Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-18
Status ACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 109 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lakeview Loan Servicing, Llc
Defendant Lindsay Marta Hajostek|Unknown Spouse Of Lindsay Marta Hajostek, If Any, Name Unknown|Robert David Conrad|Unknown Successor Trustees Of The Cynthia L. Baumann Trust Dated May 1|Unknown Beneficiaries Of The Cynthia L. Baumann Trust Dated May 18, 20|United States Of America Acting By And Through Its Agency The Departme Nt Of Housing And Urban Development C/o The U.s. Attorney's Office|United States Of America C/o U.s. Attorney General|Cuyahoga County Treasurer
Photo of Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Judge

Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST, SERVICE REQUEST, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 05/11/2026 AT 10:45 AM. ANY CASE PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THE PARTY MOVING FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE. FAILURE OF THE MOVING PARTY TO ATTEND THE HEARING WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ANY AFFIRMATIVE CLAIMS FOR RELIEF. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  3. NOTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY BRANDON ELLIS 0099077 NOTICE OF FILING FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT
  4. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY BRANDON ELLIS 0099077 AFFIDAVIT OF ATTORNEY
  5. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY BRANDON ELLIS 0099077 AFFIDAVIT OF MILITARY STATUS
  6. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY BRANDON ELLIS 0099077 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF JUDGMENT
  7. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  8. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  9. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED IN PART. WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PLAINTIFF MUST COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S 1/29/26 DISPOSITIVE MOTION ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE COURT WILL NOT ENTERTAIN ANY FURTHER MOTIONS SEEKING ADDITIONAL TIME TO SUBMIT DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS IN THIS CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  11. THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL, FILED BY DAVID L. LASH (BAR NO. 0031571), COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT LINDSAY HAJOSTEK, IS GRANTED. DAVID L. LASH (BAR NO. 0031571) IS PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR DEFENDANT LINDSAY HAJOSTEK IN THIS CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. STIPULATION FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY STEPHEN R. FRANKS 0075345 STIPULATION OF LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC AND ROBERT DAVID CONRAD
  13. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
  14. TELEPHONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD BY MAGISTRATE ON 1/29/26. PETITIONER'S COUNSEL AND COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT ROBERT DAVID CONRAD APPEARED. COUNSEL ADVISED THE COURT THAT THE ISSUE INVOLVING PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT ROBERT DAVID CONRAD HAS BEEN RESOLVED AND WILL BE ADDRESSED BY A STIPULATION TO BE FILED BY THE PARTIES. FURTHER, PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO SUBMIT, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ANY DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS NECESSARY TO ADDRESS ITS CLAIMS, UPDATED TITLEWORK, AND ANY REQUIRED AFFIDAVITS. ANY ITEMS REQUIRED BY THIS ORDER MUST BE FILED AND DOCKETED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 01/29/2026 AT 02:00 PM BY TELEPHONE. TELEPHONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET BEFORE MAGISTRATE CHRISTOPHER E. DAY. ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD AND PRO SE DEFENDANTS MUST ATTEND THE CONFERENCE (CLIENT ATTENDANCE IS NOT REQUIRED); FAILURE OF A REQUIRED INDIVIDUAL TO ATTEND THE CONFERENCE WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ANY AFFIRMATIVE CLAIMS FOR RELIEF. ANY INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED TO ATTEND THE CONFERENCE MUST CALL (216) 443-8505 AT LEAST FIFTEEN (15) MINUTES PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE, IN ORDER TO OBTAIN LOGIN INFORMATION. THE MAGISTRATE WILL SET A CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE DURING THE CONFERENCE. THIS CONFERENCE MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY BY PHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. ANSWER FILED BY D3 ROBERT DAVID CONRAD ATTORNEY EDWARD F. HERMAN 0086598 ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  17. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REACTIVATE CASE IS GRANTED. THE STAY ENTERED BY THE COURT ON 10/2/25, IS VACATED. FURTHER, DEFENDANT ROBERT DAVID CONRAD'S MOTION TO IN ABEYANCE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DEEMED A MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD AND IS GRANTED. WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, THE DEFENDANT MAY SUBMIT HIS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT. THE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE MUST BE FILED AND DOCKETED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT. THE CASE IS REINSTATED TO THE ACTIVE DOCKET. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. POST JUDGMENT MOTION $30 . BRANDON ELLIS (0099077) MOTION TO REACTIVATE
  19. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID BRANDON ELLIS
  20. ANSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ACTING BY AND THROUGH ITS AGENCY THE DEPARTME(D6) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(D7) ATTORNEY JAMES R. BENNETT 0071663 ANSWER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  21. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58309863) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVE. NW WASHINGTON, DC 20530
  22. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58309860) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF LINDSAY MARTA HAJOSTEK, IF ANY, NAME UNKNOWN 8210 SALISBURY DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  23. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58309859) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: EDWARD F. HERMAN [email protected]
