Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR HERMAN/AMY/K. 02/25/2025 17:02:07
- CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR LEONE/DENIO/A 02/25/2025 17:02:07
- MC BY PHONE SET FOR 03/25/2025 AT 10:30 AM. ALL PARTIES COUNSELS ARE TO CALL THE CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 716-427-1108 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 130004# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR FOR THIS CMC WILL RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES OF THE DATE, TIME AND CONFERENCE CALL DIRECTIONS. ANY ATTORNEY OR UNREPRESENTED PARTY WHO IS NOT AVAILABLE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED HIS/HER PARTICIPATION AND TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE CASE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. PRIOR TO THE CMC, PARTIES MUST EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 26(B)(3) AND DRAFT A PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 26(F). COUNSEL SHALL FILE WITH THE COURT THE PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN AND NOTICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE CMC. IF THE PARTIES ARE UNABLE TO CONFER, PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE EVIDENCE WITH THE COURT OF EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT ANY COURT SCHEDULED EVENT IN THE FUTURE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT RENDERED AGAINST DEFENDANT. SO ORDERED.
- NSWER FILED BY D1 PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY ATTORNEY AMY K. HERMAN 0092204 ANSWER OF PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
- SPS RECEIPT NO. 55910340 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/03/2025 PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY PROCESSED BY COC 02/12/2025.
- UMS COMPLAINT(55910340) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY 4400 EASTON COMMONS, STE. 125 COLUMBUS, OH 43219
- UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
- RIT FEE
- UDGE JEFFREY P SAFFOLD ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
- EGAL RESEARCH
- EGAL NEWS
- EGAL AID
- OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
- OMPUTER FEE
- LERK'S FEE
- EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DENIO A LEONE
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In