Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-20
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 30 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant Richard Woodson
Photo of Hon. Emily Hagan

Judge

Hon. Emily Hagan

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. GARNISHMENT CASE NUMBER GR-25-029386
  3. CASE REFUND TO WELTMAN WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A.
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57348883) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: RICHARD WOODSON 3493 BENDEMEER RD CLEVELAND, OH 44118
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57348882) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID A HEAD [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57348881) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID A HEAD [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57348880) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: TED M TRAUT [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57348879) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: TED M TRAUT [email protected]
  9. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING HELD 06/24/2025. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 05/13/2025, IS GRANTED. THE COURT HEREBY RENDERS JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, AND AGAINST DEFENDANT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,604.89, PLUS INTEREST AT THE STATUTORY RATE FROM THE DATE OF THE JUDGMENT, AND THE COSTS OF THIS ACTION. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  11. NOTICE FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY DAVID A HEAD 0075201 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION
  12. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY DAVID A HEAD 0075201 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
  13. CMC BY PHONE HELD 05/01/2025. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 06/24/2025 AT 11:30 AM. ALL PARTIES TO CONTACT THE COURT AT 216-443-8583 AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. IN ORDER FOR THE HEARING TO GO FORWARD, PLAINTIFF MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AT LEAST 14 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE, AND ELECTRONICALLY PROVIDE TO THE COURT: (1) A JUDGMENT ENTRY; (2) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT ACCORDING TO STATUTE AND RULES, SERVICE REQUIREMENTS WERE MET; (3) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT A SEARCH HAS BEEN CONDUCTED AND DEFENDANT IS NOT A CURRENT MEMBER OF THE MILITARY; AND (4) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF, OR PLAINTIFF'S REPRESENTATIVE, PROVING DAMAGES. PLAINTIFF TO NOTIFY ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE. PLAINTIFF TO ELECTRONICALLY SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT PRIOR TO THE HEARING. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. SUMS COMPLAINT(56561120) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: RICHARD WOODSON 3493 BENDEMEER RD CLEVELAND, OH 44118 ANSWER DATE: 04/30/2025
  15. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  16. WRIT FEE
  17. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE BY ORDINARY MAIL
  18. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 05/01/2025 AT 09:00 AM COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S), OR PLAINTIFF(S), IF PROCEEDING PRO SE, SHALL INITIATE THE CONFERENCE CALL WITH ALL OTHER PARTIES, AND THEN CONTACT THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY AT 216-443-8583. ANY ATTORNEY OR UNREPRESENTED PARTY WHO IS NOT AVAILABLE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED HIS/HER PARTICIPATION AND TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE CASE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF EACH PARTY TO ENSURE THE CLERK OF COURT'S OFFICE LISTS A CORRECT PHONE NUMBER FOR THAT PARTY. PARTIES SHOULD NOT WAIT FOR THE CMC BEFORE BEGINNING TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56202038 RETURNED 3/17/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WOODSON/RICHARD/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  20. SUMS COMPLAINT(56202038) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RICHARD WOODSON 3493 BENDEMEER RD CLEVELAND, OH 44118
  21. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. WRIT FEE
  23. JUDGE EMILY HAGAN ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  24. LEGAL RESEARCH
  25. LEGAL NEWS
  26. LEGAL AID
  27. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  28. COMPUTER FEE
  29. CLERK'S FEE
  30. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID A HEAD

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more