  24. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58309858) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: EDWARD F. HERMAN [email protected]
  25. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58309857) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRANDON ELLIS [email protected]
  26. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58309856) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRANDON ELLIS [email protected]
  27. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58309855) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JAMES R. BENNETT [email protected]
  28. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58309854) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JAMES R. BENNETT [email protected]
  29. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58309853) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRIAN E CHAPMAN [email protected]
  30. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58309852) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRIAN E CHAPMAN [email protected]
  31. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58309851) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: TERRENCE JONES [email protected]
  32. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58309850) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID L LASH [email protected]
  33. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY CASE IS GRANTED. ALL PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE, AND ANY CURRENTLY-PENDING MOTIONS, WILL BE HELD IN ABEYANCE PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE PARTIES' LOSS MITIGATION EFFORTS. THIS CASE MAY BE RETURNED TO THE COURT'S ACTIVE DOCKET ONLY UPON MOTION. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  34. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION TO HOLD IN ABEYANCE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT
  35. MOTION FILED FOR P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC BRANDON ELLIS 0099077 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY CASE
  36. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS DEEMED FILED AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. PLAINTIFF MUST PERFECT SERVICE OF ITS AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E) OR THE AMENDED COMPLAINT WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER, AS PLAINTIFF AS FILED AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS CASE, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 6/16/25, IS DENIED AS MOOT. NOTICE ISSUED
  37. MOTION FILED FOR P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC BRANDON ELLIS 0099077 MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
  38. PLAINTIFF'S STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED. ON OR BEFORE 9/3/25, PLAINTIFF MUST COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S 7/23/25 ORDER TO SUBMIT A MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT OR TO ADVISE THE COURT THAT IT WILL NOT SEEK PERSONAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT ROBERT DAVID CONRAD. NOTICE ISSUED
  39. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  40. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING HELD BY MAGISTRATE ON 7/23/25. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT LINDSAY MARTA HAJOSTEK, AND COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT ROBERT DAVID CONRAD ATTENDED. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL ORALLY MOVED THE COURT FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO WITHDRAW ITS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, IN ORDER TO ADDRESS AN ISSUE WITH ITS COMPLAINT. AS LOC.R. 8(C) REQUIRES A COPY OF THE PROPOSED AMENDED PLEADING TO ACCOMPANY ANY MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, PLAINTIFF'S ORAL MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IS PROCEDURALLY INCORRECT. PLAINTIFF IS, HOWEVER, GRANTED LEAVE OF FOURTEEN (14) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO SUBMIT A WRITTEN MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT THAT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF LOC.R. 8(C). THE MOTION MUST BE FILED AND DOCKETED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT. FURTHER, THE MAGISTRATE WILL HOLD PLAINTIFF'S ORAL MOTION TO WITHDRAW ITS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN ABEYANCE PENDING THE COURT'S RULING ON ANY MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT THAT MAY BE FILED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  41. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED D3 ROBERT DAVID CONRAD EDWARD F. HERMAN 0086598. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  42. ANSWER FILED BY D1 LINDSAY MARTA HAJOSTEK ATTORNEY DAVID L LASH 0031571 ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF DEFENDANT, LINDSAY HAJOSTEK TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  43. NOTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY BRANDON ELLIS 0099077 NOTICE OF HEARING
  44. DEFENDANT LINDSAY HAJOSTEK'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART. ON OR BEFORE 7/2/25, THE DEFENDANT MAY SUBMIT A RESPONSIVE PLEADING IN THIS CASE. THE RESPONSIVE PLEADING MUST BE FILED AND DOCKETED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT. NOTICE ISSUED
  45. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 07/23/2025 AT 11:30 AM. ANY CASE PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THE PARTY MOVING FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE. FAILURE OF THE MOVING PARTY TO ATTEND THE HEARING WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ANY AFFIRMATIVE CLAIMS FOR RELIEF. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  46. NOTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY BRANDON ELLIS 0099077 NOTICE OF FILING FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT
  47. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY BRANDON ELLIS 0099077 AFFIDAVIT OF ATTORNEY
  48. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY BRANDON ELLIS 0099077 AFFIDAVIT OF MILITARY STATUS
  49. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY BRANDON ELLIS 0099077 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF JUDGMENT
