Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-11-19
Status Closed
Type Civil Superior Ct (3 Di)|Other Superior Court Complaint
Docket 61 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Doe, John
Defendant City Of Dillingham
Photo of Hon. Reigh, Christina L

Judge

Hon. Reigh, Christina L

Aleutians East Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PROOF OF SERVICE
  2. Superior Court Complaint Receipt: 2242720 Date: 11/19/2024
  3. Summons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
  4. Attorney Information
  5. Motion to proceed under a Pseudonym Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) Michael Rogers (Plaintiff); ; David A Case (Attorney) on behalf of Michael Rogers (Plaintiff) Filing Party: Rogers, Michael Case Motion #1
  6. Order Granting Motion Doe, John Case Motion #1 Motion to proceed under a Pseudonym
  7. Civil Rule 4(f) Affidavit
  8. Answer Attorney: Fechter, John (1111095) Attorney: Palmer, Robert Harding (1405032) City Of Dillingham (Defendant);
  9. Defendant's motion to file documents under seal Attorney: Fechter, John (1111095) Attorney: Palmer, Robert Harding (1405032) Filing Party: City Of Dillingham Case Motion #2
  10. Attorney Information Attorney Fechter, John representing Defendant City Of Dillingham as of 12/09/2024
  11. Attorney Information Attorney Palmer, Robert Harding representing Defendant City Of Dillingham as of 12/09/2024
  12. Response to Motion (Opposition) Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) Case Motion #2: Defendant's motion to file documents under seal
  13. Non-Opposed motion for a protective order Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) Filing Party: Doe, John Case Motion #3
  14. Notice of taking depositions Attorney: Case, David A (0902002)
  15. Order Granting Motion Doe, John Case Motion #3 Non-Opposed motion for a protective order
  16. Order Granting Motion City Of Dillingham Case Motion #2 Defendant's motion to file documents under seal
  17. Report of Parties' Planning Meeting
  18. Confidential/Sealed Documents Description:
  19. Defandant's records filed under seal Attorney: Fechter, John (1111095)
  20. Defendant's affidavit of documents filed under seal- Affidavit Tracy O'Malley Chief of Police
  21. Motion for Summary Judgment - Civil Rule 77(c)(ii) Attorney: Fechter, John (1111095) Filing Party: Doe, John Case Motion #4
  22. Affidavit of Abigail Flynn Case Motion #4: Motion for Summary Judgment - Civil Rule 77(c)(ii)
  23. Non-Opposition to: Order Enlarging time to file opposition to motion for summary judgment and crossmotion for summary judgment Case Motion #4: Motion for Summary Judgment - Civil Rule 77(c)(ii)
  24. Non-Opposed motion to order enarging time to file opposition to motion for summary judgment and cross-motionn for summary judgment Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) Filing Party: Doe, John Case Motion #6
  25. Order Granting Motion Doe, John Case Motion #6 Non-Opposed motion to order enarging time to file opposition to motion for summary judgment and cross-motionn for summary judgment
  26. Uncategorized Motion or Request Non-Opposed Motion to Allow Confidential Filing Of Unredacted Exibits to Opposition to Motion For summary Judgment Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) John Doe (Plaintiff); ; David A Case (Attorney) on behalf of John Doe (Plaintiff) Filing Party: Doe, John Case Motion #5
  27. Proposed Order (Linked to Motion) Case Motion #5: Uncategorized Motion or Request Non-Opposed Motion to Allow Confidential Filing Of Unredacted Exibits to Opposition to Motion For summary Judgment
  28. Opposition to city's motion for summary judgment and plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) Case Motion #4: Motion for Summary Judgment - Civil Rule 77(c)(ii)
  29. Opposition to city's motion for summary judgment and plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) Filing Party: Doe, John Case Motion #7
  30. Reply (linked to motion) Attorney: Fechter, John (1111095) City Of Dillingham (Defendant); ; John Fechter (Attorney) on behalf of City Of Dillingham (Defendant) Case Motion #4: Motion for Summary Judgment - Civil Rule 77(c)(ii)
  31. Opposition to Motion (linked to motion) Attorney: Fechter, John (1111095) City Of Dillingham (Defendant); ; John Fechter (Attorney) on behalf of City Of Dillingham (Defendant) Case Motion #7: Opposition to city's motion for summary judgment and plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment
  32. No-Opposed motion to file unredacted exhibit D to reply to opposition to cross-motion for summary judgment as confidential Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) Filing Party: Doe, John Case Motion #8
