Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oakland Co

Court

Oakland Co

Michigan

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-17
Type Ni
Docket 67 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Tanner Connie|Pratt Connie
Defendant None|None|None|Citizens United Reciprocal Exc|Pv Holding Corp|Tanner Rena Nicole|Rugenstein Dennis Alan
Photo of Hon. Jeffery S Matis

Judge

Hon. Jeffery S Matis

Oakland County (MI)

Michigan

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  2. RESPONSE FILED TO MTN SUM DISP/POS/DFT
  3. WITNESS LIST FILED /POS/DFT
  4. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  5. EXHIBIT LIST FILED /POS/DFT
  6. DISCLOSURE FILED /POS/DFT
  7. STIP/ORD FILED SUB OF ATTYS
  8. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  9. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 03192025 JUDGE 04
  10. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  11. NOTICE OF HEARING FILED RE/POS
  12. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  13. NOTICE FILED TAKING DEP/POS
  14. ORDER FILED RE MTN SUM DISP
  15. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  16. MOTION FILED FOR SUM DISP/NOH/BRF/POS/DFT
  17. NOTICE FILED REMOTE PARTICIPATION
  18. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  19. STIP/ORD FILED SUB ATTY
  20. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 01292025 JUDGE 04
  21. MOTION FILED COMPEL OVERDUE DSCVRY RESP/BRF/POS/TANNER
  22. NOTICE OF HEARING FILED /POS
  23. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  24. ORDER FILED PRETRIAL
  25. SCHEDULING ORDER FILED
  26. SCHEDULING ORDER WRITTEN
  27. 04/04/2025 EXPERT DATE.
  28. 06/05/2025 CASE EVALUATION DATE.
  29. 04/08/2025 WITNESS DATE.
  30. 06/06/2025 MOTION DATE.
  31. 05/08/2025 DISCOVERY DATE.
  32. 09/15/2025 TRIAL DATE.
  33. DATE SET FOR TRIAL ON 09152025 08 30 AM
  34. NOTICE FILED INTENT REQ FAULT NON PTY/POS
  35. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  36. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  37. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  38. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  39. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FILED /POS/DFT
  40. JURY DEMAND FILED RELIANCE/POS/DFT
  41. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES FILED /POS/DFT
  42. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  43. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  44. RESPONSE FILED TO REQ FOR ADMISSIONS/POS/PLF
  45. APPEARANCE FILED /POS/DFT
  46. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  47. DISCLOSURE FILED /INITIAL/DFT
  48. AFFIDAVIT/PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  49. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  50. REQUEST FILED ADMISS TO PLF/DFT
  51. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  52. AFFIDAVIT/PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  53. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  54. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  55. P/S ON SUMMONS FILED 10/19/24
  56. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  57. P/S ON SUMMONS FILED 10/11/24
  58. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FILED /AFM/JD/POS/PV HOLDING
  59. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  60. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  61. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FILED /APP/AFM/JD/POS/CITIZENS
  62. NOTICE FILED TAKING DEP/POS
  63. SUMMONS ISSUED
  64. SUMMONS ISSUED
  65. SUMMONS ISSUED
  66. JURY DEMAND FILED
  67. COMPLAINT FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more