Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
- JUDGMENT ENTRY(58363149) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: GREGORY ZUCHOWSKI [email protected]
- JUDGMENT ENTRY(58363148) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SHAWN P MCCLURE [email protected]
- CONSENT JUDGMENT ENTRY. O.S.J. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
- STIPULATION FILED BY P1 DOLLAR BANK F S B ATTORNEY SHAWN P MCCLURE 0091794 CONSENT JUDGMENT ENTRY
- IN THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHE ASSERTED THAT A SETTLEMENT HAS BEEN REACHED. THE PARTIES ARE HEREBY GIVEN A LEAVE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 30, 2025, TO FILE A STIPULATED DISMISSAL ENTRY. IF SUCH AN AGREED ENTRY IS NOT FILED, THE COURT WILL DECIDE THE PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE BRIEFS OF RECORD. NOTICE ISSUED
- MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S BRIEF 10/20/2025 - UNKNOWN
- THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE DUE DATE FOR A BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. THE DEFENDANT'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION IS DUE BY SEPTEMBER 2, 2025. NOTICE ISSUED
- MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S BRIEF
- AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 DOLLAR BANK F S B ATTORNEY SHAWN P MCCLURE 0091794 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT
- MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTON FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10/20/2025 - UNKNOWN
- THIS CASE WAS CALLED FOR A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON APRIL 9, 2025, AS SCHEDULED. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. THE DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL DID NOT APPEAR BUT CONTACTED THE COURT BY PHONE. ANY PARTY DESIRING TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MUST DO SO NOT LATER THAN JULY 1, 2025. BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION AND REPLY ARE DUE ACCORDING TO CIVIL RULE 6(C)(1). NOTICE ISSUED
- GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 DOLLAR BANK F S B ATTORNEY SHAWN P MCCLURE 0091794 PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
- PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 04/09/2025 AT 09:30 AM. COURTROOM 18-D. CIVIL RULE 16(C) WILL BE FOLLOWED AND THE PARTIES MUST COMPLY WITH CIVIL RULE 26(F). NOTICE ISSUED
- ANSWER FILED BY D1 SPEROFF JENNIFER ATTORNEY GREGORY ZUCHOWSKI 0098449 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
- USPS RECEIPT NO. 56078861 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/14/2025 JENNIFER/SPEROFF/ PROCESSED BY COC 02/19/2025.
- SUMS COMPLAINT(56078861) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SPEROFF JENNIFER 2605 MONTCLAIR AVE CLEVELAND, OH 44109
- SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
- WRIT FEE
- JUDGE JOHN P O'DONNELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
- LEGAL RESEARCH
- LEGAL NEWS
- LEGAL AID
- COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
- COMPUTER FEE
- CLERK'S FEE
- DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID SHAWN P MCCLURE
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In