Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Summit Co

Court

Summit Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-11
Type Preliminary Injunction
Docket 23 entries
Disposition dismissal without prejudice

Parties

Plaintiff Whipset, Yolanda
Defendant Ohio High School Athletic Association
Photo of Hon. Joy M Oldfield

Judge

Hon. Joy M Oldfield

Summit County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
  2. Regular Mail Service - Mailed YOLANDA DALE WHIPSET
  3. Regular Mail Service - Mailed OHIO HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
  4. Regular Mail Service - Mailed KENNETH MYERS
  5. Regular Mail Service - Mailed JOSHUA FRALEY
  6. Regular Mail Service - Mailed JOSEPH FRALEY
  7. NOTICE ISSUED WHIPSET, YOLANDA DALE
  8. NOTICE ISSUED OHIO HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
  9. NOTICE ISSUED MYERS, KENNETH
  10. NOTICE ISSUED FRALEY, JOSHUA
  11. NOTICE ISSUED FRALEY, JOSEPH
  12. NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV.R. 41(A)(1)(a)
  13. DUE TO THE COURT'S UNAVAILABILITY AND SCHEDULED CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL, THE MARCH 6, 2025 INJUNCTION HEARING IS CONTINUED TO MARCH 19, 2025 AT 1:30 P.M. THE FEBRUARY 20, 2025 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT UNTIL MARCH 19, 2025 AT 4:00 P.M., UNLESS OTHERWISE EXTENDED BY THIS COURT. BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, THE INJUNCTION HEARING WILL BE CONDUCTED VIA ZOOM. JMO
  14. IN THE INTEREST OF JUDICIAL ECONOMY AND JUSTICE AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, CASE NO. CV 2025-02-0644 SHALL BE CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. CV 2025-03-0949. ALL FURTHER PLEADINGS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CIVIL CLERK'S OFFICE FROM THIS DAY FORTH UNDER CV 2025-02-0644 CASE NUMBER. CASE NO. CV 2025-03-0949 IS TERMINATED FROM THE CIVIL DOCKET. IT IS SO ORDER. AB
  15. Certified Mail Service - Served OHIO HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
  16. CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED FROM CASE CV 2025-03-0949 TRANSFERRED TO CV 2025-02-0644
  17. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. THE REASONS DESCRIBED IN THIS ORDER, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER IS GRANTED. SEE THIS ORDER FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTION. JMO
  18. DEFENDANT OHIO HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
  19. BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, THIS MATTER IS SCHEDULED FOR A COMBINED HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 65(A) AND A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 65(B), ON FEBRUARY 14, 2025 AT 8:30 A.M. IT IS FURTHER AGREED AND ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT OSHAA SHALL FILE ANY BRIEF IN OPPOSITION ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 13, 2025 AT 12:00 P.M. JMO
  20. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail OHIO HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
  21. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEYS JOSEPH A FRALEY AND JOSHUA M FRALEY FOR DEFENDANT.
  22. CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED
  23. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more