Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-23
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 55 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Us Bank National Association As Trustee Successor In Interest To Bank Of America Na As Trustee Sbm To Lasalle Bank Na As Trustee For Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust Mortgage Pass Etc
Defendant Unk Heirs At Law Devisees Legatees Administrators And Executors Of The Estate Of Evelyn Spencer Deceased|Raymond Carr|Jane Or John Doe Unk. Spouse If Any Of Raymond Carr|Peoples Choice Home Loan Inc
Photo of Hon. Andrew J Santoli

Judge

Hon. Andrew J Santoli

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  2. PROOF OF PUBLICATION FILED $958.30 - LEGAL NEWS FEE $250.00
  3. PRE-PAID PORTION OF SERVICE PUBLICATION FEE $708.30
  4. THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT THE PLAINTIFF'S COSTS. FINAL. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). NOTICE ISSUED
  5. NOTICE FILED BY P1 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE ATTORNEY TED A HUMBERT 0022307 PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
  6. LEGAL NEWS ABSTRACT
  7. PROOF OF PUBLICATION FILED $934.75 - LEGAL NEWS FEE $250.00
  8. PRE-PAID PORTION OF SERVICE PUBLICATION FEE $684.75
  9. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TED A HUMBERT
  10. AFFIDAVIT SERVICE BY PUBLICATION, FORECLOSURE $250 AFFIDAVIT FOR SERVICE BY PUBLICATION
  11. REGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 57826256 RETURNED 08/28/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT PEOPLES CHOICE HOME LOAN INC ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  12. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TED A HUMBERT
  13. AFFIDAVIT SERVICE BY PUBLICATION, FORECLOSURE $250 AFFIDAVIT FOR SERVICE PUBLICATION
  14. SUMS COMPLAINT(57826427) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: RAYMOND CARR 10900 GARFIELD AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44108 ANSWER DATE: 09/10/2025
  15. SUMS COMPLAINT(57826256) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: PEOPLES CHOICE HOME LOAN INC 7515 IRVINE CENTER DRIVE IRVINE, CA 92618 ANSWER DATE: 09/10/2025
  16. SUMS COMPLAINT(57826255) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JANE OR JOHN DOE UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF RAYMOND CARR 10900 GARFIELD AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44108 ANSWER DATE: 09/10/2025
  17. SUMS COMPLAINT(57826254) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNK HEIRS AT LAW DEVISEES LEGATEES ADMINISTRATORS AND 10900 GARFIELD AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44108 ANSWER DATE: 09/10/2025
  18. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. WRIT FEE
  20. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  21. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. WRIT FEE
  23. WRIT FEE
  24. WRIT FEE
  25. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  26. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR ORDINARY MAIL
  27. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55937771 RETURNED 3/3/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT PEOPLES CHOICE HOME LOAN INC - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  28. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55937769 RETURNED 2/24/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT CARR/RAYMOND/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  29. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55937768 RETURNED 2/24/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK HEIRS AT LAW DEVISEES LEGATEES ADMINISTRATORS AND - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  30. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55937770 RETURNED 2/24/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE OR JOHN DOE UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF RAYMOND CARR - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  31. PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 4(E) AND THE COURT'S STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE, PLAINTIFF MUST PERFECT SERVICE ON ITS COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 06/23/2025 OR SHOW CAUSE WHY IT HAS FAILED TO DO SO. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  32. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  33. MAGISTRATE PAUL LUCAS ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  34. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  35. SUMS COMPLAINT(55937771) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: PEOPLES CHOICE HOME LOAN INC 7515 IRVINE CENTER DRIVE IRVINE, CA 92618
  36. SUMS COMPLAINT(55937770) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE OR JOHN DOE UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF RAYMOND CARR 10900 GARFIELD AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44108
  37. SUMS COMPLAINT(55937769) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RAYMOND CARR 10900 GARFIELD AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44108
  38. SUMS COMPLAINT(55937768) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK HEIRS AT LAW DEVISEES LEGATEES ADMINISTRATORS AND 10900 GARFIELD AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44108
  39. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  40. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  41. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  42. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  43. WRIT FEE
  44. WRIT FEE
  45. WRIT FEE
  46. WRIT FEE
  47. JUDGE ANDREW J. SANTOLI ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  48. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  49. LEGAL RESEARCH
  50. LEGAL NEWS
  51. LEGAL AID
  52. COMPUTER FEE
  53. CLERK'S FEE
  54. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TED A HUMBERT
  55. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TED A HUMBERT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more