  50. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  51. ANSWER FILED BY D6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ACTING BY AND THROUGH ITS AGENCY THE DEPARTME ATTORNEY JAMES R. BENNETT 0071663 ANSWER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  52. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  53. A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS THAT PLAINTIFF HAS PERFECTED SERVICE ON ALL DEFENDANTS. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO SUBMIT, WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ANY DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS NECESSARY TO PROSECUTE THE CASE, UPDATED TITLEWORK, AND ANY NECESSARY AFFIDAVITS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  54. 56426279 ON 03/25/2025 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF LINDSAY MARTA HAJOSTEK, IF ANY, NAME UNKNOWN BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  55. 56426277 ON 03/25/2025 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED HAJOSTEK/LINDSAY /MARTA BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  56. 56426281 ON 04/29/2025 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED CONRAD/ROBERT /DAVID BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  57. LEGAL NEWS ABSTRACT
  58. PROOF OF PUBLICATION FILED $605.05 - LEGAL NEWS FEE $250.00
  59. PRE-PAID PORTION OF SERVICE PUBLICATION FEE $355.05
  60. ANSWER FILED BY D8 CUYAHOGA COUNTY TREASURER ATTORNEY TERRENCE JONES 0039003 CUYAHOGA COUNTY TREASURER
  61. NOTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY BRIAN E CHAPMAN 0039826 NOTICE OF FILING PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  62. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56426283 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/31/2025 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PROCESSED BY COC 04/09/2025.
  63. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID BRANDON ELLIS
  64. AFFIDAVIT SERVICE BY PUBLICATION, FORECLOSURE $250 AFFIDAVIT FOR SERVICE BY PUBLICATION
  65. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56426282 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/24/2025 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ACTING BY AND THROUGH ITS AGENCY THE DEPARTME PROCESSED BY COC 04/02/2025.
  66. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56426278 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/25/2025 UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF LINDSAY MARTA HAJOSTEK, IF ANY, NAME UNKNOWN PROCESSED BY COC 04/02/2025.
  67. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56426276 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/25/2025 HAJOSTEK/LINDSAY /MARTA PROCESSED BY COC 04/02/2025.
  68. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56426280 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/25/2025 CONRAD/ROBERT /DAVID PROCESSED BY COC 04/02/2025.
  69. CLERK ISSUED VIA HAND DELIVERY RETURNED 03/28/2025 - CUYAHOGA COUNTY TREASURER - COMPLETED 03/28/2025 0.00
  70. SUMS COMPLAINT(56426283) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVE. NW WASHINGTON, DC 20530
  71. SUMS COMPLAINT(56426282) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ACTING BY AND THROUGH ITS AGENCY THE DEPARTME 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  72. SUMS COMPLAINT(56426280) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ROBERT DAVID CONRAD 8210 SALISBURY DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  73. SUMS COMPLAINT(56426278) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF LINDSAY MARTA HAJOSTEK, IF ANY, NAME UNKNOWN 8210 SALISBURY DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  74. SUMS COMPLAINT(56426276) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: LINDSAY MARTA HAJOSTEK 8210 SALISBURY DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  75. SUMS COMPLAINT(56426284) SENT BY CLERK ISSUED VIA HAND DELIVERY. TO: CUYAHOGA COUNTY TREASURER 2079 E 9TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44115
  76. SUMS COMPLAINT(56426281) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: ROBERT DAVID CONRAD 8210 SALISBURY DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  77. SUMS COMPLAINT(56426279) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF LINDSAY MARTA HAJOSTEK, IF ANY, NAME UNKNOWN 8210 SALISBURY DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  78. SUMS COMPLAINT(56426277) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: LINDSAY MARTA HAJOSTEK 8210 SALISBURY DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  79. A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS PLAINTIFF FILED A COMPLAINT ON 3/18/25, AND SERVICE HAS NOT YET BEEN PERFECTED. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO PERFECT SERVICE PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E), OR THE PLEADING WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  80. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  81. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  82. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  83. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  84. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  85. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  86. WRIT FEE
  87. WRIT FEE
  88. WRIT FEE
  89. WRIT FEE
  90. WRIT FEE
  91. WRIT FEE
  92. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  93. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  94. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  95. WRIT FEE
  96. WRIT FEE
  97. WRIT FEE
  98. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  99. MAGISTRATE CHRISTOPHER DAY ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  100. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  101. JUDGE JOHN P O'DONNELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  102. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  103. LEGAL RESEARCH
  104. LEGAL NEWS
  105. LEGAL AID
  106. COMPUTER FEE
  107. CLERK'S FEE
  108. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID BRIAN E CHAPMAN
  109. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID BRIAN E CHAPMAN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more