Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Litchfield County

Court

Litchfield County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-23
Type T 90 Torts All Other
Docket 20 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Keith Percoski
Defendant Mark Vi Inc.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION RESULT: BY THE PLAINTIFF
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 3/14/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  6. ORDER RESULT: Granted 3/14/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  7. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  8. REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE
  9. ORDER RESULT: Order 5/27/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  10. SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Accepted 6/10/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  11. ORDER RESULT: Accepted 6/10/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  12. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  13. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendent's Interrogatories
  14. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RE Requests for Admission RESULT: Denied 10/22/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  15. ORDER RESULT: Denied 10/22/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  16. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Objection To Plaintiff's Motion For Extension Of Time To Respond To Request s For Admissions
  17. ANSWER AND/OR OBJECTIONS TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS PB 13-23(a)
  18. OFFER OF COMPROMISE Defendant's Offer Of Compromise
  19. ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER OF COMPROMISE re: DN 111
  20. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more