Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-22
Status INACTIVE
Type Tort M.v. Accident
Docket 18 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Cincinnati Insurance Company As Subrogee And Successor In Interest David & Deborah Evans
Defendant Yao Koffi
Photo of Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Judge

Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56458903) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: YAO KOFFI 862 WELLMON STREET BEDFORD, OH 44146
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56458902) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DENNIS G. REHOR [email protected]
  4. THIS CASE WAS CALLED FOR A DEFAULT HEARING ON MARCH 24, 2025, AS SCHEDULED. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL AND THERE WAS NO APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT. THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED FEBRUARY 27, 2025, IS GRANTED, AND JUDGMENT ON THE COMPLAINT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY AND AGAINST DEFENDANT YAO KOFFI IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $4,033.07, WITH INTEREST AT THE STATUTORY RATE BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF JUDGMENT, PLUS COURT COSTS. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  5. THE DEFENDANT IS IN DEFAULT OF AN ANSWER AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 2025, AND THE PLAINTIFF FILED A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ACCORDINGLY, A HEARING ON THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SET AS FOLLOWS: DEFAULT HEARING IS SET FOR 03/24/2025 AT 10:00 AM IN COURTROOM 18-D. PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY SHALL BRING JUDGMENT ENTRY; AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT ACCORDING TO STATUTE AND RULES, SERVICE REQUIREMENTS WERE COMPLIED WITH; AND AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF, OR PLAINTIFF'S REPRESENTATIVE, PROVING DAMAGES. PLAINTIFF TO NOTIFY ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL. SAID LETTER ALSO SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE: "JUDGMENT MAY BE RENDERED AGAINST YOU." NOTICE ISSUED
  6. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  7. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55922271 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/29/2025 KOFFI/YAO/ PROCESSED BY COC 02/05/2025.
  8. SUMS COMPLAINT(55922271) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: YAO KOFFI 862 WELLMON STREET BEDFORD, OH 44146
  9. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  10. WRIT FEE
  11. JUDGE JOHN P O'DONNELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  12. LEGAL RESEARCH
  13. LEGAL NEWS
  14. LEGAL AID
  15. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  16. COMPUTER FEE
  17. CLERK'S FEE
  18. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DENNIS G. REHOR

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more