Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-07
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 56 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant Natasha Durham
Photo of Hon. Ashley Kilbane

Judge

Hon. Ashley Kilbane

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59102309) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: NATASHA DURHAM 16609 GLENPARK AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59102308) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN S. BUNDY [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59102307) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN S. BUNDY [email protected]
  5. PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO PERFECT SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT ON DEFENDANT WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF FILING. PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S PREVIOUS ORDER ISSUED ON 11/26/2025, PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY SERVICE WAS NOT MADE AND THEREFORE, THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REFLECTS THAT PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO OBTAIN SERVICE ON DEFENDANT(S) WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT, PURSUANT TO OHIO CIVIL RULE 4(E), PLAINTIFF WILL BE GIVEN UNTIL 12/18/2025 TO OBTAIN SERVICE ON DEFENDANT(S). UNLESS PLAINTIFF CAN SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY SERVICE WAS NOT MADE, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 12/18/2025 AT 10:45 AM. PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 21, PART I, THE COURT WILL CONDUCT A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. DISCOVERY SCHEDULE, AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY, EXCHANGE OF EXPERT REPORTS, DATE FOR FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO ARBITRATION, ETC., SHALL BE RESOLVED AND INCLUDED IN A BINDING DECREE AND ORDER FORMALIZED. ALL COUNSEL ATTENDING SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A BINDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL INITIATE THE CONFERENCE CALL WITH ALL OTHER PARTIES AND CONTACT THE COURT AT THE APPOINTED TIME AT 216-443-8618. PARTIES SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS DISCOVERY PROGRESS AND SCHEDULING MATTERS, ETC. COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES SHALL FOLLOW THE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN CIVIL RULE 26(F) IN PREPARATION FOR THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. REGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 58533361 RETURNED 11/13/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT DURHAM/NATASHA/ ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  8. SUMS COMPLAINT(58533361) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: NATASHA DURHAM 16609 GLENPARK AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44128 ANSWER DATE: 11/24/2025
  9. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  10. WRIT FEE
  11. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE BY ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE
  12. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 58210126 RETURNED 10/16/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT DURHAM/NATASHA/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  13. STATUS CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 09/30/2025 AT 10:30 AM IS CANCELLED.
  14. SUMS COMPLAINT(58210126) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NATASHA DURHAM 5100 LEE ROAD, APT. 17 MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137-0000
  15. P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION'S MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, FILED 09/23/2025, IS GRANTED. CMC BY PHONE RESET AS FOLLOWS: CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 11/20/2025 AT 11:00 AM. PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 21, PART I, THE COURT WILL CONDUCT A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. DISCOVERY SCHEDULE, AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY, EXCHANGE OF EXPERT REPORTS, DATE FOR FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO ARBITRATION, ETC., SHALL BE RESOLVED AND INCLUDED IN A BINDING DECREE AND ORDER FORMALIZED. ALL COUNSEL ATTENDING SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A BINDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL INITIATE THE CONFERENCE CALL WITH ALL OTHER PARTIES AND CONTACT THE COURT AT THE APPOINTED TIME AT 216-443-8618. PARTIES SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS DISCOVERY PROGRESS AND SCHEDULING MATTERS, ETC. COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES SHALL FOLLOW THE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN CIVIL RULE 26(F) IN PREPARATION FOR THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. WRIT FEE
  18. P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. RYAN S. BUNDY 0090027
  19. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
  20. STATUS CONFERENCE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 09/11/2025 AT 11:00 AM IS RESCHEDULED FOR 09/30/2025 AT 10:30 AM (Notice Sent).
  21. STATUS CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 09/11/2025 AT 11:00 AM IS CANCELLED. JUDGE: ASHLEY KILBANE (374) REASON: RESET TO 09/30/2025 AT 10:30 AM (notice sent).
  22. REGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 56760421 RETURNED 05/15/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT DURHAM/NATASHA/ NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  23. SUMS COMPLAINT(56786568) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: NATASHA DURHAM 16609 GLENPARK AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44128 ANSWER DATE: 05/23/2025
  24. STATUS CONFERENCE SET FOR 09/11/2025 AT 11:00 AM. THIS DATE IS SET TO CHECK WHETHER SERVICE HAS BEEN PERFECTED ON DEFENDANT. NOTICE ISSUED
  25. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PERFECT SERVICE, FILED 04/18/2025, IS GRANTED. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO OBTAIN SERVICE ON DEFENDANT(S) BY SEPTEMBER 8, 2025, THIS CASE WILL BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO OHIO CIVIL RULE 4(E), UNLESS PLAINTIFF CAN SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY SERVICE WAS NOT MADE. NOTICE ISSUED
  26. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. WRIT FEE
  28. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE BY ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE
  29. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 04/30/2025 AT 02:00 PM IS CANCELLED.
  30. SUMS COMPLAINT(56760421) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: NATASHA DURHAM 16609 GLENPARK AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44128 ANSWER DATE: 05/21/2025
  31. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  32. WRIT FEE
  33. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE
  34. P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RYAN S. BUNDY 0090027. ^F^ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PERFECT SERVICE
  35. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56441931 RETURNED 4/15/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT DURHAM/NATASHA/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  36. NOTICE FILED BY P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION ATTORNEY RYAN S. BUNDY 0090027 NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND DISCOVERY PLAN
  37. SUMS COMPLAINT(56441931) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NATASHA DURHAM 16609 GLENPARK AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  38. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  39. WRIT FEE
  40. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE BY CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE
  41. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR DURHAM/NATASHA/ 03/08/2025 17:01:58
  42. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR BUNDY/RYAN/S. 03/08/2025 17:01:58
  43. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/30/2025 AT 02:00 PM. PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 21, PART I, THE COURT WILL CONDUCT A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. DISCOVERY SCHEDULE, AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY, EXCHANGE OF EXPERT REPORTS, DATE FOR FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO ARBITRATION, ETC., SHALL BE RESOLVED AND INCLUDED IN A BINDING DECREE AND ORDER FORMALIZED. ALL COUNSEL ATTENDING SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A BINDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER . PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL INITIATE THE CONFERENCE CALL WITH ALL OTHER PARTIES AND CONTACT THE COURT AT THE APPOINTED TIME AT 216-443-8618. PARTIES SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS DISCOVERY PROGRESS AND SCHEDULING MATTERS, ETC. COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES SHALL FOLLOW THE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN CIVIL RULE 26(F) IN PREPARATION FOR THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
  44. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55768390 RETURNED 01/25/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT DURHAM/NATASHA/ - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  45. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55768390 RETURNED 1/25/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT DURHAM/NATASHA/ - MOVED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  46. SUMS COMPLAINT(55768390) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NATASHA DURHAM 16609 GLENPARK AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  47. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  48. WRIT FEE
  49. JUDGE ASHLEY KILBANE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  50. LEGAL RESEARCH
  51. LEGAL NEWS
  52. LEGAL AID
  53. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  54. COMPUTER FEE
  55. CLERK'S FEE
  56. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID RYAN S. BUNDY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more