Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-07
Status INACTIVE
Type Tort M.v. Accident
Docket 39 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Natalie Baughman
Defendant Steven Suchy
Photo of Hon. Deborah M Turner

Judge

Hon. Deborah M Turner

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58095061) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: HENRY W CHAMBERLAIN [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58095060) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: HENRY W CHAMBERLAIN [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58095059) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JAMES J IMBRIGIOTTA [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58095058) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JAMES J IMBRIGIOTTA [email protected]
  6. DISMISSAL ENTRY. OSJ. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. STIPULATION FILED BY D1 STEVEN SUCHY ATTORNEY JAMES J IMBRIGIOTTA 0040317 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
  8. MEDIATION HEARING HELD. THE PARTIES IN THE CAPTIONED CASE HAVE REACHED A SETTLEMENT AND AGREE TO SUBMIT THE DISMISSAL ENTRY WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. MOTION TO COMPEL W EXHIBITS, FILED 06/25/2025, WITHDRAWN BY DEFENDANT BY NOTICE FILED 07/17/2025. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. NOTICE FILED BY D1 STEVEN SUCHY ATTORNEY JAMES J IMBRIGIOTTA 0040317 NOTICE WD MTN COMPEL
  11. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL, FILED 07/07/2025, IS GRANTED. RESPONSE TO MOTION TO COMPEL DUE 07/23/2025. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL
  13. MOTION FILED FOR D1 STEVEN SUCHY JAMES J IMBRIGIOTTA 0040317 MOTION TO COMPEL W EXHIBITS
  14. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF P1 NATALIE BAUGHMAN FILED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF KATHY SUCHY
  15. MEDIATION SET FOR 08/18/2025 AT 03:00 PM. (Notice Sent).
  16. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF P1 NATALIE BAUGHMAN FILED AMENDED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF STEVEN SUCHY
  17. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF P1 NATALIE BAUGHMAN FILED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF STEVEN SUCHY
  18. NOTICE FILED BY D1 STEVEN SUCHY ATTORNEY JAMES J IMBRIGIOTTA 0040317 NOTICE OF SERVICE - DISCOVERY
  19. MOTION TO BIFURCATE & STAY DISCOVERY, FILED 02/28/2025, IS GRANTED AND DENIED IN PART. THE TRIAL ON THE PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM SHALL COMMENCE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE TRIAL ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR COMPENSATORY DAMAGES WITH THE SAME JURY. DISCOVERY SHALL NOT BE BIFURCATED. NOTICE ISSUED
  20. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY PHONE HELD 02/18/2025. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL HENRY CHAMBERLAIN. DEFENDANT APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL JAMES IMBRIGIOTTA. THE PARTIES AGREED TO THE FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE: DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 06/13/2025 PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 09/15/2025 DEFENDANT'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 10/15/2025 THE PARTIES ARE ENCOURAGED TO WORK TOGETHER FOR DISCOVERY DISPUTES. IF DISCOVERY DISPUTES REMAIN, THE PARTIES ARE TO CONTACT THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT (216) 443-8577 BEFORE FILING ANY MOTIONS TO COMPEL AND A HEARING MAY BE SCHEDULED. CAPTIONED CASE IS HEREBY REFERRED TO MEDIATION WITH THE COURT MEDIATOR. MEDIATION TO COMMENCE AFTER 06/16/2025 AND BE CONCLUDED BY 08/15/2025. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 11/12/2025 AT 02:00 PM. PARTIES TO SERVE AND FILE PRETRIAL STATEMENT NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE FINAL PRETRIAL. ALL PARTIES AND CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVES MUST BE PRESENT AT THE FINAL PRETRIAL WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY. IF THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST IS AN INSURANCE COMPANY, CORPORATION, COMMON CARRIER, OR OTHER ARTIFICIAL ENTITY, THEN THE CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE THE PERSON WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE AND ENTER INTO A BINDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS TO ALL CLAIMS. FAILURE TO APPEAR BY ANY PARTY/REPRESENTATIVE WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY SHALL CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER AND MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, AN AWARD OF COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES INCURRED BY THE OTHER PARTIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONFERENCE, AS WELL AS OTHER APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS AGAINST THE NONCOMPLYING PARTY AND/OR COUNSEL. IN ADDITION, THE COURT WILL SCHEDULE A HEARING WHICH SAID PARTY/REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ATTEND PERSONALLY AND SHOW CAUSE WHY S/HE SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT. TRIAL