Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-21
Type Protective Order
Docket 31 entries
Disposition dismissed
Photo of Hon. Luton John David

Judge

Hon. Luton John David

Wagoner County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. ###PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  4. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  5. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  6. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  7. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  8. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  9. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  10. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  11. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  12. EPO MAILED TCSO - HRG 02/03/25 @ 9 AM
  13. ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASE W/ FD-24-183 (LUTON)
  14. CONT'D EPO - HRG 02/06/25 @ 3:30 PM (LUTON)
  15. DS/MIN 2-3-25 PO DKT LUTON: PLT P W/ ATTY MIKE MATHIS. DEF P. DEF HAS FILED HER OWN PO IN TULSA COUNTY. PO-25-350 IN FRONT OF JUDGE KELLER 2-13-25 AT 9AM. PLT HAS NOT BEEN SERVED DEF'S TULSA COUNTY PO. THE COURT WILL INFORM JUDGE KELLER OF PENDING PO-25-22 IN WAGONER COUNTY TO BE HEARD IN WAGONER COUNTY 2-6-25 AT 3:30 PM. AT DEF'S REQUEST FOR TIME TO HIRE ATTY. ALL PARTIES RECOGNIZED BACK 2-6-25 AT 3:30 PM
  16. ORIG EPO & RETURN - SRVD 01/30/25
  17. MINUTE ORDER - DISMISSED; COST WAIVED
  18. FEES ADJUSTED TO ZERO
  19. FEES ADJUSTED TO ZERO
  20. FEES ADJUSTED TO ZERO
  21. FEES ADJUSTED TO ZERO
  22. FEES ADJUSTED TO ZERO
  23. FEES ADJUSTED TO ZERO
  24. FEES ADJUSTED TO ZERO
  25. FEES ADJUSTED TO ZERO
  26. FEES ADJUSTED TO ZERO
  27. FEES ADJUSTED TO ZERO
  28. FEES ADJUSTED TO ZERO
  29. FEES ADJUSTED TO ZERO
  30. DS/MIN 2-6-25 DIV DKT LUTON: PET P W/ ATTY MIKE MATHIS. RESP P (PRO SE). MATTER COMES ON FOR FD-24-183: PTC-PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO USE APP FOR COMMUNICATION ("APPCLOSE") FOR COMMUNICATION PARTIES ARE ONLY TO COMMUNIATE RE: THE MINOR CHILD. PARTES TO FOLLOW STANDARD WAGONER COUNTY HOLIDAY VISITATION SCHEDULE. PET'S ATTY TO PREPARE ORDER. PARTIES TO CIRCULATE A PTC ORDER. PO-25-22: MR. REED PLT P W/ATTY MIKE MATHIS. DEF MS. REED P (PRO SE). MATTER COMES ON FOR EPO HEARING. MATTER PREVIOULSY BEING CONSOLIDATED W/FD-24-183 AND FOR JUDICIAL ECONOMY HEARD W/ PO-25-44(TRANSFERRED FROM TULSA COUNTY). WITS SWORN, TESTIMONY TAKEN. ARUGMENTS HEARD. COURT FINDS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE FOR A FINAL PROTETIVE ORDER. EPO IS DISMISSED; COST WAIVED. PO-25-44 (TRANSFERRED FROM TULSA COUNTY): MS. REED PLT P (PRO SE). DEF MR. REED P W/ATTY MIKE MATHIS. MATTER COMES ON FOR EPO HEARING. MATTER PREVIOULSY BEING CONSOLIDATED W/FD-24-183 AND FOR JUDICIAL ECONOMY HEARD W/ PO-25-22. WITS SWORN, TESTIMONY TAKEN. ARUGMENTS HEARD. COURT FINDS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE FOR A FINAL PROTETIVE ORDER. EPO IS DISMISSED; COST WAIVED.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more