Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Wayne County(Ohio)

Court

Wayne County(Ohio)

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-27
Status CLOSED
Type Other Civil
Docket 50 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Midland Credit Management Inc
Defendant Midland Credit Management Inc|$35.00
Photo of Hon. VANSICKLE TIMOTHY R

Judge

Hon. VANSICKLE TIMOTHY R

Wayne County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED 02/27/2025 CASE NUMBER 2025 CVC-H 000077
  2. ANSWER OF EMPLOYER RETURNED "DEFENDANT HAD INSUFFICIENT WAGES TO GARNISH"
  3. ANSWER OF EMPLOYER RETURNED "DEFENDANT HAD INSUFFICIENT WAGES TO GARNISH"
  4. ANSWER OF EMPLOYER RETURNED "DEFENDANT HAD INSUFFICIENT WAGES TO GARNISH"
  5. ANSWER OF EMPLOYER RETURNED "DEFENDANT HAD INSUFFICIENT WAGES TO GARNISH"
  6. ANSWER OF EMPLOYER RETURNED "DEFENDANT HAD INSUFFICIENT WAGES TO GARNISH"
  7. ANSWER OF EMPLOYER RETURNED "DEFENDANT HAD INSUFFICIENT WAGES TO GARNISH"
  8. ANSWER OF EMPLOYER RETURNED "DEFENDANT HAD INSUFFICIENT WAGES TO GARNISH"
  9. ANSWER OF EMPLOYER RETURNED "DEFENDANT HAD INSUFFICIENT WAGES TO GARNISH"
  10. ANSWER OF EMPLOYER RETURNED "DEFENDANT HAD INSUFFICIENT WAGES TO GARNISH"
  11. ANSWER OF EMPLOYER RETURNED "DEFENDANT HAD INSUFFICIENT WAGES TO GARNISH"
  12. POUNDAGE FEE ASSESSED $35.43
  13. MONEY RECEIVED ON GARNISHMENT FEE ASSESSED $1771.90
  14. PAYMENT $12.15 RECEIPT #2025023871
  15. ANSWER OF EMPLOYER FILED
  16. ELECTRONIC CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FOR: WALMART INC
  17. CERT MAIL SENT FEE ASSESSED $9.15
  18. ORDER OF GARNISHMENT GRANTED FEE ASSESSED $3.00
  19. ORDER OF GARNISHMENT GRANTED CC: ATTY & DEFT (REG MAIL) WALMART & DEFT (THRU EMPLOYER) CERT MAIL
  20. REQUEST FOR HEARING FORM SENT
  21. NOTICE TO JUDGMENT DEBTOR
  22. FINAL REPORT AND ANSWER OF GARNISHEE
  23. INTERIM REPORT (FORM)
  24. ANSWER FROM EMPLOYER (FORM)
  25. AFFIDAVIT AND NOTICE OF GARNISHMENT
  26. NOTICE OF COURT PROCEEDINGS TO COLLECT DEBT
  27. PAYMENT $60.00 RECEIPT #2025022209
  28. DEP/ GARN, JDGMT DEBTOR EXAM, EXECUTION FEE ASSESSED $25.00
  29. GARN, JDGMT DEBTOR EXAM, EXECUTION FEE ASSESSED $35.00
  30. PAYMENT $15.95 RECEIPT #2025015889
  31. ELECTRONIC SERVICE TO RECIPIENTS: PAVLOVIC, NEVENKA ATTACHMENT COUNT: 1 SENT DOCKET DESCRIPTIONS: CPJECR-7/18/2025
  32. JUDGMENT ENTRY: FEE ASSESSED $3.00
  33. DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTRY CC: PAVLOVIC (EMAIL) DEFT (REG MAIL)
  34. CERTIFICATION AS TO MILITARY STATUS
  35. AFFIDAVIT OF BRENDA BITTMAN
  36. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  37. ADDITIONAL POSTAGE CHARGES FEE ASSESSED $1.51
  38. REGULAR MAIL SENT
  39. FAILURE OF SERVICE ON SHANNON COOK
  40. CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED
  41. SUMMONS ISSUED
  42. CERT MAIL SENT FEE ASSESSED $8.44
  43. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL FEE ASSESSED $3.00
  44. PAYMENT $313.00 RECEIPT #2025004230
  45. JUDGE VANSICKLE, TIMOTHY R.: ASSIGNED
  46. WAYNE COUNTY CASE#: 2025 CVC 000077 M
  47. CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED FEE ASSESSED $277.00
  48. CIVIL DEPOSIT FEE ASSESSED $36.00
  49. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  50. EXHIBITS A

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more