Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Case Information
Filed
2025-02-05
Status
INACTIVE
Type
Tort Miscellaneous
Docket
44 entries
Parties
Plaintiff
Wilfred Anderson
Defendant
Jack Cleveland Casino Llc #1982656
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- CASE FILED: PERSONAL IDENTIFIER FORM, POVERTY AFFIDAVIT, COMPLAINT
- THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, FILED 08/02/2025. DEFENDANT FILED A BRIEF IN OPPOSITION ON 08/13/2025. NO REPLY WAS FILED. BECAUSE THE COURT ISSUED A FINAL JUDGMENT ON 07/30/2025 TO THE EXTENT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION THAT MOTION IS A NULLITY. SEE PINE V. HADDOX INSTALLATION SERVS., LLC, 2005-OHIO-3635, P9 ("A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF A FINAL JUDGMENT IS A NULLITY."). HOWEVER, DESPITE THE MOTION'S TITLE, THE COURT FINDS THAT THE MOTION IS ARGUABLY, SUBSTANTIVELY A MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 60(B). "ONCE A CASE HAS BEEN APPEALED, THE TRIAL COURT IS DIVESTED OF JURISDICTION EXCEPT 'OVER ISSUES NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THAT OF THE APPELLATE COURT TO REVIEW, AFFIRM, MODIFY OR REVERSE THE APPEALED JUDGMENT, SUCH AS THE COLLATERAL ISSUES LIKE CONTEMPT' ***' THE SUPREME COURT HAS FURTHER EXPRESSLY HELD THAT 'AN APPEAL DIVESTS TRIAL COURTS OF JURISDICTION TO CONSIDER CIV.R. 60(B) MOTIONS FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT'." PINE V. HADDOX INSTALLATION SERVS., LLC, 2005-OHIO-3635, P10 (INTERNAL CITATIONS OMITTED). BECAUSE PLAINTIFF FILED AN APPEAL ON 08/02/2025, THE COURT IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO RULE ON THE MOTION WHILE THE APPEAL IS PENDING. ACCORDINGLY, THE MOTION IS HELD IN ABEYANCE PENDING APPEAL. NOTICE ISSUED
- BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY D1 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 KATHLEEN MEREDITH KENNEDY 0103119 DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
- JUDGMENT ENTRY(57690498) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: WILFRED ANDERSON 7230 KINSMAN ROAD STE 213 CLEVELAND, OH 44104
- -------------------- NOTICE OF APPEAL -------------------- CA NO. 115393 NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PLTF. APPELLANT W/A 9A PRAECIPE AND DOCKETING STATEMENT ON THE REGULAR CALENDAR.
- MOTION FILED FOR P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
- NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED NOTICE OF APPEAL
- NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED NOTICE OF APPEAL
- JUDGMENT ENTRY(57690497) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KATHLEEN MEREDITH KENNEDY [email protected]
- JUDGMENT ENTRY(57690496) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JOSEPH MONROE [email protected]
- THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT ON DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S ("DEFENDANT") MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED BY VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR WILFRED ANDERSON, MD, FILED 04/03/2025. PLAINTIFF, WILFRED ANDERSON ("PLAINTIFF") FILED A MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS ON 04/14/2025 AND DEFENDANT FILED A REPLY ON 04/21/2025. PLAINTIFF FILED A MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS ON 04/22/2025, WHICH WAS GRANTED OVER DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION. ACCORDINGLY, PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM, FILED 04/22/2025, IS ALSO BEFORE THE COURT FOR CONSIDERATION. ON 05/30/2025 THE COURT GAVE NOTICE OF ITS INTENT TO CONVERT THE MOTION TO DISMISS TO A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTED DEFENDANT 14 DAYS LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS MOTION, AND ALLOWED RESPONSES PURSUANT TO THE TIME LIMITS SET FORTH IN CIV.R. 6(C)(2). DEFENDANT FILED A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON 06/13/2025 ALONG WITH THE AFFIDAVIT OF JOSEPH MONROE II AND SEVERAL EXHIBITS. PLAINTIFF FILED A SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION BRIEF ON 07/11/2025, CONSISTING OF THREE SEPARATELY FILED DOCUMENTS, AND DEFENDANT FILED A REPLY ON 07/16/2025. PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 56, SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS APPROPRIATE WHEN (1) THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT, (2) THE