Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-23
Status INACTIVE
Type Tort M.v. Accident
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Latonya Hobbs|Anthony Hurt
Defendant Corbiyn Martz|Stacy Martz
Photo of Hon. Richard a Bell

Judge

Hon. Richard a Bell

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57860212) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: AMY K. HERMAN [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57860211) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: AMY K. HERMAN [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57860210) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MARCO G BOCCIARELLI [email protected]
  5. PURSUANT TO PARTIES' STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL, FILED 08/14/2025, CASE IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING OR RESOLVING ANY AND ALL LIENS AND/OR SUBROGATION INTERESTS FOR MEDICAL BILLS. NOTWITHSTANDING THIS DISMISSAL, THE COURT RETAINS JURISDICTION OVER THIS CASE FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENFORCING THE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT, INCLUDING THE RESOLUTION OF ANY LIENS. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. STIPULATION FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) CORBIYN MARTZ(D1) and STACY MARTZ(D2) ATTORNEY AMY K. HERMAN 0092204 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
  7. MEDIATION HEARING HELD. THE PARTIES IN THE CAPTIONED CASE HAVE REACHED A SETTLEMENT AND AGREE TO SUBMIT THE DISMISSAL ENTRY WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. MEDIATION SET FOR 07/23/2025 AT 03:00 PM. (Notice Sent).
  9. CMC BY PHONE HELD ON 03/19/2025. ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATED THROUGH COUNSEL. THE COURT SETS THE FOLLOWING LITIGATION SCHEDULE: FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF 06/20/2025. CAPTIONED CASE IS HEREBY REFERRED TO MEDIATION WITH THE COURT MEDIATOR. PARTIES TO MEDIATE ON OR BEFORE 07/18/2025. PLAINTIFFS' EXPERT REPORT DUE 08/15/2025. DEFENDANTS' EXPERT REPORT DUE 09/26/2025. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 10/22/2025 AT 01:30 PM. COUNSEL OF RECORD MUST BE PRESENT. IF THERE IS MORE THAN THE ONE COUNSEL OF RECORD, THE LEAD ATTORNEY MUST BE PRESENT. AT LEAST ONE WEEK BEFORE THE FINAL PRETRIAL, PARTIES SHALL EXCHANGE DEMANDS AND OFFERS. IN ADDITION TO COUNSEL OF RECORD, PARTIES MUST APPEAR IN-PERSON. ALL INDIVIDUALS WITH FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY MUST BE PRESENT AT THE FINAL PRETRIAL. FOR DEFENDING PARTIES WITH INSURANCE, AN INSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE WITH FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY MUST APPEAR IN-PERSON. THE INSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE MUST HAVE AUTHORITY UP TO AND INCLUDING THE MOST RECENT DEMAND. FOR DEFENDING PARTIES THAT ARE BUSINESS ENTITIES, THE REPRESENTATIVE APPEARING IN-PERSON MUST HAVE AUTHORITY UP TO AND INCLUDING THE MOST RECENT DEMAND. IF BUSINESS ENTITY HAS AFFIRMATIVE CLAIMS, THE REPRESENTATIVE APPEARING IN PERSON MUST HAVE AUTHORITY TO LOWER THEIR DEMAND AT THE FINAL PRETRIAL. COUNSEL OF RECORD, CLIENT AND/OR REPRESENTATIVES' FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN THE COURT SETTING A SHOW CAUSE HEARING. SANCTIONS MAY INCLUDE DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OR JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT. EACH PARTY SHALL SUBMIT A PRETRIAL STATEMENT AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE FINAL PRETRIAL SETTING FORTH THE FOLLOWING: (1) STATEMENT OF FACTS AND LEGAL ISSUES; (2) STATEMENT OF REAL FACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN DISPUTE; (3) STIPULATIONS; (4) LIST OF NON-EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH A BRIEF SUMMARY OF EXPECTED TESTIMONY; (5) LIST OF EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH REPORTS ATTACHED; (6) SPECIAL LEGAL PROBLEMS ANTICIPATED; (7) ESTIMATED LENGTH OF TRIAL; (8) PRETRIAL MOTIONS CONTEMPLATED; (9) SPECIAL EQUIPMENT NEEDS FOR TRIAL. COURTROOM 21D. TRIAL BY JURY SET FOR 12/01/2025 AT 09:00 AM. MOTIONS IN LIMINE ARE DUE 28 DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF TRIAL AND RESPONSES MAY BE SERVED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE MOTIONS. NO REPLY SHALL BE PERMITTED. NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS BEFORE THE TRIAL DATE, THE COURT MUST RECEIVE FROM THE PARTIES AGREED UPON PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS, JURY INTERROGATORIES, JURY VERDICT FORMS, TRIAL BRIEFS, WITNESS LISTS, AND STIPULATIONS. THE PARTIES ARE ALSO TO EXCHANGE PROPOSED EXHIBITS 7 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. PARTIES SHOULD LABEL ALL TRIAL EXHIBITS AND INDICATE ANY JOINT EXHIBITS ACCORDINGLY. PARTIES SHOULD PROVIDE THE COURT WITH COURTESY COPIES OF ALL EXHIBITS ON THE DAY OF THE TRIAL; TRIAL EXHIBITS SHOULD BE CONTAINED IN A BINDER. OBJECTIONS TO TESTIMONIAL DEPOSITIONS THAT REQUIRE RULINGS FROM THE COURT ARE TO BE GIVEN TO THE COURT AT LEAST THREE (3) BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED TRIAL DATE. COUNSEL PROPOSING TO USE THE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY SHALL FILE A BRIEF IN SUPPORT WITHIN TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE OBJECTIONS ARE FILED OR INDICATE AN AGREEMENT TO DELETE THE PORTION FOR WHICH THERE IS AN OBJECTION. THE COURT MUST BE PROVIDED WITH A COMPLETE WRITTEN TRANSCRIPT OF THE DISPUTED DEPOSITIONS. COURTROOM 21D. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT COURT SCHEDULED EVENTS MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY PLAINTIFF(S) LATONYA HOBBS(P1) and ANTHONY HURT(P2) ATTORNEY MARCO G BOCCIARELLI 0076617 INITIAL DISCLOSURES OF PLAINTIFFS
  11. ANSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) CORBIYN MARTZ(D1) and STACY MARTZ(D2) ATTORNEY AMY K. HERMAN 0092204 ANSWER OF CORBYN MARTZ AND STACY MARTZ
  12. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 03/19/2025 AT 09:30 AM. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IS TO INITIATE THE TELEPHONE CALL TO DEFENDANT AND THEN CONFERENCE IN THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY AT (216) 443-8581. IF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IS NOT IN POSSESSION OF DEFENDANT'S PHONE NUMBER, PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT MUST CONTACT THE COURT, ON THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME AT (216) 443-8581. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL SEND WRITTEN NOTICE OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE CONFERENCE CALL TO ANY PRO SE LITIGANTS. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55927785 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/14/2025 MARTZ/CORBIYN/ PROCESSED BY COC 02/19/2025.
  14. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55927786 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/14/2025 MARTZ/STACY/ PROCESSED BY COC 02/19/2025.
  15. SUMS COMPLAINT(55927786) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STACY MARTZ 156 ATTERBURY BLVD. HUDSON, OH 44236
  16. SUMS COMPLAINT(55927785) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CORBIYN MARTZ 156 ATTERBURY BLVD. HUDSON, OH 44236
  17. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  18. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. WRIT FEE
  20. WRIT FEE
  21. JUDGE RICHARD A BELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  22. LEGAL RESEARCH
  23. LEGAL NEWS
  24. LEGAL AID
  25. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  26. COMPUTER FEE
  27. CLERK'S FEE
  28. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID MARCO G BOCCIARELLI

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase