Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-18
Status INACTIVE
Type Divorce No Children
Docket 29 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Emily G Kaufman
Defendant Nathan T Sandler
Photo of Hon. Diane M Palos

Judge

Hon. Diane M Palos

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: SERVICE REQUEST, COMPLAINT, PETITION OR APPLICATION FOR
  2. COURT COST ASSESSED NATHAN T SANDLER BILL AMOUNT 110.11 PAID AMOUNT 89.89 AMOUNT DUE 20.22 NOTE: ANY ADDITIONAL COURT COST WILL BE BILLED AT A LATER DATE
  3. ABSTRACT TO STATE
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57094018) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: NATHAN T SANDLER [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57094017) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: EMILY G KAUFMAN [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57094016) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: LAURA WELLEN [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57094015) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: LAURA WELLEN [email protected]
  8. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION FILED
  9. FINAL DECREE TO COURT: 05/27/2025 DECREE FOR: BOTH PARTIES COSTS TO BE PAID BY: BOTH PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EQUALLY IT IS SO ORDERED THAT ALL RESTRAINING ORDERS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED BY THIS COURT ARE HEREBY DISSOLVED AND SET ASIDE. O.S.J. NOTICE ISSUED COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S) AND PLAINTIFF(S).
  10. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS FILED NOTICE OF FILING OF FULLY EXECUTED SEPARATION AGREEMENT
  11. HEARING NOTICE(S) SENT: EVENT: ATTORNEY CONFERENCE / VIDEO ZOOM DATE: 05/27/2025 AT 02:30 PM BEFORE MAGISTRATE MARIE M. RADY RECIPIENTS: PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY: LAURA M. WELLEN, EMAIL; L***LEN@W******AW.COM
  12. ATTORNEY CONFERENCE/VIDEO ZOOM SET FOR 05/27/2025 AT 02:30 BEFORE MAGISTRATE MARIE M. RADY.
  13. HEARING NOTICE(S) SENT: EVENT: ATTORNEY CONFERENCE / VIDEO ZOOM DATE: 05/27/2025 AT 02:30 PM BEFORE MAGISTRATE MARIE M. RADY RECIPIENTS: DEFENDANT: NATHAN SANDLER, ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE; 1500 DETROIT AVE. APT. 518 CLEVELAND, OH 44113-0000, PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY: LAURA M. WELLEN, EMAIL; L***LEN@W******AW.COM
  14. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FILED
  15. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56403624 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/22/2025 SANDLER/NATHAN /T PROCESSED BY COC 03/26/2025.
  16. SUMS COMPLAINT(56403624) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NATHAN T SANDLER 1500 DETROIT AVE. APT. 518 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  17. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  18. WRIT FEE
  19. MUTUAL RESTRAINING ORDER ISSUED TO PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 24
  20. MANDATORY DISCLOSURE ORDER ISSUED TO PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 14 REV 8-13-2018
  21. JUDGE DIANE M PALOS ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  22. LEGAL RESEARCH
  23. LEGAL NEWS
  24. LEGAL AID
  25. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FUND
  26. DIVORCE DECREE FEE FUND
  27. CLERK COMPUTER FEE
  28. CLERKS FEES
  29. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID LAURA WELLEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more