Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Litchfield County

Court

Litchfield County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-16
Type P 10 Property Partition
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Carrie Picard
Defendant Jeffrey Lyden

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. LIS PENDENS
  6. RETURN OF SERVICE
  7. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 4/3/2025 BY THE CLERK
  8. ORDER RESULT: Denied 4/3/2025 BY THE CLERK
  9. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 4/14/2025 BY THE CLERK
  10. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/14/2025 BY THE CLERK
  11. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF PARTITION BY SALE
  12. ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM
  13. ORDER RESULT: Order 5/28/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  14. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 7/15/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  15. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/15/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  16. MOTION FOR ORDER MOTION FOR INSPECTION OF PREMISES
  17. ORDER RESULT: Off 9/17/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  18. MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO AMEND MOTION OR PLEADING MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIM
  19. AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM
  20. OBJECTION to Motion for Order
  21. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 9/30/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  22. ORDER RESULT: Granted 9/30/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  23. APPRAISAL
  24. OATH OF APPRAISERS
  25. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 10/14/2025 BY THE CLERK
  26. ORDER RESULT: Denied 10/14/2025 BY THE CLERK
  27. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  28. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/23/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more