Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Vermont Unified

Court

Vermont Unified

Vermont

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-11-05
Status Disposed
Type Foreclosure
Docket 49 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Case Open
  2. Notice of Appeal Filed
  3. Transmittal Form
  4. Motion for Permission to Appeal Foreclosure Filed by: Appellant Burke, Stephen W.; Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan
  5. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Sheldon M. Katz, Timothy D. King, Jeffrey J. Hardiman, Evan Barquist
  6. Case Number Assignment Notice
  7. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan; Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellate Attorney King, Timothy D.; Trial Court Attorney Katz, Sheldon M.
  8. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Sheldon M. Katz, Timothy D. King, Jeffrey J. Hardiman, Evan Barquist
  9. Motion Response Objection to Defendant's Motion for Permission to File Discretionary Appeal Filed by: Appellee New Penn Financial LLC; Trial Court Attorney Katz, Sheldon M. Objection to Defendant's Motion for Permission to File Discretionary Appeal
  10. Final Decision Miscellaneous PLR/HEE/KRC/WDC Mandate: Dismissed
  11. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan; Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellate Attorney King, Timothy D.; Trial Court Attorney Katz, Sheldon M.
  12. Motion to Reconsider Motion to Reconsider Entry Order that the Appeal was Untimely Filed by: Appellant Burke, Stephen W.; Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan Motion to Reconsider Entry Order that the Appeal was Untimely
  13. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Sheldon M. Katz, Timothy D. King, Jeffrey J. Hardiman, Evan Barquist
  14. Entry Order (Judicial Officer: Carroll, Karen R.) Issued By: KRC Re: Motion to reconsider & remand to superior court
  15. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan; Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellate Attorney King, Timothy D.; Trial Court Attorney Katz, Sheldon M.
  16. Notice of Appeal Filed TC NOA Date: 01/14/2022
  17. Transmittal Form
  18. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Sheldon M. Katz, Timothy D. King, Jeffrey J. Hardiman, Evan Barquist
  19. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Sheldon M. Katz, Timothy D. King, Jeffrey J. Hardiman, Evan Barquist
  20. Entry Order Issued By: PLR/HEE/KRC/WDC Re: Reinstating appeal
  21. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan; Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellate Attorney King, Timothy D.; Trial Court Attorney Katz, Sheldon M.
  22. Progress Order Re: AADS & TO Due Date: 02/08/2022
  23. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan; Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellate Attorney King, Timothy D.; Trial Court Attorney Katz, Sheldon M.
  24. Transcript Order Filed by: Appellant Burke, Stephen W.; Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan
  25. Appellant's Docketing Statement Filed by: Appellant Burke, Stephen W.; Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan
  26. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Sheldon M. Katz, Timothy D. King, Jeffrey J. Hardiman, Evan Barquist
  27. Record Complete
  28. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan; Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellate Attorney King, Timothy D.; Trial Court Attorney Katz, Sheldon M.
  29. Appellant's Brief Word Count: 1335 Filed by: Appellant Burke, Stephen W.; Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan Word Count: 1335
  30. Appellee's Brief Word Count: 1,555 Filed by: Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellee New Penn Financial LLC Word Count: 1,555
  31. Supplemental Printed Case Filed by: Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellee New Penn Financial LLC
  32. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Sheldon M. Katz, Timothy D. King, Jeffrey J. Hardiman, Evan Barquist
  33. Oral Argument Letter
  34. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan; Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellate Attorney King, Timothy D.; Trial Court Attorney Katz, Sheldon M.
  35. Appellant's Reply Brief Word Count: 708. Filed by: Appellant Burke, Stephen W.; Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan Word Count: 708.
  36. Response to Oral Argument Letter Type Of Argument Requested: Oral Filed by: Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellee New Penn Financial LLC Type Of Argument Requested: Oral
  37. To Be Argued Requested by: Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellee New Penn Financial LLC
  38. Response to Oral Argument Letter Type Of Argument Requested: Oral Filed by: Appellant Burke, Stephen W.; Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan Type Of Argument Requested: Oral
  39. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Sheldon M. Katz, Timothy D. King, Jeffrey J. Hardiman, Evan Barquist
  40. Calendar Sent to Parties
  41. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan; Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellate Attorney King, Timothy D.; Trial Court Attorney Katz, Sheldon M.
  42. Hearing Held Argued By: Attys Barquist & Hardiman Panel: HEE/WDC/NJW
  43. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Sheldon M. Katz, Timothy D. King, Jeffrey J. Hardiman, Evan Barquist
  44. Final Decision Panel Order Panel: HEE/WDC/NJW Mandate: Affirmed
  45. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan; Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellate Attorney King, Timothy D.; Trial Court Attorney Katz, Sheldon M.
  46. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Sheldon M. Katz, Timothy D. King, Jeffrey J. Hardiman, Evan Barquist
  47. Case Closed
  48. Mandate Letter
  49. Notice to Parties Affirmed. Recipients: Appellate Attorney, Attorney Barquist, Evan; Appellate Attorney Hardiman, Jeffrey J.; Appellate Attorney King, Timothy D.; Trial Court Attorney Katz, Sheldon M. Affirmed.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more