Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-09
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 83 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Pic Fund I Llc
Defendant Prop 4 Llc|Michael Ammann|Genesis Construction Group Corporation|Unknown Tenants|Cuyahoga County Fiscal Office
Photo of Hon. Kelly Ann Gallagher

Judge

Hon. Kelly Ann Gallagher

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58745066) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNKNOWN TENANTS 3575 GRIDLEY ROAD SHAKER HEIGHTS, OH 44122
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58745065) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: GENESIS CONSTRUCTION GROUP CORPORATION IGOR ABRAMOVSKY, STATUTORY AGENT 150 ROSEBURY COURT MAYFIELD HEIGHTS, OH 44124
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58745064) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: PROP4 LLC REGISTERED AGENTS, INC., STAT. AGT. 6545 MARKET AVENUE, NORTH, #100 NORTH CANTON, OH 44720
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58745063) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL AMMANN [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58745062) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SEAN BURKE [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58745061) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUDITH MILES [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58745060) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRIAN J GREEN [email protected]
  9. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58745059) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRIAN J GREEN [email protected]
  10. PURSUANT TO THE NOTICE OF DISMISSAL FILED HEREIN, THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF'S COSTS. FINAL COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. NOTICE FILED BY P1 PIC FUND I LLC ATTORNEY BRIAN J GREEN 0063921 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
  12. STIPULATION FILED BY P1 PIC FUND I LLC ATTORNEY BRIAN J GREEN 0063921 STIPULATION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL
  13. THE MOTION OF MARK F. CRAIG TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS PROP4 LLC AND MICHAEL P. AMMANN IS GRANTED. THE CLERK IS ORDERED TO REMOVE MARK F. CRAIG AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR DEFENDANTS PROP4 LLC AND MICHAEL P. AMMANN. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED DEFENDANT MICHAEL AMMANN'S MOTION TO DISMISS, FILED 03/09/2025, IS DENIED. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. DEFENDANT/CROSS-CLAIMANT MICHAEL AMMANN'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT GENESIS CONSTRUCTION, LLC IS DENIED. IN REVIEWING THE CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST GENESIS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, THE MAGISTRATE DOES NOT FIND THAT DEFENDANT HAS ADEQUATELY ASSERTED A CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT GENESIS CONSTRUCTION, LLC. DEFENDANT MICHAEL AMMANN INDICATES HE IS SEEKING RELIEF PURSUANT TO R.C. 1311.11. THIS SECTION OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE DOES NOT OUTLINE A CAUSE FOR RELIEF, BUT RATHER THE PROCEDURE TO EITHER VOID A LIEN OR "BOND OUT" THE LIEN. THE MAGISTRATE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT A PARTY NEED NOT FULLY LABEL AND LAY OUT THE BASIS FOR THEIR CLAIMS, BUT MUST DETERMINE IF "THE ALLEGATIONS PROVIDE FOR RELIEF ON ANY POSSIBLE THEORY." ROGERS V. TARGOT TELEMARKETING SERVICES, 70 OHIO APP.3D 689, 692, 591 N.E.2D 1332 (INTERNAL CITATIONS OMITTED). "THE ALLEGATIONS MUST BE EXAMINED TO DETERMINE IF THEY SUPPORT ANY BASIS FOR RECOVERY, EVEN ON LEGAL THEORIES NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED." PRITCHARD V. ALGIS SIRVATIS & ASSOC., 2006-OHIO-3153, 21. WHILE THE CROSS-CLAIM MAY CONTAIN A LEGAL THEORY UPON WHICH DEFENDANT MICHAEL AMMANN COULD SEEK RELIEF, THESE LEGAL THEORIES REQUIRE SPECIFIC PLEADINGS, WHICH ARE NOT CONTAINED IN THE CROSS-CLAIM. ADDITIONALLY, THE MAGISTRATE COULD NOT GRANT JUDMENT IN FAVOR OF MICHAEL AMMANN ON HIS CROSS-CLAIM AS THE DOCUMENT UPON WHICH HIS CAUSE OF ACTION IS BASED, A MECHANICS LIEN, DOES NOT APPEAR IN THE RECORD. FOR ALL OF THESE REASONS THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS DENIED. THE MAGISTRATE WILL SET THIS MATTER FOR A CMC AND EVENTUALLY A FINAL PRETRIAL AND BENCH TRIAL BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE ON THE CROSS-CLAIMS. THE COURT WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO AMEND THE CROSS-CLAIM AND COUNTERCLAIM. SHOULD DEFENDANT MICHAEL AMMANN SEEK LEAVE TO AMEND HIS CROSS-CLAIM AND COUNTERCLAIM, HE SHOULD TAKE NOTICE THAT HE MAY ONLY FILE CLAIMS AGAINST PARTIES IN THIS MATTER OR TAKE EFFORTS TO ADD ANY ADDITIONAL PARTY HE MAY HAVE CLAIMS AGAINST. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. DEFENDANT PROP4 LLC'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIEM TO PLEAD, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. THE MOVING DEFENDANT IS GRANTED LEAVE UP TO AND INCLUDING MAY 23, 2025, TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. NOTICE ISSUED
  17. MOTION FILED FOR D2 MICHAEL AMMANN PRO SE 9999999 MOTION FOR CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT GENESIS CONSTRUCTION GROUP ON CROSS-CLAIM
  18. REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIM FILED P1 PIC FUND I LLC, ATTORNEY BRIAN J GREEN 0063921 ANSWER OF PIC FUND I LLC REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIM OF MICHAEL AMMANN
  19. NOTICE FILED BY D2 MICHAEL AMMANN ATTORNEY PRO SE 9999999 NOTICE OF PARTIAL SETTLEMENT
  20. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY P1 PIC FUND I LLC BRIAN J GREEN 0063921 PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
  21. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION OF DEFENDANT PROP4 LLC FOR SECOND EXTENSION TO PLEAD, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
