Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Litchfield County

Court

Litchfield County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-03
Type P 10 Property Partition
Docket 61 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Christine Weydig
Defendant 68 Gunn Hill Road Llc|Irene Weydig Konopka Aka Irene Weydig|William Weydig Aka William Weydig Jr.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. LIST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a)
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. AMENDED COMPLAINT Amended Complaint As of Right
  6. REQUEST TO REVISE AMENDED COMPLAINT
  7. MOTION FOR ORDER Motion for Determination that Property is Heirs' Property RESULT: Granted 11/13/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  8. ORDER RESULT: Off 6/30/2025 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  9. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/13/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  10. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD re: Respond to REQ to REV Entry No. 102.00
  11. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/30/2025 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  12. OBJECTION TO MOTION re: Motion for Order - Determination of Heirs Property Entry No. 103.00
  13. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/30/2025 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  14. MOTION FOR ORDER
  15. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/30/2025 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  16. COUNTERCLAIM
  17. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/26/2025 HON ALEXANDRA DIPENTIMA
  18. LIS PENDENS with marshal's return of service
  19. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE re: August 4 status conference and motion hearing - joint motion RESULT: Granted 7/22/2025 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  20. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/22/2025 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  21. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) re: Motion for Continuance #110
  22. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD to Respond to Defendant's Counterclaim (Entry No. 107.00) RESULT: Granted 9/3/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  23. ORDER RESULT: Granted 9/3/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  24. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 Defendants' Discovery Requests dated 06-10-2025 RESULT: Granted 9/3/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  25. ORDER RESULT: Granted 9/3/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  26. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD to Respond to Defendant's Counterclaim (Entry No. 107.00) RESULT: Granted 10/6/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  27. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/6/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  28. ORDER RESULT: Order 8/26/2025 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  29. WITHDRAWAL OF CERTAIN COUNTS OF THE COMPLAINT Partial Withdrawal - First Count (Partition per CGS Sec. 52-500)
  30. ORDER RESULT: Order 9/18/2025 HON ALEXANDRA DIPENTIMA
  31. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 Defendants' Discovery Requests RESULT: Granted 10/6/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  32. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/6/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  33. REVISED COMPLAINT per Entry Nos. 102.00 & 117.00
  34. MEMORANDUM Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief re: Heirs' Property per Entry No. 117.00
  35. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION Supplemental brief regarding motion for determination that property is heirs' property
  36. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  37. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/21/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  38. MOTION FOR NONSUIT FOR FAILURE TO PLEAD Motion for Order of Nonsuit or to Compel Compliance with Request to Revise RESULT: Denied 1/6/2026 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  39. ORDER RESULT: Denied 1/6/2026 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  40. MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE - PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD - 13-6/13-9) or Order of Nonsuit
  41. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/30/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  42. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) report back re: available dates for argument on Motion #103
  43. MOTION FOR ORDER JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER RE: MOTION #124.00 RESULT: Granted 11/13/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  44. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/13/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  45. MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION-COURT ORDER re: Court Order Entry No. 103.20 RESULT: Granted 11/17/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  46. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/17/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  47. ORDER RESULT: Order 12/4/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  48. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) report back re: agreement on appraiser RESULT: Order 12/10/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  49. RECORD CORRECTION See #103.20 RESULT: Order 12/10/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK Watermark Last Updated: Multiple Field Correction - 12/11/2025
  50. ORDER RESULT: Order 12/10/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  51. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE re: Defendants First ROGS and RFP
  52. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR NONSUIT RE: Entry No, 123.00
  53. OATH OF APPRAISERS Court-Appointed/Independent Appraiser RESULT: Order 1/9/2026 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  54. ORDER RESULT: Order 1/9/2026 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  55. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE re: LLC Counterclaim Entry No. 107/00
  56. REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE Reply in Avoidance of Pltf. Special Defenses to Counterclaim
  57. OBJECTION Objection to Appraisal per CGS Sec. 52-503k(e)(3) RESULT: Order 3/3/2026 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  58. ORDER RESULT: Order 3/3/2026 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  59. REPLY to Objection to Appraisal
  60. REQUEST TO REVISE re: Reply to Special Defenses - Entry No. 135.00
  61. OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more