Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-05
Status INACTIVE
Type Tort Miscellaneous
Docket 65 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Wilfred Anderson
Defendant Jack Cleveland Casino Llc #1982656|The Lee Quigley Company #673311
Photo of Hon. HOLLIE L GALLAGHER

Judge

Hon. HOLLIE L GALLAGHER

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: PERSONAL IDENTIFIER FORM, COMPLAINT, POVERTY AFFIDAVIT
  2. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 WILFRED ANDERSON ATTORNEY PRO SE 9999999 NOTICE OF APPEAL EXHIBIT A - JUDGMENT
  3. NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED
  4. NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED NOTICE OF APPEAL
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59074463) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: WILFRED ANDERSON 7230 KINSMAN ROAD 213 CLEVELAND, OH 44104
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59074462) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KATHLEEN MEREDITH KENNEDY [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59074461) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JOSEPH MONROE [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59074460) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RANDALL M TRAUB [email protected]
  9. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59074459) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RANDALL M TRAUB [email protected]
  10. THIS MATTER CAME FOR HEARING UPON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION OF THE CIVIL RULE 56 EVIDENTIARY RECORD, THE APPLICABLE LAW, AND THE PARTIES' MEMORANDA, THE COURT FINDS THERE REMAIN NO MATERIAL ISSUES OF FACT AND THAT DEFENDANTS ARE ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW. THE COURT THEREFORE GRANTS DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ENTERS JUDGMENT IN DEFENDANTS' FAVOR ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS. SO ORDERED. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. REPLY BRIEF FILED BY D1 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 JOSEPH MONROE 0086540 DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  12. REPLY BRIEF FILED BY D2 THE LEE QUIGLEY COMPANY #673311 RANDALL M TRAUB 0070900 DEFENDANT LEE QUIGLEY COMPANY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  13. OBJECTION FILED BY P1 WILFRED ANDERSON ATTORNEY PRO SE 9999999 PLAINTIFF'S COMBINED MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  14. DATE 12/01/2025 (NUNC PRO TUNC ENTRY AS OF & FOR 11/21/2025) UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, THE COURT DENIES PLAINTIFF'S COMBINED MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND FOR DEFERRAL OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT RULING PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 56(F). THE COURT FINDS PLAINTIFF HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED HE IS ENTITLED TO AN ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY OR A CONTINUANCE UNDER CIVIL RULE 56(F). ANY OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DUE 12/09/2025. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, THE COURT DENIES PLAINTIFF'S COMBINED MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND FOR DEFERRAL OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT RULING PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 56(F). THE COURT FINDS PLAINTIFF HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED HE IS NOT ENTITLED TO AN ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY OR A CONTINUANCE UNDER CIVIL RULE 56(F). ANY OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DUE 12/09/2025. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. WHILE PLAINTIFF'S CIVIL RULE 56(F) MOTION REMAINS PENDING, THE COURT EXTENDS THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO 12/09/2025. ALL OTHER DATES ARE UNCHANGED. NOTICE ISSUED
  17. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO DEFINE THE SCOPE OF THE COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE DEFENSE AND FOR INSTRUCTION REGARDING LITIGATION MISCONDUCT, FILED 11/03/2025, IS HELD IN ABEYANCE. BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION TO ANY MOTION IN LIMINE WILL BE DUE 7 DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY D1 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 JOSEPH MONROE 0086540 DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'SCOMBINED MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND FOR DEFERRAL PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 56(F)
  19. MOTION IN LIMINE MOTION IN LIMINE TO DEFINE THE SCOPE OF THE COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE DEFENSE AND FOR INSTRUCTION REGARDING LITIGATION MISCONDUCT
  20. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DECLARE VOID PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR DETERMINATION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO PRECLUDE ITS USE AS A DEFENSE, FILED 10/20/2025, IS DENIED IN PART. THE COURT FINDS PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DECLARE VOID THE PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR DETERMINATION IS NOT WELL-TAKEN AND DENIES SAME. THE COURT DECLINES TO STRIKE ANY PRIOR REFERENCE BY DEFENDANTS TO PLAINTIFF'S VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR STATUS. THE COURT WILL CONSIDER THE MERITS OF DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, REGARDLESS OF PLAINTIFF'S VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR STATUS. PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER, PRETRIAL MOTIONS ARE DUE 14 DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. THAT IS THE APPROPRIATE TIME FOR THE COURT TO CONSIDER MOTIONS IN LIMINE ADDRESSING WHAT MAY BE PRESENTED TO THE JURY. NOTICE ISSUED
