Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-19
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 70 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Pennymac Loan Services Llc
Defendant Rebecca Horsman|John Doe Name Unknown Unknown Spouse If Any Of Rebecca Horsman
Photo of Hon. JOAN SYNENBERG

Judge

Hon. JOAN SYNENBERG

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT, SERVICE REQUEST, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. DEPOSIT REQUIRED FOR COSTS TO CLERK $637.02 SHERIFF
  3. TO COURT: 01/16/2026 ORDER OF SALE RETURNED ENDORSED ADVERT, & SOLD TO: TARRIFY PROPERTIES LLC ........................................................................................... FOR $94,000.00 DATE OF SALE 09/22/2025 (SEE ATTACHED IMAGE FOR DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS BY SHERIFF)
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58750755) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JOHN DOE NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN SPOUSE IF ANY OF REBECCA HORSMAN 3025 MABEL CT CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58750754) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: REBECCA HORSMAN 3025 MABEL CT CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58750753) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58750752) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER [email protected]
  8. DECREE OF CONFIRMATION (Parcel(s) #02204070) THE SHERIFF HAVING SOLD THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER OF SALE ISSUED TO HIM, THE COURT BEING SATISFIED OF THE LEGALITY OF THE SALE AND THAT THE NOTICE OF THE SALE WAS IN ALL RESPECTS IN CONFORMITY TO LAW, APPROVES AND CONFIRMS THE SAME AND DIRECTS THE SHERIFF TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER TO TARRIFY PROPERTIES LLC A GOOD AND SUFFICIENT DEED THEREOF. UPON FULL PAYMENT OF THE PURCHASE PRICE, THE PURCHASER WILL BE ENTITLED TO A WRIT OF POSSESSION AGAINST ALL PARTY DEFENDANTS. ALL UNDISPUTED STATE LIENS ARE PROTECTED AS PROVIDED IN R.C. SEC. 2329.192. THE CLERK OF COURTS MUST SERVE, IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B), ALL PARTIES NOT IN DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR NOTICE OF THIS JUDGMENT AND ITS DATE OF ENTRY UPON THE JOURNAL AND MUST NOTE THE SERVICE ON THE APPEARANCE DOCKET. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B). NOTICE ISSUED
  9. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ADVANCES, FILED ON 10/14/25, REQUESTING DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS FROM THE PROCEEDS OF THE FORECLOSURE SALE. THE MOTION IS SUPPORTED BY AN AFFIDAVIT FROM A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE LENDING INSTITUTION PURPORTING TO IDENTIFY CERTAIN POST-JUDGMENT ADVANCES. OHIO REVISED CODE SECTION 5301.233 PROVIDES A STATUTORY FRAMEWORK FOR THE EXPENSES THAT A MORTGAGE MAY SECURE, AND IT EXPLICITLY INCLUDES TAXES, ASSESSMENTS, HAZARD INSURANCE PREMIUMS, AND COSTS INCURRED FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE MORTGAGED PREMISES. UPON REVIEW, THE COURT FINDS THE MOTION TO BE OVERBROAD AND INSUFFICIENTLY PARTICULARIZED. THE AFFIDAVIT AND SUPPORTING MATERIALS INCLUDE VARIOUS CHARGES, SOME OF WHICH MAY ARGUABLY FALL WITHIN ALLOWABLE CATEGORIES (SUCH AS TAXES, HAZARD INSURANCE, OR PROPERTY PROTECTION), BUT MANY OF WHICH DO NOT. PLAINTIFF ATTACHES AN EXHIBIT THAT IS NOT LEGIBLE. THE COURT NOTES THE INCLUSION OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: - INTEREST ALREADY ADDRESSED AND AWARDED IN THE FORECLOSURE DECREE; - PRINCIPAL BALANCE ALREADY ADDRESSED AND AWARDED IN THE FORECLOSURE DECREE; - "ESCROW BAL/ADVANCE" (UNDEFINED AND UNEXPLAINED); - "FORECLOSURE COSTS" (UNDEFINED AND UNEXPLAINED); - "VALUATIONS" (UNDEFINED AND UNEXPLAINED); - AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS COSTS. THE COURT REITERATES THAT POST-SALE REIMBURSEMENT IS LIMITED TO ADVANCES MADE FOR: (1) TAXES (2) HAZARD INSURANCE (3) PROPERTY PROTECTION THE COURT WILL NOT UNDERTAKE THE TASK OF SORTING, CLASSIFYING, OR EXCLUDING IMPERMISSIBLE CHARGES ON THE PLAINTIFF'S BEHALF. THAT BURDEN RESTS SQUARELY WITH THE PLAINTIFF AND ITS COUNSEL. ACCORDINGLY, THE MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT IS HEREBY DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF IS HEREBY GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE A REVISED MOTION WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS ARE MET: 9. PROPER CATEGORIZATION: EACH REQUESTED ADVANCE MUST BE ASSIGNED SOLELY TO ONE OF THE THREE PERMISSIBLE CATEGORIES: A. TAXES B. HAZARD INSURANCE C. PROPERTY PROTECTION 10. DETAILED ITEMIZATION: EACH CATEGORY MUST INCLUDE A CLEARLY ITEMIZED LIST, IDENTIFYING THE DATE, AMOUNT, PAYEE, AND A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EACH CHARGE. 