MOVING PARTY IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, AND (3) REASONABLE MINDS CAN COME TO BUT ONE CONCLUSION, AND THAT CONCLUSION IS ADVERSE TO THE NONMOVING PARTY, THAT PARTY BEING ENTITLED TO HAVE THE EVIDENCE CONSTRUED MOST STRONGLY IN HIS FAVOR. HORTON V. HARWICK CHEM. CORP, 73 OHIO ST.3D 679, 1995-OHIO-286, 653 N.E.2D 1196, PARAGRAPH THREE OF THE SYLLABUS (OHIO 1995). THE PARTY MOVING FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BEARS THE BURDEN OF SHOWING THAT THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT AND THAT HE IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW. DRESHER V. BURT, 75 OHIO ST.3D 280, 292-293, 1996-OHIO-107, 662 N.E.2D 264, 273-274 (OHIO 1996). "ONCE THE MOVING PARTY SATISFIES ITS BURDEN, THE NONMOVING PARTY 'MAY NOT REST UPON THE MERE ALLEGATIONS OR DENIALS OF THE PARTY'S PLEADINGS, BUT THE PARTY'S RESPONSE, BY AFFIDAVIT OR AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS RULE, MUST SET FORTH SPECIFIC FACTS SHOWING THAT THERE IS A GENUINE ISSUE FOR TRIAL.' CIV. R. 56(E); MOOTISPAW V. ECKSTEIN, 76 OHIO ST.3D 383, 385, 667 N.E.2D 1197 (1996). DOUBTS MUST BE RESOLVED IN FAVOR OF THE NON-MOVING PARTY. MURPHY V. REYNOLDSBURG, 65 OHIO ST.3D 356, 358-359, 604 N.E.2D 138 (1992).'" COLLIER V. LIBATIONS LOUNGE, LLC., 8TH DIST. CUYAHOGA NO. 97504, 2012-OHIO-2390, 7. ON 03/06/2015, JUDGE PETER CORRIGAN ENTERED AN ORDER IN CASE NO. CV-14-820828 DECLARING PLAINTIFF TO BE A VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR AND PROHIBITING PLAINTIFF FROM INSTITUTING ANY LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING LEAVE TO PROCEED, PURSUANT TO R.C. 2323.52. SEE EX. A-1 TO MONROE AFF. ON 06/26/2024, PLAINTIFF FILED A COMPLAINT IN CASE NO. CV-24-999576 ALLEGING THAT HE WAS A PATRON AT JACK CASINO ON 12/07/2022 WHEN HE WAS FORCIBLY GRABBED AND ASSAULTED ("THE INCIDENT"). HOWEVER, ON 07/10/2024 THIS COURT DISMISSED THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE BECAUSE PLAINTIFF HAD NOT OBTAINED LEAVE TO PROCEED FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE BEFORE INSTITUTING THE PROCEEDINGS, AS REQUIRED BY JUDGE CORRIGAN'S ORDER. ON 12/04/2024, PLAINTIFF PROPERLY FILED A REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE, IN CASE NO. SD-24-078521, AND ON 12/06/2024 THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE GRANTED PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS. SEE EX. A-1 TO MONROE AFF. ON 12/19/2024, PLAINTIFF FILED A MOTION IN CASE NO. CV-24-999576 TO REOPEN THE CASE SINCE PLAINTIFF HAD OBTAINED LEAVE FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE. THE MOTION WAS DENIED ON 01/07/2025. PLAINTIFF THEN INITIATED THIS ACTION, WHICH WAS GIVEN CASE NO. CV-25-111496, ON 02/05/2025, CLAIMING HE WAS ASSAULTED DURING THE INCIDENT. COMPLAINT AT 3-4, 7. DEFENDANT MOVES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE GROUNDS THAT PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM IS BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. THE PARTIES AGREE THAT THE RELEVANT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IS TWO YEARS, AS SET FORTH IN R.C. 2305.10. SEE MOTION TO DISMISS AT P3; BRIEF IN OPPOSITION AT P2. THE RELEVANT FACTS IN THIS CASE ARE UNDISPUTED. THE INCIDENT OCCURRED ON 12/07/2022. THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS WOULD ORDINARILY HAVE RUN ON 12/07/2024. HOWEVER, R.C. 2323.52(F)(1) PROVIDES FOR TOLLING OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS WHEN AN APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IS FILED. THE STATUTE PROVIDES, IN RELEVANT PART: "IF A PERSON WHO HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE A VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR UNDER THIS SECTION REQUESTS THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS THAT ENTERED AN ORDER UNDER DIVISION (D)(1) OF THIS SECTION TO GRANT THE PERSON LEAVE TO PROCEED AS DESCRIBED IN DIVISION (F)(1) OF THIS SECTION, THE PERIOD OF TIME COMMENCING WITH THE FILING WITH THAT COURT OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED AND ENDING WITH THE ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER OF THAT NATURE SHALL NOT BE COMPUTED AS A PART OF AN APPLICABLE PERIOD OF LIMITATIONS WITHIN WHICH THE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS OR APPLICATION INVOLVED GENERALLY MUST BE INSTITUTED OR MADE." IN THE CASE AT HAND, THE RECORD IS CLEAR THAT PLAINTIFF PROPERLY FILED HIS APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED ON 12/04/2024 AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE GRANTED LEAVE TO PROCEED ON 12/06/2024. THEREFORE, THE THREE DAYS IN WHICH HIS REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WAS PENDING DO NOT COUNT TOWARDS THE LIMITATIONS PERIOD, AND PLAINTIFF WAS REQUIRED TO FILE HIS COMPLAINT BY 12/10/2024, WELL BEFORE THE INSTANT ACTION WAS INITIATED, AND EVEN PRIOR TO PLAINTIFF FILING HIS MOTION TO REOPEN CASE NO. CV-24-999576. