Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-05
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 20 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Key Bank Na
Defendant Marie Hrisko
Photo of Hon. MAUREEN CLANCY

Judge

Hon. MAUREEN CLANCY

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56936520) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MARIE HRISKO 1428 E. 52ND STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44103
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56936519) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DENISE M LESKOVEC [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56936518) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DENISE M LESKOVEC [email protected]
  5. CASE CALLED FOR DEFAULT HEARING ON 05/08/2025. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL; DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 04/212025, IS GRANTED. THE COURT FINDS THAT PROPER SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND THAT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED UNDER CIV.R. 12. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 55, DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE RENDERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANT IN THE PRINCIPAL SUM OF $16,389.61, PLUS ACCRUED INTEREST OF $856.52 THROUGH 12/31/2024, PLUS LATE FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $120.00, PLUS COSTS OF THIS ACTION. OSJ. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. NOTICE FILED BY P1 KEY BANK NA ATTORNEY DENISE M LESKOVEC 0077440 NOTICE OF FILING FOR DEFAULT HEARING
  7. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  8. THE DOCKET REFLECTS THAT DEFENDANT WAS SERVED VIA CERTIFIED MAIL ON 03/10/2025. DEFENDANT WAS REQUIRED TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 04/07/2025. AS OF 04/11/2025, NO ANSWER OR OTHER RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED. CASE IS HEREBY SET FOR DEFAULT HEARING. PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION FOR DEFAULT WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THIS ORDER. ANY MOTIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OR CONTINUANCES MUST BE MADE IN WRITING AND FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS. ORAL MOTIONS FOR CONTINUANCES WILL NOT BE ENTERTAINED. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 05/08/2025 AT 9:00 A.M. PARTIES AND COUNSEL ARE TO WAIT IN THE 20TH FLOOR LOBBY FOR THIS CASE TO BE CALLED. PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY MUST FILE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS PRIOR TO THE HEARING: 1. THE CONTRACT(S), ASSIGNMENT(S), OR WRITTEN INSTRUMENT(S) UPON WHICH PLAINTIFF SEEKS JUDGMENT; 2. JUDGMENT ENTRY REFLECTING PRINCIPAL DUE WITHOUT REGARD TO ACCRUED INTEREST; 3. AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY AVERRING COMPLIANCE WITH ALL SERVICE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES AND RULES; AND 4. AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF OR PLAINTIFF'S REPRESENTATIVE PROVING DAMAGES. 5. PLAINTIFF IS REQUIRED TO NOTIFY IN WRITING ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE HEARING DATE. PROOF OF TIMELY MAILING OF SUCH NOTICE MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE DEFAULT HEARING. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT OR PROOF OF CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE ATTEMPTS, AVAILABLE FROM THE USPS WEBSITE, IS ALSO REQUIRED. 6. EVIDENCE OF MILITARY SERVICE STATUS OF DEFENDANT PURSUANT TO THE SERVICEMEMBERS' CIVIL RELIEF ACT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 41(B)(1). DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 05/08/2025 AT 09:00 AM. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56292117 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/10/2025 HRISKO/MARIE/ PROCESSED BY COC 03/19/2025.
  10. SUMS COMPLAINT(56292117) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MARIE HRISKO 1428 E. 52ND STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44103
  11. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  12. WRIT FEE
  13. JUDGE MAUREEN CLANCY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  14. LEGAL RESEARCH
  15. LEGAL NEWS
  16. LEGAL AID
  17. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  18. COMPUTER FEE
  19. CLERK'S FEE
  20. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DENISE M LESKOVEC

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more