Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of New Britain County

Court

New Britain County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-20
Type P 90 Property All Other
Docket 18 entries
Disposition judgment after completed trial to the court - hearing in damages

Parties

Plaintiff The K. Pulaski Democratic Club Of New Britain, Conn. Incorporated
Defendant Raymond Szajkowski|Non Appearing
Photo of Hon. Joseph Shortall

Judge

Hon. Joseph Shortall

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. JUDGMENT FILE
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. RETURN OF SERVICE
  4. MOTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 RESULT: Granted 5/16/2025 BY THE CLERK
  5. ORDER RESULT: Granted 5/16/2025 BY THE CLERK
  6. MOTION FOR DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT PB 17-33 RESULT: Denied 7/21/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  7. ORDER RESULT: Denied 7/21/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  8. CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  9. PROPOSED ORDER
  10. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Order 11/5/2025 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  11. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/5/2025 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  12. AFFIDAVIT
  13. ORDER RESULT: Order 1/7/2026 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  14. JUDGMENT AFTER COMPLETED TRIAL TO THE COURT - HEARING IN DAMAGES RESULT: HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  15. PROPOSED JUDGMENT FILE RESULT: Rejected 1/20/2026 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  16. ORDER RESULT: Rejected 1/20/2026 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  17. PROPOSED JUDGMENT FILE RESULT: Order 2/9/2026 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  18. ORDER RESULT: Order 2/9/2026 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more