BY JURY SET FOR 01/14/2026 AT 09:00 AM. PARTIES SHALL SUBMIT TRIAL BRIEFS, MOTIONS IN LIMINE, JURY INTERROGATORIES AND JURY INSTRUCTIONS, NO LATER THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. FAILURE TO SUBMIT A JURY INSTRUCTION ON AN ISSUE MAY RESULT IN WAIVER OF THE INSTRUCTION. TRIAL BRIEFS ARE TO INCLUDE: A STATEMENT OF THE FACTS; A DISCUSSION OF THE CONTROLLING LAW; ANY STIPULATIONS; WITNESS LIST ALONG WITH A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE TESTIMONY OF EACH WITNESS; EXHIBIT LIST CONTAINING A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EACH EXHIBIT. EACH PARTY SHALL INCLUDE THE CURRICULUM VITAE OF ANY EXPERT THAT MAY BE CALLED TO TESTIFY AT TRIAL. WITNESSES OR EXHIBITS NOT LISTED IN THE TRIAL BRIEF SHALL NOT TESTIFY OR BE INTRODUCED AT TRIAL ABSENT A SHOWING OF GOOD CAUSE. OPPOSING BRIEFS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO CONFER WITH ONE ANOTHER WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED JURY INTERROGATORIES/INSTRUCTIONS, WITH A VIEW TO REACHING AGREEMENT ON INTERROGATORIES/INSTRUCTIONS TO BE REQUESTED. THE INTERROGATORIES/INSTRUCTIONS AGREED UPON BY ALL COUNSEL SHALL BE IDENTIFIED. DISPUTED INTERROGATORIES/INSTRUCTIONS SHALL LIKEWISE BE IDENTIFIED ALONG WITH SEPARATE CITATION TO LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR EACH. COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT A COPY OF THE PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS, INTERROGATORIES AND VERDICT FORMS ARE EMAILED IN WORD FORMAT TO THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT [email protected] AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14) DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED TRIAL DATE. FAILURE OF A PARTY TO PROVIDE A PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION FOR AN ISSUE UPON WHICH THEY BEAR THE BURDEN OF PROOF AT TRIAL MAY RESULT IN WAIVER OF THAT ISSUE AT TRIAL. IF TESTIMONY IS TO BE PRESENTED BY PREVIOUSLY VIDEOTAPED TESTIMONY, ANY PARTY PRESENTING OBJECTIONS MUST PRESENT A TRANSCRIPT OF THE TESTIMONY AND A LOG OF OBJECTIONS AT LEAST (14) DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL UNLESS GOOD CAUSE IS SHOWN. THE OBJECTION LOG SHOULD STATE THE SUBSTANCE OF THE OBJECTION AND ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT. RESPONSES TO THE OBJECTION LOG ARE DUE (7) DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. EXHIBITS SHALL BE BOUND AND MARKED BEFORE TRIAL AND SUBMITTED TO THE COURT PRIOR TO TRIAL. ALL POSSIBLE STIPULATIONS ARE TO BE MADE PRIOR TO TRIAL. PARTIES SHALL PREPARE A STIPULATED STATEMENT OF THE CASE FOR THE COURT TO READ TO THE JURY PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 47(A). A PRE-TRIAL MOTION HEARING MAY BE SCHEDULED BY THE COURT. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS OR DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  21. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY P1 NATALIE BAUGHMAN HENRY W CHAMBERLAIN 0046682 PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO BIFURCATE CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND STAY DISCOVERY
  22. MOTION FILED FOR D1 STEVEN SUCHY JAMES J IMBRIGIOTTA 0040317 MOTION TO BIFURCATE & STAY DISCOVERY
  23. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 03/10/2025 AT 02:00 PM. MOVED FROM 11:00 AT REQUEST OF THE PARTIES. NOTICE ISSUED
  24. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 03/10/2025 AT 11:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  25. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 03/10/2025 AT 11:00 AM. PLAINTIFF TO INITIATE CALL WITH ALL PARTIES AND THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT (216) 443-8577. ANY ATTORNEY OR UNREPRESENTED PARTY WHO IS NOT AVAILABLE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED HIS/HER PARTICIPATION AND TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE CASE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF EACH PARTY TO ENSURE THE CLERK OF COURT'S OFFICE LISTS A CORRECT PHONE NUMBER FOR THAT PARTY. PARTIES SHOULD NOT WAIT FOR THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE BEGINNING TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY. NOTICE ISSUED
  26. NOTICE FILED BY D1 STEVEN SUCHY ATTORNEY JAMES J IMBRIGIOTTA 0040317 NOTICE OF SERVICE
  27. ANSWER FILED BY D1 STEVEN SUCHY ATTORNEY JAMES J IMBRIGIOTTA 0040317 ANSWER
  28. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55765669 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/10/2025 SUCHY/STEVEN/ PROCESSED BY COC 01/15/2025.
  29. SUMS COMPLAINT(55765669) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STEVEN SUCHY 3858 HAROLD DRIVE RICHFIELD, OH 44286
  30. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  31. WRIT FEE
  32. JUDGE DEBORAH M TURNER ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  33. LEGAL RESEARCH
  34. LEGAL NEWS
  35. LEGAL AID
  36. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  37. COMPUTER FEE
  38. CLERK'S FEE
  39. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID HENRY W CHAMBERLAIN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more