Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Ingham County

Court

Ingham County

Michigan

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-15
Status CLOSED
Docket 23 entries
Disposition summary disposition

Parties

Plaintiff Michigan Occupational Safety And Health Administra
Defendant Asplundh Tree Experts
Photo of Hon. Wanda Stokes

Judge

Hon. Wanda Stokes

Ingham County (MI)

Michigan

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. COMPLAINT FILED RECEIPT: 531079 DATE: 01/15/2025
  2. RECORDER/REPORTER'S NOTICE OF FILING OF TRANSCRIPT
  3. CASE CLOSED C30
  4. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION PURSUANT TO MCR 2.116C3 AND MCR 2116 C8 -THIS IS A FINAL ORDER AND CLOSES THE CASE
  5. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION 7-DAY ORDER/WITH PROPOSED ORDER/ PROOF OF SERVICE- SEPT 12, 2025
  6. GRANTED ON THE RECORD THE FOLLOWING EVENT: MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION SCHEDULED FOR 09/10/2025 AT 1:45 PM HAS BEEN RESULTED AS FOLLOWS: RESULT: GRANTED JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: COURTROOM 7 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT STAFF: 0001
  7. DEFENDANT REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION PURSUANT TO MCR 211C3 AND MCR211C8 WITH PROOF SERVICE
  8. MIOSHA'S RESPONSE TO ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERTS LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION - ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED WITH PROOF OF SERVICE
  9. STIPULATION AND ORDER ADJOURNING THE JULY 24, 2025 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
  10. RE -NOTICE OF HEARING WITH PROOF OF SERVICE
  11. HEARING ADJOURNED THE FOLLOWING EVENT: MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION SCHEDULED FOR 07/24/2025 AT 10:00 AM HAS BEEN RESULTED AS FOLLOWS: RESULT: C30 ADJOURNED JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: COURTROOM 7 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT STAFF: 0001
  12. HEARING SET: THE FOLLOWING EVENT: MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION SCHEDULED FOR 07/24/2025 AT 10:00 AM HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED AS FOLLOWS: EVENT: MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION DATE: 09/10/2025 TIME: 1:45 PM JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATIO0001
  13. HELD BUT NOT ON THE RECORD THE FOLLOWING EVENT: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 05/07/2025 AT 8:30 AM HAS BEEN RESULTED AS FOLLOWS: RESULT: HELD BUT NOT ON RECORD JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: COURTROOM 7 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT S0001
  14. STIPULATION AND ORDER ADJOURNING THE MAY, 2025 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
  15. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION PURSUANT TO MCR 2.116 C3 AND MCR 2.116C8
  16. MOTION FEE RECEIPT: 534509 DATE: 04/17/2025
  17. NOTICE OF HEARING WITH POS
  18. HEARING SET: EVENT: MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION DATE: 07/24/2025 TIME: 10:00 AM JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: COURTROOM 7 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT: C30 ADJOURNED
  19. HEARING SET: EVENT: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DATE: 05/07/2025 TIME: 8:30 AM JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: COURTROOM 7 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT: HELD BUT NOT ON RECORD
  20. ORDER AND NOTICE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
  21. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER
  22. PROOF OF SERVICE
  23. SUMMONS ISSUED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more