Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Docket Entries
- ###PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
- OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
- 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
- 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- EPO ISSD WCSO - HRG 02/07/25 @ 9 AM
- ORIG EPO & RETURN - SRVD 01/31/25
- DS/MIN 2-7-25 PO DKT MOORE FOR LUTON: PLT P (PRO SE). DEF P W/ATTY STEVE MONEY. MATTER COMES ON FOR EPO HEARING. DEF'S ATTY REQUEST DISMISSAL FOR PLT FAILING TO ATTACH POLICE REPORT AS REQUIRED BY STATUTE. PLT PRESENTS POLICE REPORT IN COURT. COPIES MADE FOR COURT AND PARTIES. DEF W/ATTY REVIEWS REPORT. WITS SWORN, TESTIMONY TAKEN [PLT], ARUGMENTS HEARD. DEF DEMURRS TO THE EVIDENCE. COURT OVERRULES DEF'S DEMURR. DEF CALLS DUSTON TODD INVESTIGATOR FOR LIGHTHORSE {CREEK NATION}. MR. TODD TESTIFIES THAT MR. JOHNSON/DEF IS NOT THE ONE THAT CREATED THE FAKE PROFILE AND THERE IS NO ANTICIPATED ACTION TO BE TAKEN AGAINST MR. JOHNSON/DEF IN RE: TO PLTS ALLEGATIONS. DEF DOES NOT TESTIFY. THE COURT FINDS: SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE FOR TEMPORARY ORDER FOR SIXTY (60) DAYS. REVIEW 4-7-25 AT 9AM. IF NO NEW VIOLATIONS EPO TO BE DISMISSED.
- TEMP EPO - (60) DAY REVIEW
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In