Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-03
Type Ac Rent And Possession
Docket 21 entries
Disposition consent judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Katherine Estates|Genisio, Charles S
Defendant Proctor, Shari Lyn
Photo of Hon. Hensley Joseph L

Judge

Hon. Hensley Joseph L

Jasper County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  2. Notice of Entry of Judgment Mailed to Defendant. jr
  3. Judgment Entered Judgment by consent in favor of Plaintiff for $2,723.00.
  4. Judgment Entered Judgment by consent in favor of Plaintiff for $2,723.00.
  5. Consent Judgment
  6. Proposed Order Filed Proposed Judgment. Filing received. Forwarded to Judge for review. Filed By: CHARLES S GENISIO On Behalf Of: KATHERINE ESTATES
  7. Exhibit Filed Filed By: CHARLES S GENISIO On Behalf Of: KATHERINE ESTATES
  8. Notice Plaintiff to prepare and submit formal judgment to Court within 10 days or case will be set for dismissal docket.
  9. Hearing Held Plaintiff appears by Attorney Charles Genisio and Defendant appears in person. Defendant consents to judgment. Judgment for Plaintiff pursuant to formal judgment. Associated Entries: 10/23/2024 - Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 10/28/2024; 9:00 AM; JOSEPH LEE HENSLEY; Jasper County - Joplin
  10. Sound Recording Log Sheet
  11. Notice of Court Hearing Sent Mailed to Defendant. jr
  12. Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 11/04/2024 - Hearing Held + Scheduled For: 10/28/2024; 9:00 AM; JOSEPH LEE HENSLEY; Jasper County - Joplin
  13. Hearing Held Plaintiff appears by Attorney, Charles Genisio. Defendant appears in person. Parties agree to continue to October 28, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. Associated Entries: 10/04/2024 - Court Trial Scheduled Scheduled For: 10/21/2024; 9:00 AM; JOSEPH LEE HENSLEY; Jasper County - Joplin
  14. Summons Posted Document ID - 24-SMLT-699; Served To - PROCTOR, SHARI LYN; Server - ; Served Date - 08-OCT-24; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Special Process Server; Reason Description - Posted; Service Text - Summons posted
  15. Summ Req-Assc Pers Serv Summons Return Posted. Filed By: CHARLES S GENISIO On Behalf Of: KATHERINE ESTATES
  16. Summons Issued-Landlord/Tenant Document ID: 24-SMLT-699, for PROCTOR, SHARI LYN Issued to attorney for service upon Defendant.
  17. Order - Special Process Server
  18. Court Trial Scheduled Associated Entries: 10/21/2024 - Hearing Held + Scheduled For: 10/21/2024; 9:00 AM; JOSEPH LEE HENSLEY; Jasper County - Joplin
  19. Filing Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: CHARLES S GENISIO
  20. Proposed Order Filed Proposed Order for Special Process Server. Filed By: CHARLES S GENISIO On Behalf Of: KATHERINE ESTATES
  21. Motion Special Process Server Motion for Special Process Server. Filed By: CHARLES S GENISIO On Behalf Of: KATHERINE ESTATES

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more