Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- PETITION
- LAW LIBRARY ASSESSMENT
- DISPUTE MEDIATION ASSESSMENT
- OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 7/1/04
- LENGTHY TRIAL FUND FEE
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
- 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
- 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- ISSUING SUMMONS AND NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC TEMPORARY INJUNCTION TO ATTORNEY
- RETURN OF SERVICE - PERSONALLY SERVED BARBARA DEVER ON 08/19/24 BY PS JAY PRICE
- RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE AND COUNTERCLAIM FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
- CM: APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER BEFORE COURT; PARTIES AGREE TO WIT: 1. DEFENDANT TO HAVE EXCLUSIVE POSSESSION OF MARITAL RESIDENCE; 2. EACH PARTY TO RECEIVE SEPERATE PROPERTY; 3. EACH PARTY TO RETAIN PROPERTY IN THEIR POSSESSION; 4. PLAINTIFF AGREES DEFENDANT REMOVE PLAINTIFF FROM AUTO INSURANCE 10/27/24; 5. ISSUE OF 2011 CHEVROLET IMPALA RESERVED FOR HEARING ON MERITS
- CM: PARTIES SUBMIT AGREED TEMPORARY ORDERS; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 02/18/25 AT 9:30AM ON THE DOMESTIC DOCKET
- RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR SETTING
- ORDER SETTING - 10/01/24 AT 9:30AM
- DOMESTIC RELATIONS SCHEUDLING ORDER - 02/18/25 AT 9:30AM
- PETITIONER'S ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM
- CM: COURTHOUSE WAS CLOSED DUE TO INCLEMENT WEATHER; CASE RESET TO 02/25/25 AT 9:30AM ON THE DOMESTIC DOCKET
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In