Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-19
Status INACTIVE
Type Miscellaneous Other
Docket 23 entries

Parties

Plaintiff University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Defendant Cindy Farley
Photo of Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Judge

Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57443915) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CINDY FARLEY 3283 REGENT RD CLEVELAND, OH 44127
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57443914) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JOHN F GARSWOOD [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57443913) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JOHN F GARSWOOD [email protected]
  5. THIS CASE WAS CALLED FOR A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON JULY 3, 2025, AS SCHEDULED. THE DEFENDANT APPEARED PRO SE. THE PLAINTIFF, HOWEVER, FAILED TO APPEAR FOR THE SECOND TIME. AS A RESULT, THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. SUMS COMPLAINT(56917075) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CINDY FARLEY 3283 REGENT RD CLEVELAND, OH 44127 ANSWER DATE: 06/05/2025
  7. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  8. WRIT FEE
  9. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONSSERVICE
  10. THIS CASE WAS CALLED FOR A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON APRIL 22, 2025, AS SCHEDULED. ANOTHER PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SET AS SHOWN BELOW. IF THE PLAINTIFF EITHER (1) FAILS TO PERFECT SERVICE ON THE DEFENDANT BY JULY 3, 2025, OR (2) FAILS AGAIN TO APPEAR FOR A SCHEDULED PRETRIAL, THEN THE COMPLAINT WILL BE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 07/03/2025 AT 10:00 AM. COURTROOM 18-D. THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD AS A DEFAULT HEARING IN THE EVENT THE DEFENDANT IS IN DEFAULT OF AN ANSWER AND THE PLAINTIFF FILES A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST HER NO LATER THAN JUNE 19, 2025. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56206034 RETURNED 3/24/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT FARLEY/CINDY/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  12. SUMS COMPLAINT(56206034) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CINDY FARLEY 3283 REGENT RD CLEVELAND, OH 44127
  13. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  14. WRIT FEE
  15. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 04/22/2025 AT 11:30 AM. COURTROOM 18-D. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. JUDGE JOHN P O'DONNELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  17. LEGAL RESEARCH
  18. LEGAL NEWS
  19. LEGAL AID
  20. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  21. COMPUTER FEE
  22. CLERK'S FEE
  23. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JOHN F GARSWOOD

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more