  33. John Doe's reply to defendants opposition to doe's cross motion for summary Judgment Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) Case Motion #7: Opposition to city's motion for summary judgment and plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment
  34. Order Granting Motion Doe, John Case Motion #8 No-Opposed motion to file unredacted exhibit D to reply to opposition to cross-motion for summary judgment as confidential
  35. Request for Oral Argument Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) Filing Party: Doe, John Case Motion #9
  36. Order Granting Motion Doe, John Case Motion #5 Uncategorized Motion or Request Non-Opposed Motion to Allow Confidential Filing Of Unredacted Exibits to Opposition to Motion For summary Judgment
  37. Order Granting Motion on Record Doe, John Case Motion #9 Request for Oral Argument
  38. Notice of Non=-Documentary exhibit ot attachment 3xhibit D-Affidavit of Trevor Walters(confidential)
  39. Supplemental to documents filed under seal Attorney: Fechter, John (1111095) Attorney: Palmer, Robert Harding (1405032)
  40. Order Denying Motion Doe, John Case Motion #4 Motion for Summary Judgment - Civil Rule 77(c)(ii)
  41. Order Granting Motion Doe, John Case Motion #7 Opposition to city's motion for summary judgment and plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment
  42. Motion for Reconsideration in Part Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) Filing Party: Doe, John Case Motion #10
  43. Order Allowing Response to Motion for Reconsideration. Response Due: 4/18/25 Case Motion #10: Motion for Reconsideration in Part
  44. Defendant's response to motion for reconsideration Attorney: Fechter, John (1111095) Attorney: Palmer, Robert Harding (1405032) Case Motion #10: Motion for Reconsideration in Part
  45. Order Denying Motion Doe, John Case Motion #10 Motion for Reconsideration in Part
  46. Propossed Final Judgment and Injuction John Doe (Plaintiff); ; David A Case (Attorney) on behalf of John Doe (Plaintiff)
  47. Defendants objection to Plaintiffs Proposed Final Judgment Attorney: Fechter, John (1111095)
  48. Response to the Defendant's Objection to Plaintiff's Proposed Final Judgement Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) David A Case (Attorney) on behalf of John Doe (Plaintiff)
  49. Final Judgment
  50. Cost Bill Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) John Doe (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Doe, John Case Motion #11
  51. Motion for Attorney Fees Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) Filing Party: Doe, John Case Motion #12
  52. Opposition to Motion (linked to motion) Attorney: Fechter, John (1111095) Case Motion #12: Motion for Attorney Fees
  53. Reply (linked to motion) Reply to Opposition to Motion for Attorney's Fees Attorney: Case, David A (0902002) David A Case (Attorney) on behalf of John Doe (Plaintiff) Case Motion #12: Motion for Attorney Fees
  54. Notice of Filing Proposed Order Miscellaneous (linked to motion) Attorney: Fechter, John (1111095) City Of Dillingham (Defendant);
  55. Order Granting Motion in Part Doe, John Case Motion #12 Motion for Attorney Fees
  56. Proposed Order, Judgment, Findings or Decree Proposed judgment for fees and costs
  57. PROOF OF SERVICE
  58. Order Granting Motion Doe, John Case Motion #11 Cost Bill
  59. Summary Judgment for Plaintiff Granted
  60. Judgment Entered Summary Judgment Amount: 0.00 Pre-Summary Judgment Interest: 0.00 Attorney Fees: 884.10 Court Costs: 0.00 Other Fees: 0.00 Summary Judgment Total: 884.10 Total Accrued Costs: 0.00 Total Accrued Interest: 0.00 Terms: only attorney fees Type: Summary Judgment Judge: Reigh, Christina L Summary Judgment Date: 07/23/2025 Summary Judgment Time: 12:00PM Referee: Recommendation Date: Summary Judgment Status: Judgment Entered Summary Judgment For: Doe, John - Plaintiff Summary Judgment Against: City Of Dillingham - Defendant ------------------------------------------- Issuance ------------------------------------------- Writ Type: Date Issued: Accrued Interest: Satisfied Amount: ------------------------------------------- Return ------------------------------------------- Processed By: Received From: Accrued Costs: Satisfied Amount: Date Returned: Date Collected: Date Paid: Summary Judgment Satisfied Amount: 0.00 Summary Judgment Balance: 884.10 Case Total: 0.00 Case Satisfied Amount: 0.00 Case Balance: 0.00
  61. Satisfaction of Judgment satisfaction of judgment

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more