Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-24
Status INACTIVE
Type Tort M.v. Accident
Docket 62 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Arthur Bennett Sr
Defendant Jazzmin Parker|Progressive Insurance Company
Photo of Hon. Richard a Bell

Judge

Hon. Richard a Bell

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58762980) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY 6300 WILSON MILLS RD. MAYFIELD VILLAGE, OH 44143
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58762979) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ALLISON E. HAYES [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58762978) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ALLISON E. HAYES [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58762977) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD MCGRAW [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58762976) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ALEXANDER B REICH [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58762975) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DANIEL SCOTT KALISH [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58762974) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DANIEL SCOTT KALISH [email protected]
  9. PURSUANT TO PARTIES' STIPULATED DISMISSAL ENTRY, FILED 11/19/2025, CASE IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AT DEFENDANT JAZZMIN PARKER'S COST. COURT RETAINS JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES. COURT COSTS ASSESSED AS DIRECTED. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. STIPULATION FILED BY D1 JAZZMIN PARKER ATTORNEY ALLISON E. HAYES 0087056 STIPULATED DISMISSAL ENTRY
  11. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58715455) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY 6300 WILSON MILLS RD. MAYFIELD VILLAGE, OH 44143
  12. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58715454) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD MCGRAW [email protected]
  13. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58715453) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ALLISON E. HAYES [email protected]
  14. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58715452) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ALLISON E. HAYES [email protected]
  15. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58715451) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ALEXANDER B REICH [email protected]
  16. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58715450) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DANIEL SCOTT KALISH [email protected]
  17. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58715449) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DANIEL SCOTT KALISH [email protected]
  18. PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER, DATED 11/04/2025, CASE IS REMOVED FROM THE COURT'S ACTIVE DOCKET. COURT COSTS ASSESSED AS DIRECTED. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER, DATED 10/30/2025, PARTIES HAVE RESOLVED ALL CLAIMS. ON OR BEFORE 12/01/2025, PARTIES' SHALL FILE A DISMISSAL ENTRY. FAILURE TO FILE A DISMISSAL ENTRY BY THE DEADLINE, OR OBTAIN AN EXTENSION TO THE DISMISSAL ENTRY DEADLINE VIA MOTION WITH THE COURT, SHALL RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH COSTS ASSIGNED TO PLAINTIFF(S). ALL FUTURE DATES ARE CANCELLED AND PENDING MOTIONS, IF ANY, ARE RENDERED MOOT. NOTICE ISSUED
  20. UPON THE PARTIES' NOTICE TO THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION DEPARTMENT, THE MATTER HAS BEEN SETTLED. THE PARTIES ARE TO SUBMIT THEIR OWN AGREED ENTRY WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  21. MEDIATION SCHEDULED FOR 10/29/2025 AT 10:30 AM IS CANCELLED.
  22. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF COURT DATES, FILED 10/02/2025, IS WITHDRAWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  23. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 10/22/2025 AT 10:30 AM IS CANCELLED.
  24. NOTICE FILED BY D1 JAZZMIN PARKER ATTORNEY ALLISON E. HAYES 0087056 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF COURT DATES
  25. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SET FOR 10/22/2025 AT 10:30 AM. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IS TO INITIATE THE TELEPHONE CALL TO DEFENSE COUNSEL AND THEN CONFERENCE IN THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY AT (216) 443-8581. COUNSEL MAY ALSO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO FACILITATE A CONFERENCE CALL. NOTICE ISSUED
  26. MOTION FILED FOR D1 JAZZMIN PARKER ALLISON E. HAYES 0087056 MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF COURT DATES
