Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-14
Status INACTIVE
Type Commercial Docket
Docket 35 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Encore Funding Ii, Llc
Defendant Shopno I, Llc|Faisal Farhana|Ruheen Miah
Photo of Hon. Cassandra Collier Williams

Judge

Hon. Cassandra Collier Williams

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58809049) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JOHN D. RAMSEY [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58809048) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID S BLOCKER [email protected]
  4. THE COURT HAVING ISSUED JUDGMENT IN THIS MATTER IN ITS JOURNAL ENTRY OF 05/01/2025, THIS CASE IS HEREBY REMOVED FROM THE COURT'S ACTIVE DOCKET. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  5. DATE 04/30/2025 (NUNC PRO TUNC ENTRY AS OF & FOR 04/03/2025) PURSUANT TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL (TITLE 28 U.S. CODE 1441, ET SEQ.) (FILED 03/25/2025), THE CAPTIONED CASE IS TRANSFERRED TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (CASE NO. 1:25-CV-00582) AND THIS COURT SHALL PROCEED NO FURTHER UNLESS AND UNTIL THE CASE IS REMANDED. SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56153020 RETURNED 03/19/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SHOPNO I, LLC - UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  7. PURSUANT TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL (TITLE 28 U.S. CODE 1441, ET SEQ.) (FILED 03/25/2025), THE CAPTIONED CASE IS TRANSFERRED TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (CASE NO. 1:25-CV-00582) AND THIS COURT SHALL PROCEED NO FURTHER UNLESS AND UNTIL THE CASE IS REMANDED. SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 04/03/2025 AT 02:00 PM IS CANCELLED.
  9. NOTICE FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) SHOPNO I, LLC(D1), FAISAL FARHANA(D2) and RUHEEN MIAH(D3) ATTORNEY MICHAEL DAVIS HOENIG 0093237 DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL
  10. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56153020 RETURNED 3/19/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SHOPNO I, LLC - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  11. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 04/03/2025 AT 02:00 PM. THE DEFAULT HEARING SHALL BE HELD BY PHONE. PLAINTIFF SHALL APPEAR AT ALL OTHER PREVIOUSLY SET COURT DATES. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 978-990-5000 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 701774# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL MUST FILE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, EVEN IF THEY HAVE ALREADY BEEN ATTACHED TO THE COMPLAINT OR MOTION, NO LATER THAN 04/02/2025. FAILURE TO FILE ANY OF THESE ITEMS BY SAID DATE SHALL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION: 1. THE CONTRACT(S), ASSIGNMENT(S), OR WRITTEN INSTRUMENT(S) UPON WHICH PLAINTIFF SEEKS JUDGMENT -- EVEN IF ALREADY ATTACHED TO THE COMPLAINT OR MOTION. FAILURE TO FILE THIS ITEM WILL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. JUDGMENT ENTRY REFLECTING PRINCIPAL DUE WITHOUT REGARD TO ACCRUED INTEREST. FAILURE TO FILE THIS ITEM WILL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY AVERRING COMPLIANCE WITH ALL SERVICE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES AND RULES CONTAINING ATTACHMENT(S) THAT DEMONSTRATE PROOF OF SERVICE. FAILURE TO FILE THIS ITEM WILL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4. AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF(S) OR PLAINTIFFS' REPRESENTATIVE PROVING DAMAGES. FAILURE TO FILE THIS ITEM WILL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE ANY OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED ITEMS SHALL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BEING DENIED AND PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. PROOF OF ASSIGNMENT(S) REQUIRED IN ACCOUNT CASES: PLAINTIFF(S) MUST PROVE STANDING BY PROVIDING AUTHENTICATED COPIES OF ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS OF THE ACCOUNT(S), INCLUDING THE DATE OF ASSIGNMENT, PLUS PROOF OF THE AMOUNT OF PRINCIPAL DUE & OWING AT THE TIME THE DEBT WAS CHARGED OFF BY THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR. BLANKET ASSIGNMENTS THAT CONTAIN NO REFERENCE TO THE DEBTOR'S NAME AND/OR ACCOUNT(S) WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. WITHOUT THESE ITEMS OF PROOF, DEFAULT JUDGMENT WILL NOT BE GRANTED AND THE CASE WILL BE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION PURSUANT TO CIV.R 41(B). DEFAULT: NOTIFICATION OF DEFENDANT(S): PLAINTIFFS ARE REQUIRED TO NOTIFY IN WRITING ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE HEARING DATE. NOTE: IF PLAINTIFFS HAVE NOT NOTIFIED DEFAULTING DEFENDANTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT, THEN DEFAULT JUDGMENT WILL NOT BE GRANTED AND CASE WILL BE DISMISSED. PROOF OF TIMELY MAILING OF SUCH NOTICE WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE DEFAULT HEARING. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT OR PROOF OF CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE ATTEMPTS, AVAILABLE FROM THE USPS WEBSITE, IS REQUIRED ALSO. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT ANY COURT SCHEDULED EVENT IN THE FUTURE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT RENDERED AGAINST DEFENDANT. SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56153023 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/24/2025 SHOPNO I, LLC PROCESSED BY COC 03/05/2025.
  13. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56153022 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/24/2025 MIAH/RUHEEN/ PROCESSED BY COC 03/05/2025.
  14. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56153021 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/24/2025 FARHANA/FAISAL/ PROCESSED BY COC 03/05/2025.
  15. SUMS COMPLAINT(56153023) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SHOPNO I, LLC C/O FAISAL FARHANA 97-46 93RD STREET OZONE PARK, NY 11416-0000
  16. SUMS COMPLAINT(56153022) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RUHEEN MIAH 5174 48TH STREET, FL 1, WOODSIDE, NY 11377
  17. SUMS COMPLAINT(56153021) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: FAISAL FARHANA 97-46 93RD STREET OZONE PARK, NY 11416
  18. SUMS COMPLAINT(56153020) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SHOPNO I, LLC 37-16 73RD STREET, SUITE 302 QUEENS, NY 11372
  19. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  20. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  21. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  23. WRIT FEE
  24. WRIT FEE
  25. WRIT FEE
  26. WRIT FEE
  27. JUDGE KEVIN J KELLEY ASSIGNED (RANDOM); COMMERCIAL DOCKET CASE, REASSIGNED TO JUDGE CASSANDRA COLLIER-WILLIAMS (RANDOM)
  28. JUDGE KEVIN J KELLEY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  29. LEGAL RESEARCH
  30. LEGAL NEWS
  31. LEGAL AID
  32. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  33. COMPUTER FEE
  34. CLERK'S FEE
  35. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID S BLOCKER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more