Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Danbury County

Court

Danbury County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-11
Type C 00 Contracts Construction All Other
Docket 31 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Ferrandino Enterprises, Llc
Defendant Dmitri Mirovitski Individually And As Trustee Of The Mt Management Trust U/a/d April 27, 2022|Olga Troitskaya Individually And As Trustee Of The Mt Management Trust U/a/d April 27, 2022

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ORDER RESULT: Order 12/29/2025 HON KRISTIN CONNORS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. RETURN OF SERVICE
  6. ORDER RESULT: Order 3/5/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS Watermark
  7. ORDER RESULT: Order 3/5/2025 HON ROBERT GENUARIO
  8. TRANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK
  9. TRANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY
  10. REQUEST TO REVISE
  11. CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE Corrected Certification of Service of Dkt No. 105.00
  12. OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Request to Revise Doc. 105.00 RESULT: Sustained 4/29/2025 HON KRISTIN CONNORS
  13. ORDER RESULT: Sustained 4/29/2025 HON KRISTIN CONNORS
  14. REVISED COMPLAINT Plaintiff's Revised Complaint dated April 15, 2025
  15. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE AND COUNTERCLAIM
  16. REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE AND ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM
  17. AGREEMENT Consent to the Plaintiff Filing an Amended Reply to Special Defenses and Answer to CounterClaims
  18. AMENDED REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE Amended Reply to SD & Answer to CC with S.D. (Redline of Amended Pleading attached)
  19. REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE Reply to Special Defenses to Counterclaim
  20. MOTION FOR COMMISSION FOR DEPOSITION RESULT: Withdrawn 8/7/2025 BY THE DEFENDANT Last Updated: Result Information - 08/07/2025
  21. ORDER RESULT: Order 8/5/2025 HON KRISTIN CONNORS
  22. MOTION FOR COMMISSION FOR DEPOSITION Raphael Porcelain - slight revision to Schedule A RESULT: Order 8/22/2025 HON KRISTIN CONNORS
  23. ORDER RESULT: Order 8/22/2025 HON KRISTIN CONNORS
  24. SCHEDULING ORDER Scheduling Order Agreed to by all Parties RESULT: Order 9/5/2025 HON KRISTIN CONNORS
  25. ORDER RESULT: Order 9/5/2025 HON KRISTIN CONNORS
  26. CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  27. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION
  28. STIPULATION Stipulation Extending Both Parties Time to Serve Responses to Discovery Requests to Nov. 5, 2025
  29. OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 The Objection of Ferrandino Enterprises, LLC to Certain Interrogatories & Requests for Production
  30. OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10
  31. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order (Doc. 116.00) & Pretrial/Trial Dates (Doc. 116.05) RESULT: Order 12/29/2025 HON KRISTIN CONNORS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more