Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-14
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 26 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant Tayvon Amie
Photo of Hon. Emily Hagan

Judge

Hon. Emily Hagan

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57873733) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: TAYVON AMIE 2774 HAMPSHIRE RD APT 7 CLEVELAND HTS, OH 44106
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57873732) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57873731) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SEAN M. WINTERS [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57873730) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRIS K VELAYUDHAN [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57873729) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRIS K VELAYUDHAN [email protected]
  7. A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REFLECTS PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO OBTAIN SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT ON DEFENDANT WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF FILING. PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 4(E), AND THIS COURT'S PRIOR ORDERS, DATED 04/14/2025, 06/04/2025, AND 07/23/2025, CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. CMC BY PHONE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 07/29/2025 AT 10:30 AM IS RESCHEDULED FOR 08/27/2025 AT 10:30 AM. DUE TO LACK OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT. ALL PARTIES TO CONTACT THE COURT AT 216-443-8583 AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 4(E), FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO SERVE DEFENDANT WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF FILING MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 07/29/2025 AT 10:30 AM IS CANCELLED. JUDGE: EMILY HAGAN (373) REASON: UNKNOWN (notice sent).
  10. CMC BY PHONE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 06/18/2025 AT 09:30 AM IS RESCHEDULED FOR 07/29/2025 AT 10:30 AM. DUE TO LACK OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT. ALL PARTIES TO CONTACT THE COURT AT 216-443-8583 AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 4(E), FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO SERVE DEFENDANT(S) WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF FILING MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION AS TO ANY UNSERVED DEFENDANT. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 06/18/2025 AT 09:30 AM IS CANCELLED. JUDGE: EMILY HAGAN (373) REASON: UNKNOWN (notice sent).
  12. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 04/24/2025 AT 11:00 AM IS CONTINUED DUE TO LACK OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 06/18/2025 AT 09:30 AM. ALL PARTIES TO CONTACT THE COURT AT 216-443-8583 AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 4(E), FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO SERVE DEFENDANT(S) WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF FILING MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION AS TO ANY UNSERVED DEFENDANT(S). NOTICE ISSUED
  13. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 04/24/2025 AT 11:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  14. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/24/2025 AT 11:00 AM COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S), OR PLAINTIFF(S), IF PROCEEDING PRO SE, SHALL INITIATE THE CONFERENCE CALL WITH ALL OTHER PARTIES, AND THEN CONTACT THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY AT 216-443-8583. ANY ATTORNEY OR UNREPRESENTED PARTY WHO IS NOT AVAILABLE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED HIS/HER PARTICIPATION AND TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE CASE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF EACH PARTY TO ENSURE THE CLERK OF COURT'S OFFICE LISTS A CORRECT PHONE NUMBER FOR THAT PARTY. PARTIES SHOULD NOT WAIT FOR THE CMC BEFORE BEGINNING TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56160392 RETURNED 3/8/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AMIE/TAYVON/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  16. SUMS COMPLAINT(56160392) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: TAYVON AMIE 2774 HAMPSHIRE RD APT 7 CLEVELAND HTS, OH 44106
  17. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  18. WRIT FEE
  19. JUDGE EMILY HAGAN ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  20. LEGAL RESEARCH
  21. LEGAL NEWS
  22. LEGAL AID
  23. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  24. COMPUTER FEE
  25. CLERK'S FEE
  26. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more