Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Docket Entries
- CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
- JUDGMENT ENTRY(57061507) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ADRIA FRESENKO 6343 JEFFERSON ROAD ASHTABULA, OH 44004
- JUDGMENT ENTRY(57061506) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN S. BUNDY [email protected]
- JUDGMENT ENTRY(57061505) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN S. BUNDY [email protected]
- MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 04/09/2025, IS GRANTED. CASE FILED ON 01/21/2025. SERVICE PERFECTED ON DEFENDANT ADRIA FRESENKO ON 02/19/2025 BY REGULAR MAIL. HEARING ON THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WAS HELD ON 05/22/2025. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR. NO RESPONSIVE PLEADING WAS FILED ON THE COMPLAINT OR MOTION. BASED ON THE FOREGOING REASONS, THE COURT FINDS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WELL TAKEN AND GRANTED. DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTRY TO BE ISSUED BY SEPARATE ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
- DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTRY. OSJ. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
- NOTICE FILED BY P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION ATTORNEY RYAN S. BUNDY 0090027 NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
- NOTICE FILED BY P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION ATTORNEY RYAN S. BUNDY 0090027 NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
- DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 05/22/2025 AT 11:30 AM. DEFAULT HEARING BY TELEPHONE. ALL PARTIES TO CALL (216) 443-8577 AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. IN ORDER FOR THE DEFAULT HEARING TO GO FORWARD, PLAINTIFF MUST PROVIDE TO THE COURT: (1) A JUDGMENT ENTRY; (2) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT ACCORDING TO STATUTE AND RULES, SERVICE REQUIREMENTS WERE MET; (3) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT A SEARCH HAS BEEN CONDUCTED AND DEFENDANT IS NOT A CURRENT MEMBER OF THE MILITARY; AND (4) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF, OR PLAINTIFF'S REPRESENTATIVE, PROVING DAMAGES. PLAINTIFF TO NOTIFY ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AND THE TELEPHONE NUMBER TO CALL BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE AND PRESENT AN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO SUCH SERVICE AT THE DEFAULT HEARING. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. FAILURE OF DEFENDANT(S) TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN DEFAULT JUDGMENT BEING GRANTED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF. NOTICE ISSUED
- CASE CALLED FOR DEFAULT HEARING 05/01/2025. PLAINTIFF FAILED TO FILE NOTICE OF DEFAULT HEARING AND FAILED TO CALL IN. DEFAULT HEARING TO BE RE-SET BY SEPARATE ENTRY. SECOND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S REQUIREMENTS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENTS WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. NOTICE ISSUED
- DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 05/01/2025 AT 11:45 AM. DEFAULT HEARING BY TELEPHONE. ALL PARTIES TO CALL (216) 443-8577 AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. IN ORDER FOR THE DEFAULT HEARING TO GO FORWARD, PLAINTIFF MUST PROVIDE TO THE COURT: (1) A JUDGMENT ENTRY; (2) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT ACCORDING TO STATUTE AND RULES, SERVICE REQUIREMENTS WERE MET; (3) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT A SEARCH HAS BEEN CONDUCTED AND DEFENDANT IS NOT A CURRENT MEMBER OF THE MILITARY; AND (4) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF, OR PLAINTIFF'S REPRESENTATIVE, PROVING DAMAGES. PLAINTIFF TO NOTIFY ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AND THE TELEPHONE NUMBER TO CALL BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE AND PRESENT AN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO SUCH SERVICE AT THE DEFAULT HEARING. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. FAILURE OF DEFENDANT(S) TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN DEFAULT JUDGMENT BEING GRANTED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF. NOTICE ISSUED
- AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION ATTORNEY RYAN S. BUNDY 0090027 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
- MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
- SUMS COMPLAINT(56152418) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ADRIA FRESENKO 6343 JEFFERSON ROAD ASHTABULA, OH 44004 ANSWER DATE: 03/19/2025
- SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
- WRIT FEE
- REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE
- CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55909553 RETURNED 2/14/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT FRESENKO/ADRIA/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
- SUMS COMPLAINT(55909553) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ADRIA FRESENKO 6343 JEFFERSON ROAD ASHTABULA, OH 44004
- SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
- WRIT FEE
- JUDGE DEBORAH M TURNER ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
- LEGAL RESEARCH
- LEGAL NEWS
- LEGAL AID
- COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
- COMPUTER FEE
- CLERK'S FEE
- DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID RYAN S. BUNDY
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In