  22. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56240595 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/06/2025 AMMANN/MICHAEL/ PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  23. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID PRO SE
  24. ANSWER, CROSSCLAIM & COUNTERCLAIM $150 DEFENDANT MICHAEL AMMANN'S ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM, AND CROSS-CLAIM
  25. SUMS COMPLAINT(56327328) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: UNKNOWN TENANTS 3575 GRIDLEY ROAD SHAKER HEIGHTS, OH 44122
  26. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. WRIT FEE
  28. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED DEFENDANT MICHAEL AMMANN'S MOTION TO DISMISS
  29. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS PROP4 LLC AND MICHAEL P. AMMANN
  30. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE OF COMPLAINT
  31. CUYAHOGA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT SERVICE FEE $64.00
  32. 03/05/2025 56237062 THE WITHIN NAMED UNKNOWN TENANTS 03/04/2025 SHERIFF DEPUTY SERV. FAILURE OF SERVICE..
  33. SUMS COMPLAINT(56240595) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MICHAEL AMMANN 1309 COFFEEN AVENUE #1200 SHERIDAN, WY 82801-0000
  34. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  35. WRIT FEE
  36. SHERIFF SERVICE PACKET
  37. SUMS COMPLAINT(56237062) SENT BY CUYAHOGA SHERIFF SERVICE. TO: UNKNOWN TENANTS 3575 GRIDLEY ROAD SHAKER HEIGHTS, OH 44122
  38. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  39. WRIT FEE
  40. REQUEST OF SERVICE THROUGH THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE OF COMPLAINT & PJR
  41. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE OF COMPLAINT AND NOTICE OF PJR
  42. ANSWER FILED BY D5 CUYAHOGA COUNTY FISCAL OFFICE ATTORNEY JUDITH MILES 0081006 CUYAHOGA COUNTY TREASURER
  43. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55883597 RETURNED 02/05/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNKNOWN TENANTS - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  44. STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD FILED STIPULATION FOR LEAVE OF DEFENDANTS PROP4 LLC AND MICHAEL P. AMMANN TO PLEAD, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
  45. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55883597 RETURNED 2/5/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNKNOWN TENANTS - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  46. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55799125 RETURNED 01/22/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AMMANN/MICHAEL/ - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  47. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55799127 RETURNED 01/15/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNKNOWN TENANTS - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  48. CLERK ISSUED VIA HAND DELIVERY RETURNED 01/24/2025 - CUYAHOGA COUNTY FISCAL OFFICE - COMPLETED 01/24/2025 0.00
  49. SUMS COMPLAINT(55883597) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNKNOWN TENANTS 3575 GRIDLEY ROAD SHAKER HEIGHTS, OH 44122
  50. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55799126 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/15/2025 GENESIS CONSTRUCTION GROUP CORPORATION PROCESSED BY COC 01/22/2025.
  51. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55799125 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/16/2025 AMMANN/MICHAEL/ PROCESSED BY COC 01/22/2025.
  52. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55799124 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/15/2025 PROP4 LLC PROCESSED BY COC 01/22/2025.
  53. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  54. WRIT FEE
  55. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE OF COMPLAINT & PJR
  56. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55799127 RETURNED 1/15/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNKNOWN TENANTS - VACANT NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  57. SUMS COMPLAINT(55799127) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNKNOWN TENANTS 3575 GRIDLEY ROAD SHAKER HEIGHTS, OH 44122
  58. SUMS COMPLAINT(55799126) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: GENESIS CONSTRUCTION GROUP CORPORATION IGOR ABRAMOVSKY, STATUTORY AGENT 150 ROSEBURY COURT MAYFIELD HEIGHTS, OH 44124
  59. SUMS COMPLAINT(55799125) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MICHAEL AMMANN 87 INDIAN LAKE ROAD PUTNAM VALLEY, NY 10579
  60. SUMS COMPLAINT(55799124) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: PROP4 LLC REGISTERED AGENTS, INC., STAT. AGT. 6545 MARKET AVENUE, NORTH, #100 NORTH CANTON, OH 44720
  61. SUMS COMPLAINT(55799128) SENT BY CLERK ISSUED VIA HAND DELIVERY. TO: CUYAHOGA COUNTY FISCAL OFFICE 2079 EAST NINTH STREET SUITE 3 CLEVELAND, OH 44115
  62. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  63. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  64. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  65. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  66. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  67. WRIT FEE
  68. WRIT FEE
  69. WRIT FEE
  70. WRIT FEE
  71. WRIT FEE
  72. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  73. MAGISTRATE BRIAN S GOZELANCZYK ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  74. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  75. JUDGE KELLY ANN GALLAGHER ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  76. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  77. LEGAL RESEARCH
  78. LEGAL NEWS
  79. LEGAL AID
  80. COMPUTER FEE
  81. CLERK'S FEE
  82. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID BRIAN J GREEN
  83. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID BRIAN J GREEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.