephanie Mccloud Ceo/administrator
Photo of Hon. William F B Vodrey

Judge

Hon. William F B Vodrey

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: NOTICE OF APPEAL WORK. COMP ADMIN APPEAL, COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59748784) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DOUGLAS S HUNTER [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59748783) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANGELIQUE M HARTZELL [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59748782) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JONATHAN T STENDER [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59748781) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JONATHAN T STENDER [email protected]
  6. BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, CASE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FINAL. OSJ. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. STIPULATION FILED BY D2 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION ATTORNEY JONATHAN T STENDER 0070563 DISMISSAL ENTRY
  8. CASE REFUND TO NAGER, ROMAINE & SCHNEIBERG CO., LPA
  9. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59024878) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DOUGLAS S HUNTER [email protected]
  10. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59024877) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANGELIQUE M HARTZELL [email protected]
  11. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59024876) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JONATHAN T STENDER [email protected]
  12. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59024875) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JONATHAN T STENDER [email protected]
  13. FINAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 12/17/2025 AT 02:30 PM IS CANCELLED.
  14. TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 02/02/2026 AT 10:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  15. ON 12/12/25 COURT MEDIATION NOTIFIED THE COURT THAT THIS CASE HAS BEEN RESOLVED. BY THIS JUDGMENT ENTRY, ALL FUTURE SCHEDULED EVENTS ARE CANCELLED AND THE CASE IS HEREBY REMOVED FROM THE COURT'S ACTIVE DOCKET. THE PARTIES ARE HEREBY GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE A STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE FILING OF THIS JOURNAL ENTRY, WHICH ADDRESSES ALL PENDING ISSUES AND THE ALLOCATION OF COURT COSTS. SHOULD THE PARTIES FAIL TO SUBMIT A STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY AS ORDERED, THIS COURT WILL DISMISS CASE WITH COSTS TO PLAINTIFF. COURT COSTS ASSESSED AS DIRECTED. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. MEDIATION HEARING HELD. THE PARTIES IN THE CAPTIONED CASE HAVE REACHED A SETTLEMENT AND AGREE TO SUBMIT THE DISMISSAL ENTRY WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  17. MEDIATION SET FOR 11/04/2025 AT 11:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  18. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE HELD ON 04/30/25. PARTIES APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. THIS CASE SHALL PROCEED AS FOLLOWS: ALL FACT DISCOVERY SHALL BE COMPLETED BY 09/25/25. PLAINTIFF EXPERT REPORT(S) SHALL BE DUE BY 09/25/25. DEFENDANT(S) EXPERT REPORT(S) SHALL BE DUE BY 11/25/25. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 12/17/25 AT 2:30PM. PLAINTIFF SHALL INITIATE THE CALL WITH ALL OTHER PARTIES, THEN CONTACT THE COURT AT (216) 443-8580 WHEN ALL PARTIES ARE ON THE LINE. TRIAL SET FOR 02/02/26 AT 10:00AM. THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS THE PARTIES TO FILE THE FOLLOWING AT LEAST 14 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL: (1) TRIAL BRIEFS; (2) WITNESS LISTS; (3) EXHIBIT LISTS; (4) JOINT JURY INSTRUCTIONS, JURY INTERROGATORIES, AND/OR JURY VERDICT FORMS; (5) JURY QUESTIONNAIRES SHOULD EITHER OR ALL PARTIES DESIRE TO UTILIZE SAME DURING VOIR DIRE; (6) STIPULATIONS; AND (7) A CONCISE, MUTUALLY AGREED-UPON STATEMENT OF THE CASE TO BE READ TO THE JURY AT THE OUTSET OF THE TRIAL. MOTIONS IN LIMINE, IF ANY, SHALL BE FILED AT LEAST 28 DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. ANY BRIEF IN OPPOSITION IS DUE 14 DAYS THEREAFTER. NO REPLY SHALL BE PERMITTED. CAPTIONED CASE IS HEREBY REFERRED TO MEDIATION WITH THE COURT MEDIATOR. THIS CASE SHALL BE MEDIATED IN NOVEMBER 2025. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 12/17/2025 AT 02:30 PM. (Notice Sent).
  20. TRIAL SET FOR 02/02/2026 AT 10:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  21. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 MARIESTELLA NWANKWO ATTORNEY DOUGLAS S HUNTER 0072815 REPORT OF PARTIES PLANNING MEETNG CIV. R. 26(F)
  22. NOTICE FILED BY D1 CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT ATTORNEY ANGELIQUE M HARTZELL 0071039 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANT-EMPLOYER'S RULE 26(B) INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  23. ANSWER FILED BY D1 CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT ATTORNEY ANGELIQUE M HARTZELL 0071039 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT-EMPLOYER, CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
  24. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY D2 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION ATTORNEY JONATHAN T STENDER 0070563 DISCLOSURE OF WITNESSES OF DEFENDANT, ADMINISTRATOR, OHIO BUREAU OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION
  25. NOTICE FILED BY D2 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION ATTORNEY JONATHAN T STENDER 0070563 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY TO PLAINTIFF OF DEFENDANT, ADMINISTRATOR, OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
  26. ANSWER FILED BY D2 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION ATTORNEY JONATHAN T STENDER 0070563 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT, ADMINISTRATOR, OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
  27. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 04/07/2025 17:01:48
  28. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT 04/07/2025 17:01:48
  29. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR HUNTER/DOUGLAS/S 04/07/2025 17:01:48
  30. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/30/2025 AT 09:40 AM. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 26, THE PARTIES SHALL MEET AND CONFER NO LATER THAN 21 DAYS BEFORE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THE PARTIES SHALL FILE A DISCOVERY PLAN WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THEIR CONFERENCE. PLAIINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL INITIATE THE CALL AND THEN CONTACT THE COURT AT (216) 443-8580 ONCE ALL PARTIES ARE ON THE LINE.
  31. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56418066 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/25/2025 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROCESSED BY COC 04/02/2025.
  32. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56418065 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/24/2025 CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT PROCESSED BY COC 04/02/2025.
  33. COMPLAINT W/ NO SUMS(56418066) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 30 W SPRING ST COLUMBUS, OH 43215-0000
  34. COMPLAINT W/ NO SUMS(56418065) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT 1111 SUPERIOR AVENUE EAST SUITE 1800 CLEVELAND, OH 44114
  35. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  36. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  37. JUDGE WILLIAM F. B. VODREY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  38. LEGAL RESEARCH
  39. LEGAL NEWS
  40. LEGAL AID
  41. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  42. COMPUTER FEE
  43. CLERK'S FEE
  44. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS S HUNTER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more