Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-04
Status INACTIVE
Type Quiet Title
Docket 21 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Kenneth Kelber
Defendant Mari M Brickman
Photo of Hon. Kelly Ann Gallagher

Judge

Hon. Kelly Ann Gallagher

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57025762) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MARGIE T KARL [email protected]
  3. A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE MAGISTRATE'S APRIL 17, 2025, MAGISTRATE'S ORDER AS WELL LOCAL RULE 24.0(A). AS PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO COMPLY, THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF'S COSTS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH BOTH A COURT ORDER AND LOCAL RULE 24.0(A). FINAL. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  4. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 05/21/2025 AT 02:00 PM IS CANCELLED.
  5. P1 KENNETH KELBER'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE MARGIE T KARL 0075952. ^F^ MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE 06/01/2025 - UNKNOWN
  6. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 05/21/2025 AT 02:00 PM. THIS MATTER IS SET FOR AN IN PERSON CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL ARE TO REPORT TO THE 6TH FLOOR OF COURTHOUSE SQUARE, 310 WEST. LAKESIDE AVENUE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44113. ANY PARTY APPEARING SOLELY THROUGH COUNSEL MUST HAVE A CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE WITH SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY AVAILABLE BY PHONE IF NEEDED. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS PLAINTIFF HAS NOT COMPLIED WITH LOCAL RULE 24.0(A) IN THAT THEY HAVE NOT FILED A PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO FILE A PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT ON OR BEFORE MAY 19, 2025. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER AND/OR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL RULES. THE MAGISTRATE WILL SET A CASE MANAGMENT CONFERENCE BY SEPERATE ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56285654 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/08/2025 BRICKMAN/MARI/M PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  9. SUMS COMPLAINT(56285654) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MARI M BRICKMAN 3795 HIGHLAND ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44111
  10. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  11. WRIT FEE
  12. MAGISTRATE BRIAN S GOZELANCZYK ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  13. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. JUDGE KELLY ANN GALLAGHER ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  15. LEGAL RESEARCH
  16. LEGAL NEWS
  17. LEGAL AID
  18. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  19. COMPUTER FEE
  20. CLERK'S FEE
  21. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID MARGIE T KARL

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more