Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-23
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 27 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant Christopher Lavdas
Photo of Hon. PETER J CORRIGAN

Judge

Hon. PETER J CORRIGAN

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57070451) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CHRISTOPHER LAVDAS 26910 BAGLEY RD OLMSTED TWP, OH 44138
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57070450) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ALEXANDER WEINBERG [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57070449) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ALEXANDER WEINBERG [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57070448) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID A HEAD [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57070447) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID A HEAD [email protected]
  7. CASE CALLED FOR DEFAULT HEARING. PLAINTIFF APPEARED, DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR. THE COURT FINDS THAT PROPER SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND THAT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED UNDER CIV.R. 12. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 55, DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE RENDERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANT,CHRISTOPHER LAVDAS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,488.71, PLUS INTEREST AT THE STATUTORY RATE FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT, PLUS COSTS OF THIS ACTION. FINAL. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. NOTICE FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY DAVID A HEAD 0075201 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION
  9. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY DAVID A HEAD 0075201 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
  10. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  11. CMC BY PHONE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 04/17/2025 AT 01:30 PM HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED AS A DEFAULT HEARING ON 05/20/2025 AT 02:15 PM. THE DEFAULT HEARING SHALL BE HELD BY PHONE. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IS REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT BY PHONE. ALL PARTIES SHALL CONTACT THE COURT AT 216-443-8589 AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES OF THE DATE, TIME AND COURT PHONE NUMBER. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL MUST FILE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS 5 DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING: AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES AND MILITARY SERVICE, A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY, AND A COPY OF THE CORRESPONDENCE SENT BY PLAINTIFF NOTIFYING THE DEFENDANT OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE HEARING VIA CERTIFIED MAIL TO BE SENT NO LATER THAN SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING.THE FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE AFOREMENTIONED DOCUMENTS 5 DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING DATE MAY RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(B). FAILURE OF DEFENDANT(S) TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED AGAINST THEM. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 04/17/2025 AT 01:30 PM IS CANCELLED. JUDGE: PETER J CORRIGAN (344) REASON: PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE DEFAULT MOTION WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THIS ENTRY. (notice sent).
  13. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR LAVDAS/CHRISTOPHER/ 03/24/2025 17:01:57
  14. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR WEINBERG/ALEXANDER/ 03/24/2025 17:01:57
  15. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/17/2025 AT 01:30 PM. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO INITIATE CONFERENCE CALL AND CONTACT THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY AT 216-443-8589 ONCE ALL COUNSEL ARE ON THE LINE. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE AND BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE PARTICIPATE VIA PHONE. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROPERLY SCHEDULED PHONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED.
  16. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55934536 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/31/2025 LAVDAS/CHRISTOPHER/ PROCESSED BY COC 02/05/2025.
  17. SUMS COMPLAINT(55934536) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CHRISTOPHER LAVDAS 26910 BAGLEY RD OLMSTED TWP, OH 44138
  18. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. WRIT FEE
  20. JUDGE PETER J CORRIGAN ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  21. LEGAL RESEARCH
  22. LEGAL NEWS
  23. LEGAL AID
  24. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  25. COMPUTER FEE
  26. CLERK'S FEE
  27. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID ALEXANDER WEINBERG

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more