Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-20
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 31 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Jefferson Capital Systems
Defendant Rian Ficklin
Photo of Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Judge

Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57940157) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: RIAN FICKLIN 3533 RANDOLPH RD CLEVELAND, OH 44121
  3. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57940156) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: W. ANDERSON WOODFORD [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57940155) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CHRISTINA WORLEY DAVENPORT [email protected]
  6. THE PLAINTIFF HAVING FILED A NOTICE OF DISMISSAL ON AUGUST 25, 2025, CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 08/27/2025 AT 09:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  8. TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 08/27/2025 AT 09:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  9. NOTICE FILED BY P1 JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS ATTORNEY CHRISTINA WORLEY DAVENPORT 0097133 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
  10. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  11. THIS CASE WAS CALLED FOR A DEFAULT HEARING ON JULY 31, 2025, AS SCHEDULED. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL AND THE DEFENDANT APPEARED PRO SE. THE PLAINTIFF DID NOT FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. AS A RESULT, A TRIAL IS SET FOR THE DATE AND TIME SHOWN BELOW. TRIAL SET FOR 08/27/2025 AT 09:00 AM. COURTROOM 18-D. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS ATTORNEY W. ANDERSON WOODFORD 0101686 AFFIDAVIT OF HEARING
  13. A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WAS HELD AS SCHEDULED ON JUNE 26, 2025. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. THE PLAINTIFF DID NOT APPEAR AND IS IN DEFAULT OF AN ANSWER. THE PLAINTIFF IS GIVEN A LEAVE UNTIL JULY 14, 2025, TO FILE A CIVIL RULE 55 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND A HEARING ON SUCH MOTION IS SET FOR THE DATE AND TIME SHOWN BELOW. FAILURE TO FILE THE MOTION WILL RESULT IN A DISMISSAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. DEFAULT HEARING IS SET FOR 07/31/2025 AT 10:00 AM IN COURTROOM 18-D. PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY SHALL BRING JUDGMENT ENTRY; AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT ACCORDING TO STATUTE AND RULES, SERVICE REQUIREMENTS WERE COMPLIED WITH; AND AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF, OR PLAINTIFF'S REPRESENTATIVE, PROVING DAMAGES. PLAINTIFF TO NOTIFY ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL. SAID LETTER ALSO SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE: "JUDGMENT MAY BE RENDERED AGAINST YOU." NOTICE ISSUED
  14. THIS CASE WAS CALLED FOR A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON APRIL 22, 2025, AS SCHEDULED. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL AND THE DEFENDANT PRO SE CONTACTED THE COURT BY TELEPHONE. THE DEFENDANT HAS UNTIL MAY 12, 2025, TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT. ANOTHER PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SET AS FOLLOWS: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 06/26/2025 AT 10:00 AM. COURTROOM 18-D. THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD AS A DEFAULT HEARING IN THE EVENT THE DEFENDANT IS IN DEFAULT OF AN ANSWER AND THE PLAINTIFF FILES A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST HER NO LATER THAN JUNE 12, 2025. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. SUMS COMPLAINT(56664418) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: RIAN FICKLIN 3533 RANDOLPH RD CLEVELAND, OH 44121 ANSWER DATE: 05/12/2025
  16. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. WRIT FEE
  18. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR ORDINARY MAIL
  19. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56205761 RETURNED 4/1/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT FICKLIN/RIAN/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  20. SUMS COMPLAINT(56205761) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RIAN FICKLIN 3533 RANDOLPH RD CLEVELAND, OH 44121
  21. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. WRIT FEE
  23. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 04/22/2025 AT 11:15 AM. COURTROOM 18-D. NOTICE ISSUED
  24. JUDGE JOHN P O'DONNELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  25. LEGAL RESEARCH
  26. LEGAL NEWS
  27. LEGAL AID
  28. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  29. COMPUTER FEE
  30. CLERK'S FEE
  31. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID CHRISTINA WORLEY DAVENPORT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more