11. SUBTOTAL AND TOTAL: THE MOTION MUST INCLUDE A SUBTOTAL FOR EACH CATEGORY AND A FINAL TOTAL OF ALL CLAIMED ADVANCES. 12. SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT: A REVISED SWORN AFFIDAVIT MUST ACCOMPANY THE MOTION, ATTESTING TO THE ACCURACY OF THE CATEGORIZATION. IF PLAINTIFF SEEKS REIMBURSEMENT FOR ANY CHARGE NOT FALLING WITHIN THE THREE ENUMERATED CATEGORIES, IT MUST SIMULTANEOUSLY FILE A SEPARATE LEGAL MEMORANDUM IDENTIFYING EACH SUCH ITEM AND SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC LEGAL AUTHORITY AND ARGUMENT SUPPORTING THE CLAIM FOR REIMBURSEMENT. BLANKET ASSERTIONS OR UNSUPPORTED REQUESTS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF FILED A MOTION FOR ADVANCES ON 10/14/25. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. MOTION FILED FOR P1 PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES LLC SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER 0086422 MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF ADVANCES
  12. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE CONFIRMATION ENTRY
  13. OOS ORDER OF SALE RETURNED 9/24/2025, SOLD DATE 9/22/2025 SOLD TO: TARRIFY PROPERTIES LLC FOR $94,000.00
  14. PROOF OF PUBLICATION FILED. PUBLICATION COST OF $653.85 PREPAID TO LEGAL NEWS.
  15. RECORDER'S FEE $1.00
  16. NOTICE FILED BY P1 PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES LLC ATTORNEY SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER 0086422 NOTICE OF SHERIFFS SALE
  17. NOTICE OF SALE AND APPROVAL OF APPRAISERS' FEES. THE SALE IS SCHEDULED FOR 09/22/2025 AT 9:00 A.M. AT CUYAHOGA.SHERIFFSALEAUCTION.OHIO.GOV. IF NOT SOLD ON 09/22/2025 IT WILL BE RE-OFFERED ON 10/06/2025 PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT EACH APPRAISER NAMED BE COMPENSATED BY THE CLERK OF COURTS, FROM THE FUNDS ON DEPOSIT AS FOLLOWS: JOHN KOZ, APPRAISAL COST: $53.18 REGULAR FEE AND MILEAGE. THOMAS P HOGAN, APPRAISAL COST: $50 REGULAR FEE. DANIEL J ROCCO, APPRAISAL COST: $50 REGULAR FEE. FEES TO BE TAXED AS COSTS IN CASE NO. CV-25-112370 DATED THIS 19th DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 NOTICE ISSUED NOTICE ISSUED
  18. OOS LAND APPRAISAL FILED
  19. ORDER OF SALE ISSUED TO TO SHERIFF WITH APPRAISAL Parcel#(s) 022-04-070
  20. REAL AUCTION
  21. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER
  22. PRAECIPE FOR ORDER OF SALE $820 ORDER OF SALE
  23. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57668334) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JOHN DOE NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN SPOUSE IF ANY OF REBECCA HORSMAN 3025 MABEL CT CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  24. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57668333) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: REBECCA HORSMAN 3025 MABEL CT CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  25. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57668332) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER [email protected]
  26. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57668331) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER [email protected]
  27. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S DECISION. ORDER SEE JOURNAL NOTICE ISSUED
  28. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(57443512) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JOHN DOE NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN SPOUSE IF ANY OF REBECCA HORSMAN 3025 MABEL CT CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  29. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(57443511) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: REBECCA HORSMAN 3025 MABEL CT CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  30. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(57443510) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER [email protected]
  31. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(57443509) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER [email protected]
  32. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION WITH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FILED AND SENT TO ALL PARTIES ON SERVICE PAGE.
