Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-22
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 58 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Th Msr Holdings Llc Fka Matrix Financial Services Corporation
Defendant Philena A. Seldon|Unknown Spouse, If Any, Of Philena A. Seldon|Century Federal Credit Union|King James South Aynsley Court Condominium Unit Owners Association, In|State Of Ohio, Department Of Taxation
Photo of Hon. Andrew J Santoli

Judge

Hon. Andrew J Santoli

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. COURT COST ASSESSED TH MSR HOLDINGS LLC FKA MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION BILLED C/O ATTY BILL AMOUNT 283.93 PAID AMOUNT 275 AMOUNT DUE 8.93
  3. COURT COST ASSESSED TH MSR HOLDINGS LLC FKA MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION BILL AMOUNT 283.93 PAID AMOUNT 275 AMOUNT DUE 8.93
  4. THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT THE PLAINTIFF'S COSTS. FINAL. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). NOTICE ISSUED
  5. NOTICE FILED BY P1 TH MSR HOLDINGS LLC FKA MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION ATTORNEY DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG 0079200 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
  6. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55920971 RETURNED 02/13/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SELDON/PHILENA/A. - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  7. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55920974 RETURNED 02/13/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF PHILENA A. SELDON - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  8. ANSWER FILED BY D5 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION ATTORNEY LAURA L. PETERS 0063425 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
  9. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55920974 RETURNED 2/13/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF PHILENA A. SELDON - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  10. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55920973 RETURNED 2/13/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF PHILENA A. SELDON - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  11. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55920971 RETURNED 2/13/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SELDON/PHILENA/A. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  12. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55920970 RETURNED 2/13/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SELDON/PHILENA/A. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  13. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55920975 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/03/2025 CENTURY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PROCESSED BY COC 02/12/2025.
  14. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55920977 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/31/2025 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 02/05/2025.
  15. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55920976 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/30/2025 KING JAMES SOUTH AYNSLEY COURT CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, IN PROCESSED BY COC 02/05/2025.
  16. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55920972 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/29/2025 UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF PHILENA A. SELDON PROCESSED BY COC 02/05/2025.
  17. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55920969 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/29/2025 SELDON/PHILENA/A. PROCESSED BY COC 02/05/2025.
  18. PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 4(E) AND THE COURT'S STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE, PLAINTIFF MUST PERFECT SERVICE ON ITS COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 07/16/2025 OR SHOW CAUSE WHY IT HAS FAILED TO DO SO. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. ANSWER FILED BY D4 KING JAMES SOUTH AYNSLEY COURT CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, IN ATTORNEY JILLIAN HENZLER 0089048 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT KING JAMES SOUTH AYNSLEY COURT CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
  20. SUMS COMPLAINT(55920977) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL 150 EAST GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  21. SUMS COMPLAINT(55920976) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: KING JAMES SOUTH AYNSLEY COURT CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, IN C/O K&C SERVICE CORP. 50 PUBLIC SQUARE, SUITE 2000 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  22. SUMS COMPLAINT(55920975) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CENTURY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 1240 EAST NINTH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44199
  23. SUMS COMPLAINT(55920974) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF PHILENA A. SELDON 2400 ORANGE AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44101-0000
  24. SUMS COMPLAINT(55920973) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF PHILENA A. SELDON P.O. BOX 6214 CLEVELAND, OH 44101-0000
  25. SUMS COMPLAINT(55920972) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF PHILENA A. SELDON 1931 KING JAMES PARKWAY WESTLAKE, OH 44145
  26. SUMS COMPLAINT(55920971) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: PHILENA A. SELDON 2400 ORANGE AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44101-0000
  27. SUMS COMPLAINT(55920970) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: PHILENA A. SELDON P.O. BOX 6214 CLEVELAND, OH 44101-0000
  28. SUMS COMPLAINT(55920969) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: PHILENA A. SELDON 1931 KING JAMES PARKWAY WESTLAKE, OH 44145
  29. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  30. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  31. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  32. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  33. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  34. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  35. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  36. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  37. WRIT FEE
  38. WRIT FEE
  39. WRIT FEE
  40. WRIT FEE
  41. WRIT FEE
  42. WRIT FEE
  43. WRIT FEE
  44. WRIT FEE
  45. WRIT FEE
  46. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  47. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  48. MAGISTRATE PAUL LUCAS ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  49. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  50. JUDGE ANDREW J. SANTOLI ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  51. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  52. LEGAL RESEARCH
  53. LEGAL NEWS
  54. LEGAL AID
  55. COMPUTER FEE
  56. CLERK'S FEE
  57. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG
  58. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more