Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-27
Type Ap Tran By Order Post Opinion
Docket 26 entries
Disposition disposed

Parties

Plaintiff Missouri Dept Of Corrections, Di Of Probation & Parole|Taulbee, Nicolas|Rothermich, Abbie|Catharine Sue Carter Personal Representatie Of Estate Of Da|Nielsen, Christina Jeanette
Defendant Missouri Dept Of Corrections, Div Of Probation & Parole|Taulbee, Nicolas|Catharine Sue Carter Personal Representative Of Estate Of Da|Nielsen, Christina Jeanette|Lunceford, David Andrew|Baldwin, Charles Kevin

Docket Entries

  2. ustained ORDER ISSUED: APPELLANT-RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME SUSTAINED. APPELLANT-RESPONDENT'S SUBSTITUTE BRIEF IS DUE ON OR BEFORE MARCH 24, 2025. Associated Entries: 02/27/2025 - Mot Ext Time to File Brief +
  4. ot Ext Time to File Brief Appellant-Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: CHRISTINA JEANETTE NIELSEN On Behalf Of: CATHARINE SUE CARTER PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF ESTATE OF DA Associated Entries: 02/28/2025 - Sustained +
  5. ecord on Appeal Transferred CLERK, MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS, WESTERN DISTRICT, TRANSFERRED THE ENTIRE CASE FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF SAID COURT DATED FEBRUARY 11, 2025. ***COUNSEL MAY WISH TO REVIEW RULE 83.08.***
  6. o Filing Fee Due NO FILING FEE DUE.
  8. ot Ext Time to File Brief Appellant-Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time. Filed By: CHRISTINA JEANETTE NIELSEN On Behalf Of: CATHARINE SUE CARTER PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF ESTATE OF DA Associated Entries: 05/15/2025 - Sustained +
  9. ase Docketed CAUSE DOCKETED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON JUNE 24, 2025 AT 9:00 A.M. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCKET LETTER, DOCKET AND NOTICE TO COUNSEL. COUNSEL ARGUING BEFORE THE COURT MUST SIGN IN WITH THE DEPUTY CLERK IN THE COURTROOM NO LATER THAN 8:45 A.M.
  11. ppendix Filed Appendix to Respondents/Appellants Brief ; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: NICOLAS TAULBEE On Behalf Of: MISSOURI DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, DIV OF PROBATION & PAROLE
  12. ub Resp/Cross Appellants Brf Respondents/Appellants Substitute Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: NICOLAS TAULBEE
  14. lerk Remark CAUSE IS REMOVED FROM THE MAY 13, 2025 DOCKET AND WILL BE RESCHEDULED AT A FUTURE DATE.
  15. ustained in Part ORDER ISSUED: RESPONDENT-APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUBSTITUTE BRIEF SUSTAINED IN PART. RESPONDENT-APPELLANT'S SUBSTITUTE BRIEF IS NOW DUE ON OR BEFORE APRIL 29, 2025. Associated Entries: 04/09/2025 - Mot Ext Time to File Brief +
  16. ot Ext Time to File Brief Respondent-Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief. Filed By: NICOLAS TAULBEE On Behalf Of: MISSOURI DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, DIV OF PROBATION & PAROLE Associated Entries: 04/09/2025 - Sustained in Part +
  17. lerk Remark CAUSE DOCKETED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON TUESDAY, MAY 13, 2025 AT 9:00 A.M. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCKET LETTER, DOCKET AND NOTICE TO COUNSEL. COUNSEL ARGUING BEFORE THE COURT MUST SIGN IN WITH THE DEPUTY CLERK IN THE COURTROOM NO LATER THAN 8:45 A.M. ***THIS CASE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE MAY 13, 2025 DOCKET AND WILL BE RESCHEDULED AT A FUTURE DATE.***
  18. iling Appellant-Respondent's Supplemental Certificate of Service; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: CHRISTINA JEANETTE NIELSEN On Behalf Of: CATHARINE SUE CARTER PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF ESTATE OF DA
  19. ppendix Filed Appendix to Appellant-Respondent's Substitute Brief. Filed By: CHRISTINA JEANETTE NIELSEN On Behalf Of: CATHARINE SUE CARTER PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF ESTATE OF DA
  20. ub Initial Appellants Brief Appellant-Respondent's Substitute Brief. Filed By: CHRISTINA JEANETTE NIELSEN
  21. ustained ORDER ISSUED: APPELLANT-RESPONDENT'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME SUSTAINED. APPELLANT-RESPONDENT'S SUBSTITUTE BRIEF IS DUE ON OR BEFORE MARCH 25, 2025. Associated Entries: 03/25/2025 - Motion for Extension of Time +
  22. otion for Extension of Time Appellant-Respondent's Second Motion for Extension of Time. Filed By: CHRISTINA JEANETTE NIELSEN On Behalf Of: CATHARINE SUE CARTER PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF ESTATE OF DA Associated Entries: 03/25/2025 - Sustained +
  23. ustained ORDER ISSUED: APPELLANT-RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME SUSTAINED. APPELLANT-RESPONDENT'S SUBSTITUTE BRIEF IS DUE ON OR BEFORE MARCH 24, 2025. Associated Entries: 02/27/2025 - Mot Ext Time to File Brief +
  24. ot Ext Time to File Brief Appellant-Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: CHRISTINA JEANETTE NIELSEN On Behalf Of: CATHARINE SUE CARTER PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF ESTATE OF DA Associated Entries: 02/28/2025 - Sustained +
  25. ecord on Appeal Transferred CLERK, MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS, WESTERN DISTRICT, TRANSFERRED THE ENTIRE CASE FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF SAID COURT DATED FEBRUARY 11, 2025. ***COUNSEL MAY WISH TO REVIEW RULE 83.08.***
  26. o Filing Fee Due NO FILING FEE DUE.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more