Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-27
Status INACTIVE
Type Tort Miscellaneous
Docket 31 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Frank Miller|Robin Miller
Defendant Christa Swoope
Photo of Hon. Cassandra Collier Williams

Judge

Hon. Cassandra Collier Williams

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59123978) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: PATRICK M ROCHE [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59123977) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SCOTT A RUMIZEN [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59123976) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SCOTT A RUMIZEN [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59123975) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL A SALTZER [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59123974) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL A SALTZER [email protected]
  7. THE COURT ACKNOWLEDGES THE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL, FILED 12/30/2025. THEREFORE, THIS CASE IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE WITH COSTS TO DEFENDANT. THE COURT RETAINS JURISDICTION TO ENFORCEMENT THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN PARTIES. SO ORDERED. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. STIPULATION FILED BY D1 CHRISTA SWOOPE ATTORNEY PATRICK M ROCHE 0071359 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
  9. NOTICE FILED BY PLAINTIFF(S) FRANK MILLER(P1) and ROBIN MILLER(P2) ATTORNEY MICHAEL A SALTZER 0040284 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF IDENTIFYING EXPERT AND PRODUCTION OF EXPERT WITNESS REPORTS
  10. CMC BY PHONE HELD ON 04/24/2025. ALL PARTIES APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL AND AGREED TO THE FOLLOWING CASE SCHEDULE: THE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF IS 08/22/2025. ON 08/22/2025, THIS CASE IS TO BE REFERRED TO THE ADR DEPARTMENT FOR MEDIATION AND THEN ARBITRATION IF MEDIATION IS UNSUCCESSFUL. THIS CASE IS TO BE MEDIATED WITHIN 75 DAYS OF REFERRAL. PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 09/20/2025. RESPONSIVE EXPERT REPORT DUE 10/20/2025 . FAILURE TO APPEAR AT ANY COURT SCHEDULED EVENT IN THE FUTURE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT RENDERED AGAINST DEFENDANT. SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. STIPULATION FILED BY PLAINTIFF(S) FRANK MILLER(P1) and ROBIN MILLER(P2) ATTORNEY MICHAEL A SALTZER 0040284 STIPULATION
  12. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY PLAINTIFF(S) FRANK MILLER(P1) and ROBIN MILLER(P2) ATTORNEY MICHAEL A SALTZER 0040284 REPORT OF PARTIES' PLANNING CONFERENCE UNDER OHIO CIV. RULE 26(F)
  13. CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 55960957 ADDRESSED TO CHRISTA SWOOPE(D1) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  14. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY PLAINTIFF(S) FRANK MILLER(P1) and ROBIN MILLER(P2) ATTORNEY MICHAEL A SALTZER 0040284 PLAINTIFFS' CIVIL RULE 26(B)(3) INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  15. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR ROCHE/PATRICK/M 03/03/2025 17:02:03
  16. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR RUMIZEN/SCOTT/A 03/03/2025 17:02:03
  17. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR SALTZER/MICHAEL/A 03/03/2025 17:02:03
  18. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/24/2025 AT 09:00 AM. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 978-990-5000 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 701774# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR FOR THIS CMC WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. ANY ATTORNEY OR UNREPRESENTED PARTY WHO IS NOT AVAILABLE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED HIS/HER PARTICIPATION AND TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE CASE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. PRIOR TO THE CMC, PARTIES MUST EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 26(B)(3) AND DRAFT A PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 26(F). COUNSEL SHALL FILE WITH THE COURT THE PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN AND NOTICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE CMC. IF THE PARTIES ARE UNABLE TO CONFER, PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE EVIDENCE WITH THE COURT OF EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT ANY COURT SCHEDULED EVENT IN THE FUTURE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT RENDERED AGAINST DEFENDANT. SO ORDERED.
  19. ANSWER FILED BY D1 CHRISTA SWOOPE ATTORNEY PATRICK M ROCHE 0071359 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
  20. SUMS COMPLAINT(55960957) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CHRISTA SWOOPE 3693 BURBRIDGE ROAD CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH 44121
  21. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. WRIT FEE
  23. JUDGE STEVEN E GALL ASSIGNED (RANDOM); RE-FILED CASE, REASSIGNED TO ORIGINAL JUDGE, JUDGE CASSANDRA COLLIER-WILLIAMS
  24. JUDGE STEVEN E GALL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  25. LEGAL RESEARCH
  26. LEGAL NEWS
  27. LEGAL AID
  28. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  29. COMPUTER FEE
  30. CLERK'S FEE
  31. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID MICHAEL A SALTZER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more