  27. MEDIATION SET FOR 10/29/2025 AT 10:30 AM. (Notice Sent).
  28. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE, FILED 06/25/2025, IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. CV-25-111244 IS CONSOLIDATED INTO CV-25-110872. PARTIES IN CASE NO. CV-25-111244 AT TO FOLLOW THE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER, DATED 06/10/2025, IN CASE NO. CV-25-110872. NOTICE ISSUED
  29. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE FILED PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
  30. CMC BY PHONE HELD ON 06/09/2025. ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATED THROUGH COUNSEL. THE COURT SETS THE FOLLOWING LITIGATION SCHEDULE: FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF 10/10/2025. PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 10/10/2025. CAPTIONED CASE IS HEREBY REFERRED TO MEDIATION WITH THE COURT MEDIATOR. PARTIES TO MEDIATE ON OR BEFORE 11/14/2025. DEFENDANT'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 12/05/2025. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 01/21/2026 AT 01:00 PM. COUNSEL OF RECORD MUST BE PRESENT. IF THERE IS MORE THAN THE ONE COUNSEL OF RECORD, THE LEAD ATTORNEY MUST BE PRESENT. AT LEAST ONE WEEK BEFORE THE FINAL PRETRIAL, PARTIES SHALL EXCHANGE DEMANDS AND OFFERS. IN ADDITION TO COUNSEL OF RECORD, PARTIES MUST APPEAR IN-PERSON. ALL INDIVIDUALS WITH FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY MUST BE PRESENT AT THE FINAL PRETRIAL. FOR DEFENDING PARTIES WITH INSURANCE, AN INSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE WITH FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY MUST APPEAR IN-PERSON. THE INSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE MUST HAVE AUTHORITY UP TO AND INCLUDING THE MOST RECENT DEMAND. FOR DEFENDING PARTIES THAT ARE BUSINESS ENTITIES, THE REPRESENTATIVE APPEARING IN-PERSON MUST HAVE AUTHORITY UP TO AND INCLUDING THE MOST RECENT DEMAND. IF BUSINESS ENTITY HAS AFFIRMATIVE CLAIMS, THE REPRESENTATIVE APPEARING IN PERSON MUST HAVE AUTHORITY TO LOWER THEIR DEMAND AT THE FINAL PRETRIAL. COUNSEL OF RECORD, CLIENT AND/OR REPRESENTATIVES' FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN THE COURT SETTING A SHOW CAUSE HEARING. SANCTIONS MAY INCLUDE DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OR JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT. EACH PARTY SHALL SUBMIT A PRETRIAL STATEMENT AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE FINAL PRETRIAL SETTING FORTH THE FOLLOWING: (1) STATEMENT OF FACTS AND LEGAL ISSUES; (2) STATEMENT OF REAL FACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN DISPUTE; (3) STIPULATIONS; (4) LIST OF NON-EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH A BRIEF SUMMARY OF EXPECTED TESTIMONY; (5) LIST OF EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH REPORTS ATTACHED; (6) SPECIAL LEGAL PROBLEMS ANTICIPATED; (7) ESTIMATED LENGTH OF TRIAL; (8) PRETRIAL MOTIONS CONTEMPLATED; (9) SPECIAL EQUIPMENT NEEDS FOR TRIAL. COURTROOM 21D. TRIAL BY JURY SET FOR 02/17/2026 AT 09:00 AM. MOTIONS IN LIMINE ARE DUE 28 DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF TRIAL AND RESPONSES MAY BE SERVED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE MOTIONS. NO REPLY SHALL BE PERMITTED. NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS BEFORE THE TRIAL DATE, THE COURT MUST RECEIVE FROM THE PARTIES AGREED UPON PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS, JURY INTERROGATORIES, JURY VERDICT FORMS, TRIAL BRIEFS, WITNESS LISTS, AND STIPULATIONS. THE PARTIES ARE ALSO TO EXCHANGE PROPOSED EXHIBITS 7 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. PARTIES SHOULD LABEL ALL TRIAL EXHIBITS AND INDICATE ANY JOINT EXHIBITS ACCORDINGLY. PARTIES SHOULD PROVIDE THE COURT WITH COURTESY COPIES OF ALL EXHIBITS ON THE DAY OF THE TRIAL; TRIAL EXHIBITS SHOULD BE CONTAINED IN A BINDER. OBJECTIONS TO TESTIMONIAL DEPOSITIONS THAT REQUIRE RULINGS FROM THE COURT ARE TO BE GIVEN TO THE COURT AT LEAST THREE (3) BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED TRIAL DATE. COUNSEL PROPOSING TO USE THE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY SHALL FILE A BRIEF IN SUPPORT WITHIN TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE OBJECTIONS ARE FILED OR INDICATE AN AGREEMENT TO DELETE THE PORTION FOR WHICH THERE IS AN OBJECTION. THE COURT MUST BE PROVIDED WITH A COMPLETE WRITTEN TRANSCRIPT OF THE DISPUTED DEPOSITIONS. COURTROOM 21D. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT COURT SCHEDULED EVENTS MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT. NOTICE ISSUED