  21. MOTION FILED FOR P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DECLARE VOID PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR DETERMINATION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO PRECLUDE ITS USE AS A DEFENSE
  22. MOTION FILED FOR P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 PLAINTIFF'S COMBINED MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND FOR DEFERRAL OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT RULING PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 56(F)
  23. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  24. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED DEFENDANT THE LEE QUIGLEY COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF
  25. NOTICE OF TRANSCRIPT FILED D2 THE LEE QUIGLEY COMPANY #673311, RANDALL M TRAUB 0070900 DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT OF PLAINTIFF WILFRED ANDERSON
  26. THE COURT DENIES PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S MAY 15, 2025 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DECLARE VOID PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR DETERMINATION. NOTICE ISSUED
  27. BRIEF FILED BY P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT'S MAY 15, 2025 ORDER
  28. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY D1 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 KATHLEEN MEREDITH KENNEDY 0103119 DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT'S MAY 15, 2025 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DECLARE VOID PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR DETERMINATION
  29. MOTION FILED FOR P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S MAY 15, 2025 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DECLARE VOID PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR DETERMINATION
  30. CMC BY PHONE HELD ON 05/21/2025. PLAINTIFF APPEARED PRO SE. DEFENDANTS APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. ALL PARTIES AGREED TO THE FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE: FACT DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY 08/22/2025. RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES, REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, OR REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS ARE DUE 28 DAYS AFTER THE REQUESTS ARE MAILED OR EMAILED. PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 08/29/2025. DEFENDANT'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 10/10/2025. DISPOSITIVE MOTION TO BE FILED BY 10/17/2025. OPPOSITION TO ANY MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DUE 28 DAYS AFTER THE MOTION IS FILED. OPPOSITION TO ANY OTHER MOTION IS DUE 14 DAYS AFTER THE MOTION IS FILED. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 01/14/2026 AT 01:00 PM. PARTIES WITH FULL SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY MUST BE PRESENT. PLAINTIFF MUST SUBMIT A DEMAND TO DEFENDANT AT LEAST 14 DAYS PRIOR TO THE FINAL PRETRIAL. ALL PARTIES MUST SUBMIT A PRETRIAL STATEMENT THAT INCLUDES THE STATUS OF SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS TO THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY AT LEAST 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE FINAL PRETRIAL. JURY TRIAL SET FOR 02/18/2026 AT 09:30 AM. ALL PRETRIAL MOTIONS ARE DUE FOURTEEN DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. BRIEFING DEADLINES FOR ALL OTHER MOTIONS ARE GOVERNED BY THE OHIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (SEE RULE 6). TRANSCRIPTS OF ANY TRIAL DEPOSITIONS ARE DUE SEVEN DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. PLAINTIFF IS CURRENTLY PROCEEDING PRO SE (WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY). THE COURT ADVISES PLAINTIFF THAT A PRO SE LITIGANT IS PRESUMED TO HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW AND OF CORRECT LEGAL PROCEDURE AND IS HELD TO THE SAME STANDARD AS ALL OTHER LITIGANTS. SEE KILROY V. B.H. LAKESHORE CO., 111 OHIO APP.3D 357 (8TH DIST.1996). THE COURT ENCOURAGES PLAINTIFF TO CONTACT THE COURT RESOURCE CENTER AT 216-443-8204 OR MAKE AN APPOINTMENT AT HTTPS://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/COURT-RESOURCE-CENTER/ TO ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS. NOTICE ISSUED
  31. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION OF THE ARGUMENTS THEREIN, THE COURT DENIES PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DECLARE VOID PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR DETERMINATION. NOTICE ISSUED
  32. BRIEF FILED BY P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO THE ANSWER OF DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DECLARE VOID PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR DETERMINATION
  33. ANSWER FILED BY D1 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 ATTORNEY JOSEPH MONROE 0086540 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  34. DOCKET HAS BEEN STRICKEN BY ORDER OF THE COURT (DOCKET 195209538 04/25/2025 BR)
  35. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 05/21/2025 AT 11:30 AM. PLAINTIFF AND DEFENSE COUNSEL SHOULD CALL 425-436-6325 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 160911#. IF ANY PARTY HAS DIFFICULTY WITH THE CONFERENCE LINE, THEY SHOULD CALL THE COURT DIRECTLY AT 216-443-8579. NOTICE ISSUED
  36. PLAINTIFF IS CURRENTLY PROCEEDING PRO SE (WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY). THE COURT ADVISES PLAINTIFF THAT A PRO SE LITIGANT IS PRESUMED TO HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW AND OF CORRECT LEGAL PROCEDURE AND IS HELD TO THE SAME STANDARD AS ALL OTHER LITIGANTS. SEE KILROY V. B.H. LAKESHORE CO., 111 OHIO APP.3D 357 (8TH DIST.1996). THE COURT PREVIOUSLY FOUND THAT PLAINTIFF IS AN INDIGENT LITIGANT AND WAIVED THE PRPEAYMENT OF COSTS OR FEES IN THIS MATTER. THE COURT CAUTIONS PLAINTIFF THAT THE RULING APPLIES ONLY TO -PREPAYMENT- OF COSTS OR FEES. PLAINTIFF MAY BE ASSESSED COSTS OR FEES AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE CASE DEPENDING ON THE CASE'S RESOLUTION. NOTICE ISSUED
  37. THE COURT GRANTS DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S MOTION TO STRIKE AND STRIKES PLAINTIFF'S SUR-REPLY, FILED 04/25/2025. NOTICE ISSUED
  38. PLAINTIFF ATTACHED BRIEFS IN SUPPORT/MOTIONS TO HIS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. THE COURT FINDS THOSE MOTIONS ARE NOT WELL-TAKEN AND DENIES THEM. NOTICE ISSUED
  39. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, THE COURT FINDS DEFENDANT DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS NOT WELL-TAKEN AND DENIES SAME. NOTICE ISSUED
  40. OBJECTION FILED BY P1 WILFRED ANDERSON ATTORNEY PRO SE 9999999 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S SUR-REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
  41. MOTION FILED FOR D1 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 KATHLEEN MEREDITH KENNEDY 0103119 DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S COMBINED MOTION TO STRIKE AND BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXCEPTION TO NEW RULE, MOTION TO DECLARE VOID PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR DETERMINATION, AND SUR-REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
  42. REPLY BRIEF FILED BY D1 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 JOSEPH MONROE 0086540 DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED BY VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR WILFRED L. ANDERSON, MD
  43. BRIEF FILED BY P1 WILFRED ANDERSON PRO SE 9999999 PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS
  44. CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 56031826 ADDRESSED TO THE LEE QUIGLEY COMPANY #673311(D2) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  45. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 WILFRED ANDERSON ATTORNEY PRO SE 9999999 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF PRAYER
  46. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED DEFENDANT JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED BY VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR WILFRED L. ANDERSON, MD
  47. STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD FILED STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD AND JOURNAL ENTRY
  48. ANSWER FILED BY D2 THE LEE QUIGLEY COMPANY #673311 ATTORNEY RANDALL M TRAUB 0070900 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT THE LEE QUIGLEY COMPANY TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  49. PURSUANT TO SUPERINTENDENCE RULE 36, THIS MATTER IS REASSIGNED TO THE DOCKET OF JUDGE HOLLIE L GALLAGHER (352) (MANUAL). REFILE OF CASE NO. CV 24 999573. NOTICE ISSUED
  50. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56031825 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/08/2025 JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 PROCESSED BY COC 02/12/2025.
  51. POVERTY AFFIDAVIT FILED IN THIS CASE. NO EVIDENCE HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO THE CONTRARY. THE APPLICATION FEE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS MATTER IS HEREBY WAIVED. NOTICE ISSUED
  52. SUMS COMPLAINT(56031826) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE LEE QUIGLEY COMPANY #673311 CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 4400 EASTON COMMONS WAY, SUITE 125 COLUMBUS, OH 43219
  53. SUMS COMPLAINT(56031825) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JACK CLEVELAND CASINO LLC #1982656 CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 4400 EASTON COMMONS WAY, SUITE 125 COLUMBUS, OH 43219
  54. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  55. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  56. WRIT FEE
  57. WRIT FEE
  58. JUDGE EMILY HAGAN ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  59. LEGAL RESEARCH
  60. LEGAL AID
  61. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  62. COMPUTER FEE
  63. CLERK'S FEE
  64. LEGAL NEWS
  65. AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY, FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more