  33. DEFAULT HEARING HELD BY MAGISTRATE. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL APPEARED. DEFENDANT(S) DID NOT APPEAR. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. THE MAGISTRATE WILL ISSUE A MAGISTRATE'S DECISION MAKING SPECIFIC FINDINGS AS TO THE RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES OF THE PARTIES. NOTICE ISSUED
  34. NOTICE FILED BY P1 PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES LLC ATTORNEY SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER 0086422 NOTICE OF TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING
  35. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 06/24/2025 AT 01:15 PM. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THE PARTY MOVING FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT DEFAULT HEARING MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  36. NOTICE FILED BY P1 PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES LLC ATTORNEY SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER 0086422 NOTICE OF FILING FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT
  37. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES LLC ATTORNEY SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER 0086422 AFFIDAVIT THAT DEFENDANT REBECCA HORSMAN IS NOT IN THE MILITARY SERVICE
  38. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES LLC ATTORNEY SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER 0086422 ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT
  39. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  40. IT APPEARS SERVICE HAS BEEN PERFECTED ON ALL PARTIES. ANY PARTY SEEKING TO PROSECUTE THIS CASE MUST FILE APPROPRIATE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS ON OR BEFORE 5/27/25. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  41. 56298414 ON 03/24/2025 THE WITHIN NAMED JOHN DOE NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN SPOUSE IF ANY OF REBECCA HORSMAN WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  42. 56298413 ON 03/24/2025 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED HORSMAN/REBECCA/ BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  43. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  44. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  45. SUMS COMPLAINT(56298414) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JOHN DOE NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN SPOUSE IF ANY OF REBECCA HORSMAN 3025 MABEL CT CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  46. SUMS COMPLAINT(56298413) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: REBECCA HORSMAN 3025 MABEL CT CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  47. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  48. WRIT FEE
  49. WRIT FEE
  50. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  51. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56204764 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/01/2025 JOHN DOE NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN SPOUSE IF ANY OF REBECCA HORSMAN PROCESSED BY COC 03/05/2025.
  52. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56204763 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/01/2025 HORSMAN/REBECCA/ PROCESSED BY COC 03/05/2025.
  53. SUMS COMPLAINT(56204764) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN DOE NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN SPOUSE IF ANY OF REBECCA HORSMAN 3025 MABEL CT CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  54. SUMS COMPLAINT(56204763) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: REBECCA HORSMAN 3025 MABEL CT CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  55. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  56. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  57. WRIT FEE
  58. WRIT FEE
  59. MAGISTRATE GINA LUNSFORD ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  60. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  61. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  62. JUDGE JOAN SYNENBERG ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  63. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  64. LEGAL RESEARCH
  65. LEGAL NEWS
  66. LEGAL AID
  67. COMPUTER FEE
  68. CLERK'S FEE
  69. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER
  70. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID SUZANNE M. GODENSWAGER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase