Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-19
Type Cc Dissolution W/ Children
Docket 18 entries
Disposition tried by court-civil

Parties

Plaintiff Dais, Laura|Robertson, Daren S
Defendant Davis, Walter Sr|Mccormick, Jeffrey D
Photo of Hon. Scherer, Jason M

Judge

Hon. Scherer, Jason M

Dunklin County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. Tried by Court-Civil PETITIONER APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY DAREN ROBERTSON; RESPONDENT APPEARS BY ATTORNEY JEFFREY MCCORMICK; EVIDENCE ADDUCED; MARRIAGE IS IRRETRIEVABLY BROKEN AND IS ORDERED DISSOLVED; RESIDENCE IS AWARDED TO RESPONDENT; RESPONDENT WILL MAKE SINGLE PAYMENT TO PETITIONER OF $1000.00 WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THIS JUDGMENT; PETITIONER IS AWARDED THE NISSAN ARMADA; COURT APPROVES PROPOSED PARENTING PLAN; PARTIES ARE AWARDED JOINT LEGAL AND PHYSICAL CUSTODY OF THE CHILD; NO SPECIFIC CUSTODY SET; NEITHER PARTY REQUESTED CHILD SUPPORT AND NONE WILL BE AWARDED; PETITIONER AWARDED INCOME TAXES FOR EVEN YEARS AND RESPONDENT WILL BE AWARDED ODD NUMBERED YEARS; ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER WILL PREPARE JUDGMENT. Associated Entries: 11/15/2024 - Hearing Scheduled + Scheduled For: 12/04/2024; 1:00 PM; JASON M SCHERER; Dunklin
  3. Hearing Scheduled ATTORNEYS AND LITIGANTS MAY APPEAR IN PERSON (COURTROOM B) OR VIRTUALLY BY WEBEX USING THE VIRTUAL COURTROOM LINK (https://mocourts.webex.com/meet/jason.scherer). LITIGANTS OR WITNESSES USING THE VIRTUAL COURTROOM LINK ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THEIR VIDEO TURNED ON. LITIGANTS WITH ATTORNEYS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR ATTORNEY AS TO WHETHER TO APPEAR VIRTUALLY. THE VIRTUAL COURTROOM LINK CAN ALSO BE FOUND ON THE "SCHEDULED HEARINGS & TRIALS" TAB ON CASE.NET. Associated Entries: 12/05/2024 - Tried by Court-Civil + Scheduled For: 12/04/2024; 1:00 PM; JASON M SCHERER; Dunklin
  4. Hearing Held PETITIONER APPEARS BY ATTORNEY DAREN ROBERTSON; RESPONDENT APPEARS BY ATTORNEY JEFFREY MCCORMICK; HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12-04-2024 AT 1:00 PM Associated Entries: 10/23/2024 - Motion Hearing Scheduled + Scheduled For: 11/13/2024; 9:00 AM; JASON M SCHERER; Dunklin
  5. Motion Hearing Scheduled ATTORNEYS AND LITIGANTS MAY APPEAR IN PERSON (COURTROOM B) OR VIRTUALLY BY WEBEX USING THE VIRTUAL COURTROOM LINK (https://mocourts.webex.com/meet/jason.scherer). LITIGANTS OR WITNESSES USING THE VIRTUAL COURTROOM LINK ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THEIR VIDEO TURNED ON. LITIGANTS WITH ATTORNEYS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR ATTORNEY AS TO WHETHER TO APPEAR VIRTUALLY. THE VIRTUAL COURTROOM LINK CAN ALSO BE FOUND ON THE "SCHEDULED HEARINGS & TRIALS" TAB ON CASE.NET. Associated Entries: 11/13/2024 - Hearing Held + Scheduled For: 11/13/2024; 9:00 AM; JASON M SCHERER; Dunklin
  6. Notice of Hearing Filed Notice of Hearing 10-23-2024. Filed By: DAREN S ROBERTSON On Behalf Of: LAURA DAVIS
  7. Motion Filed Motion for Mediation 10-23-2024. Filed By: DAREN S ROBERTSON On Behalf Of: LAURA DAVIS
  8. Answer Filed Answer; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JEFFREY D MCCORMICK On Behalf Of: WALTER DAVIS SR
  9. Summons Personally Served Document ID - 24-SM32-51; Served To - DAVIS, WALTER; Server - SEMO PROCESS SERVICE; Served Date - 22-SEP-24; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Special Process Server; Reason Description - Served
  10. Notice of Service Notice of Service 9-26-24. Filed By: DAREN S ROBERTSON On Behalf Of: LAURA DAVIS
  11. Summons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 24-SM32-51, for DAVIS, WALTER.
  12. Order - Special Process Server Associated Entries: 09/19/2024 - Motion Special Process Server +
  13. Filing Info Sheet eFiling
  14. Certificate of Dissolution Certificate of Dissolution of Marriage. On Behalf Of: LAURA DAVIS
  15. Confid Dom Rel Info File Sheet Confidential Case Filing Information Sheet. On Behalf Of: LAURA DAVIS
  16. Motion Special Process Server Motion for Special Process Server 9-19-24. On Behalf Of: LAURA DAVIS Associated Entries: 09/20/2024 - Order - Special Process Server
  17. Parenting Plan Filed Parenting Plan 9-19-24. On Behalf Of: LAURA DAVIS
  18. CRIFS/Unredacted Document CRIFS - Petition for Dissolution of Marriage; Petition for Dissolution of Marriage 9-19-24 in associated to Dissolution filed on 09/19/2024. On Behalf Of: LAURA DAVIS Associated Entries: 09/19/2024 - Petition Filed - Domestic Rel +

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more