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS CLEAR AS A MATTER OF LAW THAT THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS HAD RUN BEFORE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, IN THIS CASE, WAS FILED. BASED UPON THE FORGOING, THE COURT HEREBY GRANTS DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. THE COURT, HAVING CONSIDERED ALL OF THE EVIDENCE AND HAVING CONSTRUED THE EVIDENCE IN A LIGHT MOST FAVORABLE TO THE NONMOVING PARTY, DETERMINES THAT REASONABLE MINDS CAN COME TO BUT ONE CONCLUSION, THAT THERE ARE NO GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT AND THAT DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
- THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, FILED 04/22/2025. DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC FILED A COMBINED MOTION TO STRIKE AND BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXCEPTION TO NEW RULE, MOTION TO DECLARE VOID PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR DETERMINATION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM, FILED 04/28/2025. PLAINTIFF FILED A MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S COMBINED MOTION TO STRIKE AND BRIEF IN OPPOSITION, FILED 04/29/2025. UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. ON 05/30/2025 THE COURT GAVE THE PARTIES NOTICE OF ITS INTENTION TO CONVERT THE MOTION TO DISMISS TO A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GAVE BOTH PARTIES AN OPPORTUNITY TO SUPPLEMENT THEIR BRIEFS. ACCORDINGLY, THE COURT FINDS THERE IS NO PREJUDICE IN ALLOWING THE PLAINTIFF TO FILE ITS SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM. THE COURT WILL CONSIDER PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN RULING ON THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. TO THE EXTENT PLAINTIFF MOVES THE COURT TO VOID THE DETERMINATION THAT PLAINTIFF IS A VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR, OR FOR ANY RELIEF OTHER THAN LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM, THAT MOTION IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE IS ALSO DENIED. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REMAINS PENDING AND WILL BE ADDRESSED BY SEPARATE ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
- REPLY BRIEF FILED BY D1 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 JOSEPH MONROE 0086540 DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONVERTED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
- BRIEF FILED BY P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 SECOND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION NOT WORD
- BRIEF FILED BY P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
- BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
- NOTICE FILED BY D1 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 ATTORNEY JOSEPH MONROE 0086540 SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED BY VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR WILFRED L. ANDERSON, MD
- THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT ON DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS, FILED 04/03/2025. PLAINTIFF FILED A COMBINED BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS AND "MOTION TO DECLARE VOID PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR DETERMINATION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO PRECLUDE ITS USE AS A DEFENSE" ("MOTION 2") ON 04/14/2025. DEFENDANT FILED A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS ON 04/21/2025. PLAINTIFF FILED A MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SURREPLY BRIEF ON 04/22/2025. DEFENDANT FILED A COMBINED MOTION TO STRIKE AND BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION 