Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-10
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 35 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant Latasha Willis
Photo of Hon. TIMOTHY MCCORMICK

Judge

Hon. TIMOTHY MCCORMICK

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57225440) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: LATASHA WILLIS 12717 CHRISTINE AVE GARFIELD HEIGHTS, OH 44105
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57225439) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL S BERKOWITZ [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57225438) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL S BERKOWITZ [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57225437) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: PAUL K. RODE [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57225436) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: PAUL K. RODE [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57225435) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SUZANA PASTOR [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57225434) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SUZANA PASTOR [email protected]
  9. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57225433) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: HAL D. BURKE [email protected]
  10. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57225432) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: HAL D. BURKE [email protected]
  11. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57225431) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KEITH D WEINER [email protected]
  12. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57225430) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KEITH D WEINER [email protected]
  13. CASE CALLED FOR DEFAULT HEARING ON 06/03. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL; DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. THE COURT FINDS THAT PROPER SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND THAT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED UNDER CIV.R. 12. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. NOTICE FILED BY P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION ATTORNEY PAUL K. RODE 0080911 NOTICE OF FILING
  15. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION ATTORNEY PAUL K. RODE 0080911 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
  16. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION ATTORNEY PAUL K. RODE 0080911 DAMAGE AFFIDAVIT
  17. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 06/22/2025 - UNKNOWN
  18. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WAS SET FOR 5-1-25. DEFENDANT FAILED TO CALL INTO CMC. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 06/03/2025 AT 02:00 PM. DEFAULT HEARING TO BE HELD BY PHONE. PARTIES TO CALL INTO THE COURT AT 216-443-8605. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL MUST FILE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS BEFORE DEFAULT HEARING. FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE ANY OF THESE ITEMS SHALL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION: 1. THE CONTRACT(S), ASSIGNMENT(S), OR WRITTEN INSTRUMENT(S) UPON WHICH PLAINTIFF SEEKS JUDGMENT. 2. JUDGMENT ENTRY REFLECTING PRINCIPAL DUE WITHOUT REGARD TO ACCRUED INTEREST. 3. AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY AVERRING COMPLIANCE WITH ALL SERVICE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES AND RULES CONTAINING ATTACHMENT(S) THAT DEMONSTRATE PROOF OF SERVICE. 4. AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF(S) OR PLAINTIFFS' REPRESENTATIVE PROVING DAMAGES. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. SUMS COMPLAINT(56378205) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: LATASHA WILLIS 12717 CHRISTINE AVE GARFIELD HEIGHTS, OH 44105 ANSWER DATE: 04/11/2025
  20. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  21. WRIT FEE
  22. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 05/01/2025 AT 10:30 AM. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO INITIATE THE CALL WITH ALL PARTIES AND THEN CALL THE COURT AT 216-443-8745. NOTICE ISSUED
  23. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REISSUE SERVICE ORDINARY MAIL
  24. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56075770 RETURNED 3/6/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WILLIS/LATASHA/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  25. SUMS COMPLAINT(56075770) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: LATASHA WILLIS 12717 CHRISTINE AVE GARFIELD HEIGHTS, OH 44105
  26. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. WRIT FEE
  28. JUDGE TIMOTHY MCCORMICK ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  29. LEGAL RESEARCH
  30. LEGAL NEWS
  31. LEGAL AID
  32. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  33. COMPUTER FEE
  34. CLERK'S FEE
  35. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID MICHAEL S BERKOWITZ

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more