Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-06
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 42 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Credit Acceptance Corp. C/o Levy & Associates, Llc
Defendant Robin Harris
Photo of Hon. JOHN J RUSSO

Judge

Hon. JOHN J RUSSO

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. CASE REFUND TO LEVY & ASSOCIATES LLC.
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57306221) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ROBIN HARRIS 1247 E 87TH ST CLEVELAND, OH 44108
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57306220) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CRYSTAL M DUPLAY [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57306219) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ERIN C ENDERLE [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57306218) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: EDEN R SARVER [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57306217) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KIMBERLY A. KLEMENOK [email protected]
  8. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 06/03/2025, IS GRANTED. THIS MATTER COMES BEFORE THE COURT ON PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS AGAINST DEFENDANT ROBIN HARRIS.THE COURT FINDS THAT PROPER SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANT HAS BEEN OBTAINED VIA REGULAR MAIL, AND THAT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED UNDER CIV.R. 12. THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 55, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT THE PLAINTIFF CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP. RECOVER OF THE DEFENDANT, ROBIN HARRIS, A JUDGMENT IN THE SUM OF FOUR THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED TWENTY-SIX AND 99/100 DOLLARS ($4,826.99) PLUS INTEREST AT 8% PER ANNUM FROM THE JUDGMENT DATE, AND THE COURT COSTS OF THIS ACTION, FOR ALL OF WHICH EXECUTION MAY BE ISSUED AS PROVIDED BY LAW. THE PARTIES HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL THIS JUDGMENT. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP. ATTORNEY ERIN C ENDERLE 0081407 AFFIDAVIT AS TO MILITARY SERVICE
  10. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  11. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR HARRIS/ROBIN/ 05/15/2025 17:01:58
  12. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR DUPLAY/CRYSTAL/M 05/15/2025 17:01:58
  13. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR KLEMENOK/KIMBERLY/A. 05/15/2025 17:01:58
  14. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR SARVER/EDEN/R 05/15/2025 17:01:58
  15. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR ENDERLE/ERIN/C 05/15/2025 17:01:58
  16. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 06/10/2025 AT 10:00 AM. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES SHALL APPEAR BY PHONE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE APPEAR BY PHONE. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL CALL THE COURT S CONFERENCE NUMBER (605) 313-5579 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 4539808# AT THE SCHEDULED TIME. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS THE FACTS OF THE CASE, DISCOVERY PROGRESS, AND SCHEDULING MATTERS. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND INTERROGATORIES MUST BE SERVED PRIOR TO THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THE PARTIES MUST ALSO FILE THIS COURT'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BY THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THIS COURT'S TRIAL ORDER IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT JUDGE JOHN J. RUSSO'S WEBPAGE ON THE COURT'S WEBSITE AT: HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/JUDGES/JUDGE-JOHN-J-RUSSO/
  17. CMC IS CANCELLED AS DEFENDANT IS IN DEFAULT OF FILING AN ANSWER OR RESPONSIVE PLEADING. PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ON OR BEFORE 5/8/25 AND PROVIDE: (1) THE CONTRACT(S), ASSIGNMENT(S), ACCOUNT STATEMENT(S), OR WRITTEN INSTRUMENT(S) UPON WHICH PLAINTIFF SEEKS JUDGMENT; (2) AN AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT; (3) AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES; (4) A MILITARY AFFIDAVIT, IF APPLICABLE; AND (5) A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 05/15/2025 AT 10:15 AM IS CANCELLED. JUDGE: JOHN J RUSSO (345) REASON: DEF IN DEFAULT (notice sent).
  19. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR HARRIS/ROBIN/ 04/17/2025 17:01:49
  20. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR DUPLAY/CRYSTAL/M 04/17/2025 17:01:49
  21. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR KLEMENOK/KIMBERLY/A. 04/17/2025 17:01:49
  22. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR SARVER/EDEN/R 04/17/2025 17:01:49
  23. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR ENDERLE/ERIN/C 04/17/2025 17:01:49
  24. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 05/15/2025 AT 10:15 AM. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES SHALL APPEAR BY PHONE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE APPEAR BY PHONE. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL CALL THE COURT S CONFERENCE NUMBER (605) 313-5579 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 4539808# AT THE SCHEDULED TIME. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS THE FACTS OF THE CASE, DISCOVERY PROGRESS, AND SCHEDULING MATTERS. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND INTERROGATORIES MUST BE SERVED PRIOR TO THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THE PARTIES MUST ALSO FILE THIS COURT'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BY THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THIS COURT'S TRIAL ORDER IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT JUDGE JOHN J. RUSSO'S WEBPAGE ON THE COURT'S WEBSITE AT: HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/JUDGES/JUDGE-JOHN-J-RUSSO/
  25. SUMS COMPLAINT(56430380) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ROBIN HARRIS 1247 E 87TH ST CLEVELAND, OH 44108 ANSWER DATE: 04/17/2025
  26. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. WRIT FEE
  28. PRAECIPE FILED PRAECIPE
  29. THE DOCKET REFLECTS THAT DEFENDANT HAS ONLY ATTEMPTED SERVICE ONE TIME AND THAT SERVICE ATTEMPT WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL. PLAINTIFF TO RE-ATTEMPT SERVICE BY 3/24/25 OR THIS MATTER MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(B)(1). NOTICE ISSUED
  30. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56049978 RETURNED 2/27/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HARRIS/ROBIN/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  31. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E). "IF A SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT IS NOT MADE UPON A DEFENDANT WITHIN SIX MONTHS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT AND THE PARTY ON WHOSE BEHALF SUCH SERVICE WAS REQUIRED CANNOT SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY SUCH SERVICE WAS NOT MADE WITHIN THAT PERIOD. THE ACTION SHALL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE UPON THE COURT'S OWN INITIATIVE WITH NOTICE TO SUCH PARTY OR UPON MOTION." IF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT(S) IS NOT PERFECTED WITHIN 180 DAYS OF FILING OF THE COMPLAINT, THIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E). NOTICE ISSUED
  32. SUMS COMPLAINT(56049978) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ROBIN HARRIS 1247 E 87TH ST CLEVELAND, OH 44108
  33. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  34. WRIT FEE
  35. JUDGE JOHN J RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  36. LEGAL RESEARCH
  37. LEGAL NEWS
  38. LEGAL AID
  39. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  40. COMPUTER FEE
  41. CLERK'S FEE
  42. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID ERIN C ENDERLE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more