  31. NOTICE FILED BY P1 ARTHUR BENNETT ATTORNEY DANIEL SCOTT KALISH 0063002 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF PROVIDING THE EXECUTED MEDICAL AUTHORIZATIONS TO DEFENSE COUNSEL
  32. MOTION FILED FOR D1 JAZZMIN PARKER ALLISON E. HAYES 0087056 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL MEDICAL AUTHORIZATIONS
  33. SUMS COMPLAINT(57070878) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JAZZMIN PARKER 27001 TREMAINE DR. APT. 108-04 EUCLID, OH 44132 ANSWER DATE: 06/20/2025
  34. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  35. WRIT FEE
  36. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  37. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55951118 RETURNED 02/25/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT PARKER/JAZZMIN/ - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  38. CMC BY PHONE HELD ON 04/16/2025. ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATED THROUGH COUNSEL. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 06/09/2025 AT 10:00 AM. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IS TO INITIATE THE TELEPHONE CALL TO DEFENSE COUNSEL AND THEN CONFERENCE IN THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY AT (216) 443-8581. COUNSEL MAY ALSO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO FACILITATE A CONFERENCE CALL. NOTICE ISSUED
  39. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/16/2025 AT 10:30 AM. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IS TO INITIATE THE TELEPHONE CALL TO DEFENSE COUNSEL AND THEN CONFERENCE IN THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY AT (216) 443-8581. COUNSEL MAY ALSO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO FACILITATE A CONFERENCE CALL. NOTICE ISSUED
  40. ANSWER FILED BY D1 JAZZMIN PARKER ATTORNEY ALLISON E. HAYES 0087056 DEFENDANT TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  41. SUMS COMPLAINT(56328150) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JAZZMIN PARKER 27001 TREMAINE DR. APT. 108-04 EUCLID, OH 44132 ANSWER DATE: 04/07/2025
  42. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  43. WRIT FEE
  44. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  45. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55951118 RETURNED 2/25/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT PARKER/JAZZMIN/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  46. NOTICE FILED BY P1 ARTHUR BENNETT ATTORNEY DANIEL SCOTT KALISH 0063002 NOTICE OF PARTIAL VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL REGARDING DEFENDANT PROGRESSIVE INS. CO, ONLY
  47. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55951119 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/31/2025 PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY PROCESSED BY COC 02/05/2025.
  48. NSF CHECK SCOTT KALISH CO LLC FROM 250 FOR
  49. SUMS COMPLAINT(55951119) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY 6300 WILSON MILLS RD. MAYFIELD VILLAGE, OH 44143
  50. SUMS COMPLAINT(55951118) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JAZZMIN PARKER 27001 TREMAINE DR. APT. 108-04 EUCLID, OH 44132
  51. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  52. WRIT FEE
  53. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  54. WRIT FEE
  55. JUDGE RICHARD A BELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  56. LEGAL RESEARCH
  57. LEGAL NEWS
  58. LEGAL AID
  59. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  60. COMPUTER FEE
  61. CLERK'S FEE
  62. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID SCOTT KALISH CO LLC

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more