Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Hartford County

Court

Hartford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-30
Type M 50 Misc Declaratory Judgment
Docket 77 entries

Parties

Plaintiff The Connecticut Light & Power Company D/b/a Eversource Energy|Yankee Gas Services Company D/b/a Eversource Energy|Aquarion Water Company Of Connecticut|Uil Holdings Corporation
Defendant State Of Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority|Marissa Paslick Gillett, Chairman, State Of Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority|John W. Betkoski, Utilities Commissioner, State Of Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority|Removed|Michael Caron, Utilities Commissioner, State Of Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority|David Arconti, Utilities Commissioner, State Of Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority

Docket Entries

  1. REQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  2. APPEARANCE Appearance
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. SUMMONS
  5. COMPLAINT
  6. RETURN OF SERVICE
  7. CONTINUATION OF PARTIES
  8. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES DIRECTED TO ALL DEFENDANTS
  9. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SERVICE OF FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION DIRECTED TO ALL DEFENDANTS
  10. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION DIRECTED TO ALL DEFENDANTS
  11. MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint [DOC #100.31] RESULT: Order 10/3/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  12. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/13/2025 HON LISA MORGAN
  13. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/3/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  14. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss [DKT #104.00]
  15. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PB 13-5 Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order to Stay All Discovery RESULT: Order 10/3/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  16. ORDER RESULT: Off 4/14/2025 HON KAITLIN HALLORAN
  17. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/3/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  18. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion for Protective Order [DKT #106.00]
  19. MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE - PB SEC 13-14 (FAIL APPEAR DEP) RESULT: Order 10/3/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  20. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/3/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  21. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE
  22. REQUEST FOR ARGUMENT - NON-ARG MATTER (JD-CV-128)
  23. REQUEST FOR ARGUMENT - NON-ARG MATTER (JD-CV-128)
  24. OBJECTION TO MOTION PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
  25. AFFIDAVIT AFFIDAVIT OF THOMAS J. MURPHY, ESQ.
  26. REPLY MEMORANDUM Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss [DKT #104] and Exhibits
  27. REPLY MEMORANDUM Reply Brief in Support of Mot. for Prot. Order (#106) and in Opp to Mot. for Order of Compl (#108)
  28. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Defendants' Nonconsented To Request for Continuance of Hearing Scheduled for June 9 re Mot. for PO RESULT: Granted 5/29/2025 HON KAITLIN HALLORAN
  29. ORDER RESULT: Granted 5/29/2025 HON KAITLIN HALLORAN
  30. REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE
  31. ORDER RESULT: Order 7/7/2025 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  32. ORDER SEE FILE Case Management Order RESULT: Order 7/8/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  33. REPORT JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT
  34. NOTICE PLAINTIFFS' OFFER OF PROOF
  35. EXHIBITS
  36. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION Memorandum of Decision on Motion to Dismiss No 104 RESULT: Order 10/3/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  37. JUDGMENT IN PART OF DISMISSAL CASE REMAINS PENDING
  38. MOTION TO REARGUE/RECONSIDER
  39. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/3/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  40. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PB 13-5 RESULT: Order 10/22/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  41. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/22/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  42. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  43. REPLY Reply Brief in Further Support of Motion for Protective Order
  44. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  45. EXHIBITS Exhibit in Support of Objection to Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. 126.00)
  46. WITHDRAWAL IN PART
  47. OBJECTION TO MOTION Plaintiffs' Objection to Motion for Re-argument
  48. REPLY Defendant's Reply Brief in Further Support of Motion for Re-Argument
  49. ORDER Transcript of Order from November 3, 2025 hearing
  50. MOTION FOR ORDER PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SET SCHEDULE TO AMEND
  51. ORDER RESULT: Off 11/13/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  52. EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SET SCHEDULE TO AMEND
  53. OBJECTION Defendant's Objection to Motion to Set Schedule
  54. MOTION FOR STAY Defendant's Motion to Stay Depositions
  55. ORDER RESULT: Off 11/13/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  56. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant's Motion for Protective order Limiting the Scope of Depositions
  57. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/13/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  58. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  59. OBJECTION TO MOTION PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTION TO MOTIONS FOR STAY AND FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
  60. REPLY Defendant's Reply Brief in Further Support of Motion for Protective Order
  61. SCHEDULING ORDER PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Order 11/21/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  62. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/21/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  63. NOTICE Defendant Michael Caron's Notice of Filing Responses to Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions
  64. NOTICE Defendant David Arconti's Notice of Filing Responses to Plaintiff's Request for Admissions
  65. REQUEST TO REVISE
  66. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 PURA's Consented To Motion for Extension of Time to File Responses to First Set of Int and Doc Prod
  67. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Granted 12/31/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  68. ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/31/2025 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  69. REQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  70. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION ON CONSENT TO EXTEND DISCOVERY RESPONSE AND TIME TO AMEND RESULT: Granted 1/8/2026 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  71. ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/8/2026 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  72. REQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  73. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Granted 2/3/2026 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  74. ORDER RESULT: Granted 2/3/2026 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  75. REQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  76. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PLAINTIFFS' MOTION ON CONSENT TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES RESULT: Order 3/3/2026 HON ELIZABETH STEWART
  77. ORDER RESULT: Order 3/3/2026 HON ELIZABETH STEWART

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more