Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-13
Type Divorce
Docket 35 entries
Disposition remov
Photo of Hon. Luton John David

Judge

Hon. Luton John David

Wagoner County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FOR DIVORCE
  2. OCIS FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND FEE
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. ISSUE (1) SUMMONS
  14. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  15. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  16. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  17. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  18. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  19. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  20. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  21. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  22. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  23. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  24. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  25. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  26. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  27. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE & CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC SERVICE
  28. UCCJEA AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 43 O.S.& 551-209
  29. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS
  30. ORDER SETTING HEARING
  31. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE - NIKO WRIGHT SERVED 2/13/25
  32. DS/MIN 3-10-25 DIV DKT LUTON: PET P W/ATTY COURTNEY DRISKELL. RESP P W/ ATTY LATISHA PERKINS. MATTER COMES ON FOR TEMPORARY HEARING. MS. PERKINS HAS ANSWERED VIA CERTIFIED MAIL; CERT. MAIL WAS SIGNED FOR BY CLERKS OFFICE BUT NOT IN THE COURT FILE. RESP'S ATTY ALLOWED TO MAIL ALIAS RESPONSE/ANSWER OUT OF TIME (NO OBJECTION FROM PET). PARITES ANNOUNCE READY FOR TEMPORARY ORDER HEARING. WITS SWORN [PET (DIRECT/CROSS & RE-DIRECT) PET REST], [RESP (DIRECT/CROSS & RE-DIRECT) RESP' NO. 1 & 2 ADMITTED W/OUT OBJECTION (EXHIBITS RETURNED TO RESP'S COUNSEL), RESP REST] TESTIMONY TAKEN, ARUGMENTS HEARD. COURT FINDS: RESP'S ATTY ORALLY REQUEST EMERGENCY CUSTODY OF THE PARTIES MINOR CHILDREN BASED ON PET'S TESTIMONY TODAY. THE COURT DENIES RESP ATTY REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY CUSTODY. TEMP. CUSTODY OF T.R.W. (2020) & S.H.W. (2023) AWARDED TO: THE PARTIES JOINTLY WITH EACH PARTY TO RECIEVE 50/50 TIME WITH THE PARTIES MINOR CHILDREN ON A 2-2-3 SCHEDULE. NEITHER PARTY PRIMARY. TEMP. VISITATION: PARTIES TO WORK OUT THE DATES/TIMES OF THE 2-2-3 SCHEDULE. 4 HR RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL IS ORDERED FOR BOTH PARTIES EXCHANGES: TO TAKE PLACE AT THE CLOSEST QUICK TRIP OR PUBLIC AREA WITH CAMERAS, IF PARTIES CAN'T AGREE SHALL BE A QUICK TRIP PHONE CALLS: LIBERAL TELEPHONE CALL SHALL BE ENJOYED FOR THE NON-CUSTODIAL PARENT. THE NON- CUSTODIAL PARENT SHALL/ MAY CALL ONE (1) TIME A DAY FROM 6:30 P.M.-7:30 P.M. TEMP. CHILD SUPPORT: PURSUANT TO OKLAHOMA CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES. PET TO BE SET AT: $15/HR (40HRS/WK). RESP TO BE SET AT: $8,315.00 (GROSS)MONTHLY. RESP SHALL RECEIVE IMPUTED CREDIT FOR MAINTAINING HEALTH INSURANCE MINOR CHILDREN. TEMP. ALIMONY: $1800.00 MONTHLY ((-) MINUS THE AMOUNT OF CHILD SUPPORT THAT IS CALCULATED SUPRA) THIS PAYMENT IS SATISIFIED BY MAKING THE MORTAGE. 2024 TAXES: PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO FILE EXTENSION AND ADDRESS THIS ISSUE AT MEDIATION/FINAL TRIAL. TEMP. DEBT(S) DIVISION (UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT): 1. CABLE INTERNET (WINDSTREAM): PET; DEBT THEREON 2. 2017 JEEP INSURANCE: RESP; DEBT THEREON 3. SCHOOL LUNCHES: PET; DEBT THEREON 4. BASS PRO CREDIT CARD: RESP; DEBT THEREON (ONLY OBLIGATED TO THE MINIMUM) 5. AMERICAN EXPRESS (HILTON): RESP; DEBT THEREON (ONLY OBLIGATED TO THE MINIMUM) 6. CELL PHONE BILL FOR PET: PET; DEBT THEREON 7. UTILITIES FOR THE MARITAL HOME: PET; DEBT THEREON 8. RESP'S TRUCK AND INSURANCE: RESP; WITH DEBT THEREON TEMP. PROPERTY DIVISION (UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT): 1. RESP ALLOWED TO RETRIEVE HIS GUNS/GUNSAFE/AMMUNITION AND WORK ITEMS STORED IN THE MARITAL HOME. 2. MARITAL HOME: PET TO HAVE POSSESSION 3. RESP TO RECEIVE THE EXTRA CHILDREN'S BED AT THE MARITAL HOME. RESPONDENT TO BE REMOVED FROM THE RING DOORBELL CAMERA ACCOUNT JOPC TO BE ENTERED BY THE PARTIES AND PARENTS ADMONISHED TO KEEP THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILDREN & FROM DISCUSSING THE DIVORCE ACTION WITH THE MINOR CHILDREN. RESP WILL PAY BILLS FOR MARCH. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  33. COURT ORDER
  34. JUDICIAL ORDER FOR PROPER CONDUCT OF PARENTS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more