2 ON 04/28/2025. ON 04/29/2025, PLAINTIFF OPPOSED THE MOTION TO STRIKE AND FILED A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 2. WHEN A MOTION TO DISMISS PRESENTS MATTERS OUTSIDE THE PLEADINGS, THE TRIAL COURT MAY EITHER EXCLUDE THE EXTRANEOUS MATTER FROM ITS CONSIDERATION OR TREAT THE MOTION AS ONE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISPOSE OF IT PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 56. WASH. MUT. BANK V. BEATLEY, 2008-OHIO-1679, P15, 2008 OHIO APP. LEXIS 1438, *10, 2008 WL 928424. "A TRIAL COURT MAY NOT, HOWEVER, SUA SPONTE CONVERT A CIV.R. 12(B)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS INTO A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISPOSE OF IT WITHOUT GIVING NOTICE TO THE PARTIES OF ITS INTENT TO DO SO." WASH. MUT. BANK V. BEATLEY, 2008-OHIO-1679, P15, 2008 OHIO APP. LEXIS 1438, *10, 2008 WL 928424. THE COURT HEREBY GIVES NOTICE OF ITS INTENT TO CONVERT THE MOTION TO DISMISS TO A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. DEFENDANT IS GRANTED 14 DAYS LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS MOTION. RESPONSES SHALL THEN BE FILED PURSUANT TO THE TIME LIMITS SET FORTH IN CIV.R. 6(C)(2) FOR RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. NOTICE ISSUED
- BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S COMBINED MOTION TO STRIKE AND BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
- MOTION FILED FOR D1 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 KATHLEEN MEREDITH KENNEDY 0103119 DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S COMBINED MOTION TO STRIKE AND BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXCEPTION TO NEW RULE, MOTION TO DECLARE VOID PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR DETERMINATION, AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM
- MOTION FILED FOR P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM/ADDENDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
- REPLY BRIEF FILED BY D1 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 JOSEPH MONROE 0086540 DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED BY VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR WILFRED L. ANDERSON, MD
- CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD 04/17/2025. ALL PARTIES APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL AND AGREED TO THE FOLLOWING LITIGATION SCHEDULE: DISCOVERY CUT-OFF IS 07/17/2025 AFFIRMATIVE EXPERT REPORTS DUE 07/17/2025 REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORTS DUE 09/02/2025 DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS TO BE FILED BY 09/02/2025. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 6(C), AMENDED AS OF JULY 1, 2019, BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE DUE WITHIN 28 DAYS, AND REPLIES ARE DUE WITHIN 7 DAYS. A PAPER COURTESY COPY OF ALL DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, EXHIBITS, AND DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS SHALL BE HAND-DELIVERED TO THE COURT UPON FILING OF THE MOTION. BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION TO ALL NON-SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS, EXCEPT MOTIONS IN LIMINE, EXPLAINED BELOW, ARE DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS. ANY REPLIES ARE DUE WITHIN 7 DAYS. PARTIES ARE TO CONFER REGARDING NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS BEFORE FILING AND INDICATE THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT WHERE POSSIBLE. ANY MOTION FILED WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF ALL OTHER PARTIES WILL BE DENIED IF THE MOTION DOES NOT LEAVE TIME FOR THE OTHER PARTIES TO RESPOND PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 6(C). PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET AND CONFER, AND TO CONTACT THE COURT TO SCHEDULE A DISCOVERY CONFERENCE PRIOR TO FILING A MOTION TO COMPEL OR ANY OTHER DISCOVERY RELATED MOTION. PARTIES WISHING TO CONTACT THE COURT MAY ONLY DO SO BY 1) CALLING THE COURT AT 216-698-2892 WITH ALL COUNSEL/PRO SE PARTIES ON THE LINE, 2) EMAILING [email protected] WITH ALL COUNSEL/PRO SE PARTIES COPIED, OR 3) THROUGH A FILING WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS. THIS COURT SHALL NOT ENTERTAIN ANY COMMUNICATION FROM EITHER SIDE WITHOUT BOTH SIDES BEING PRESENT ON THE MEANS OF COMMUNICATION. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 12/15/2025 AT 10:30 A.M. AND WILL BE HELD IN PERSON IN COURTROOM 20(B). PARTIES SHOULD BE PREPARED TO PROCEED WITH SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS. CLIENTS WITH SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY MUST BE IN ATTENDANCE. TRIAL SET FOR 01/21/2026 AT 09:30 A.M. ALL PARTIES ARE TO SUBMIT TRIAL BRIEFS, EXHIBIT LISTS, WITNESS LISTS, STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS, VERDICT FORMS, INTERROGATORIES, OBJECTIONS TO WITNESS TESTIMONY, AND MOTIONS IN LIMINE TO THE COURT AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. JURY INSTRUCTIONS, INTERROGATORIES, AND VERDICT FORMS MUST BE FILED WITH THE CLERK AND SUBMITTED IN MICROSOFT WORD FORMAT TO [email protected]. PAPER COURTESY COPIES OF ALL DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, MOTIONS TO COMPEL OR OTHER MOTIONS OVER 10 PAGES LONG MUST BE HAND-DELIVERED TO COURTROOM 20-B OR OTHERWISE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED PROPERLY FILED. FAILURE OF ANY PARTY TO APPEAR AT ANY SCHEDULED DATE OR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ANY COURT ORDER MAY RESULT IN AN ADVERSE RESULT FOR THE NON-APPEARING/NON-COMPLYING PARTY, I.E., THE PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED AGAINST THE DEFENDANT. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 12/15/2025 AT 10:30 AM. TRIAL SET FOR 01/21/2026 AT 09:30 AM. NOTICE ISSUED
- BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
- MOTION TO DISMISS FILED DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED BY VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR WILFRED L. ANDERSON, MD
- SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR ANDERSON/WILFRED/ 03/22/2025 17:02:11
- SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR KENNEDY/KATHLEEN/MEREDITH 03/22/2025 17:02:11
- SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR MONROE/JOSEPH/ 03/22/2025 17:02:11
- CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 04/17/2025 AT 09:30 AM. THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD BY PHONE. PARTIES CAN ACCESS THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY CALLING 605-313-5952 AND ENTERING ACCESS CODE 1742872#. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 26, THE PARTIES MUST MEET AND CONFER NO LATER THAN 21 DAYS BEFORE THE CMC. THE PARTIES MUST FILE A DISCOVERY PLAN WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THEIR CONFERENCE. EACH PARTY MUST PROVIDE INITIAL DISCLOSURES TO THE OTHER PARTIES BY THE DATE OF THE CMC UNLESS THE PARTIES STIPULATE TO A LATER DATE.
- STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD FILED STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD AND JOURNAL ENTRY
- UPON THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT AND THE COURT'S REVIEW, THE COURT FINDS THAT THE APPLICANT IS AN INDIGENT LITIGANT UNDER R.C. 2323.311. IN ACCORDANCE AND FOR GOOD CAUSE, THE COURT HEREBY GRANTS A WAIVER OF PRE-PAYMENT OF COSTS OR FEES IN THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO R.C. 2323.311(B)(4), THE CLERK IS HEREBY ORDERED TO WAIVE THE ADVANCE DEPOSIT OR SECURITY. THIS RULING APPLIES ONLY TO -PREPAYMENT- OF COSTS OR FEES. PLAINTIFF MAY BE ASSESSED COSTS OR FEES AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE CASE DEPENDING ON THE CASE'S RESOLUTION. NOTICE ISSUED
- USPS RECEIPT NO. 56031733 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/08/2025 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 PROCESSED BY COC 02/12/2025.
- PURSUANT TO SUPERINTENDENCE RULE 36, THIS MATTER IS REASSIGNED TO THE DOCKET OF JUDGE MAUREEN CLANCY (358) (MANUAL). REFILE OF CASE NO. CV 24 999576. NOTICE ISSUED
- SUMS COMPLAINT(56031733) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 AGENT: CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 4400 EASTON COMMONS WAY, SUITE 125 COLUMBUS, OH 43219
- SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
- WRIT FEE
- JUDGE MICHAEL P SHAUGHNESSY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
- LEGAL RESEARCH
- LEGAL AID
- COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
- COMPUTER FEE
- CLERK'S FEE
- LEGAL NEWS
- AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY, FILED
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In
