Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-05
Status INACTIVE
Type Workmans Comp. Adm. Appeal
Docket 47 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Cheryl Woods
Defendant Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority|Bureau Of Workers' Compensation John Logue, Administrator
Photo of Hon. Ashley Kilbane

Judge

Hon. Ashley Kilbane

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. COURT REPORTER FEE
  3. MOTION IN LIMINE DEFENDANT GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY'S MOTION IN LIMINE PRECLUDING PLAINTIFF FROM OFFERING NON-EXPERT MEDICAL TESTIMONY AND STATEMENTS BY ANY NON-TESTIFYING PHYSICIANS ABOUT HER ALLEGED INJURY
  4. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY D1 GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATTORNEY KEITH A GANTHER 0022413 DEFENDANT GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY'S SPECIAL REQUESTS TO CHARGE THE JURY
  5. BRIEF FILED BY D1 GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY KEITH A GANTHER 0022413 DEFENDANT GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY'S TRIAL BRIEF, WITNESS LIST AND PROPOSED EXHIBIT LIST
  6. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 CHERYL WOODS ATTORNEY STACY M. STEFANIK 0086181 PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT LIST
  7. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 CHERYL WOODS ATTORNEY STACY M. STEFANIK 0086181 PLAINTIFF'S WITNESS LIST
  8. BRIEF FILED BY P1 CHERYL WOODS STACY M. STEFANIK 0086181 TRIAL BRIEF
  9. ATTORNEY CONFERENCE SET FOR 12/16/2025 AT 01:00 PM. (Notice Sent).
  10. ATTORNEY CONFERENCE SET FOR 12/08/2025 AT 04:00 PM. (Notice Sent).
  11. D1 GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE DEFENDANT GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL SCHEDULED ON JANUARY 7, 2026. KEITH A GANTHER 0022413
  12. NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FILED NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  13. DEFENDANT GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF FINAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULED ON DECEMBER 2, 2025, FILED 11/04/2025, IS GRANTED. THE COURT WILL CONTACT COUNSEL WITH PROPOSED DATES FOR RESCHEDULING. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. FINAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 12/02/2025 AT 01:00 PM IS CANCELLED.
  15. D1 GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE DEFENDANT GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF FINAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULED ON DECEMBER 2, 2025. KEITH A GANTHER 0022413
  16. NOTICE OF APPEAL (ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL), FILED NOTICE OF REFILING APPEAL BY GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
  17. CMC BY PHONE HELD ON 04/23/2025. THE PARTIES APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. STATUS OF THE CASE DISCUSSED AND THE FOLLOWING DEADLINES SET: FACT DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY 07/31/2025. IF A DISCOVERY DISPUTE ARISES, THE PARTIES SHALL CONFER TELEPHONICALLY OR IN-PERSON. IF AFTER A GOOD-FAITH ATTEMPT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES A DISPUTE REMAINS, THE PARTIES SHOULD CONTACT THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY BY EMAIL WITH A SUGGESTED DATE AND TIME FOR A ZOOM CONFERENCE WITH THE COURT, AND INCLUDE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ISSUES TO BE DISCUSSED. THEREAFTER, THE COURT MAY ORDER BRIEFING. PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 08/29/2025. DEFENDANT'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 10/17/2025. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 12/02/2025 AT 01:00 PM. THE COURT HOLDS FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCES BY ZOOM, UNLESS THE COURT ORDERS OR THE PARTIES REQUEST AN IN-PERSON FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AT LEAST TWO WEEKS IN ADVANCE. UNLESS ORDERED OTHERWISE, ONLY COUNSEL WILL BE PERMITTED ON THE ZOOM CALL WITH COURT. CLIENTS AND ADJUSTERS MUST BE READILY AVAILABLE TO COUNSEL BY PHONE. THE PARTIES SHALL EACH FILE A FINAL PRETRIAL STATEMENT SEVEN (7) DAYS BEFORE THE FINAL PRETRIAL AND SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: - A BRIEF STATEMENT OF FACTS AND LEGAL ISSUES; - STIPULATIONS; - LIST OF WITNESSES WITH BRIEF SUMMARY OF EXPECTED TESTIMONY; - LIST OF EXHIBITS EXPECTED TO BE USED A TRIAL; - ANY ANTICIPATED UNIQUE LEGAL ISSUES; - AN ESTIMATED LENGTH OF TRIAL; - ANY CONTEMPLATED PRETRIAL MOTIONS; AND - SPECIAL EQUIPMENT OR POTENTIAL LOGISTICAL REQUESTS. THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY WILL EMAIL A ZOOM LINK TO COUNSEL PRIOR TO THE FINAL PRETRIAL. JURY TRIAL SET FOR 01/07/2026 AT 09:00 AM. COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO SUP.R. 41 AND LOC.R. 17 REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL. TRIAL BRIEFS DUE ONE DAY BEFORE TRIAL. DAUBERT MOTIONS CHALLENGING PURPOSED EXPERT TESTIMONY SHALL BE FILED AT LEAST FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. THE PARTY CHALLENGING THE PROPOSED EXPERT TESTIMONY SHALL FILE A COMPLETE COPY OF THE EXPERT'S REPORT(S) AND COMPLETE DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS, IF THE EXPERT WAS DEPOSED. MOTIONS IN LIMINE SHALL BE FILED TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS BEFORE THE START OF TRIAL. RESPONSES DUE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 6(C). NO REPLIES ARE PERMITTED. AFTER THE DEADLINE FOR RESPONSES, COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES SHALL CONFER TO RESOLVE THE MOTIONS IN LIMINE, AND, AT LEAST (3) DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, THE PARTIES SHALL FILE A JOINT NOTICE INFORMING THE COURT WHICH MOTIONS IN LIMINE ARE UNOPPOSED OR RESOLVED, AND WHICH REMAIN OPPOSED. DEPOSITIONS, AUDIOVISUAL OR TRANSCRIPTS, TO BE PROFFERED AT TRIAL. ANY PARTY WISHING TO PROFFER DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AT TRIAL IN LIEU OF THE DEPONENT'S ATTENDANCE SHALL EXCHANGE SUCH DEPOSITION TESTIMONY BY COUNSEL AT LEAST THIRTY (30) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF TRIAL. THE PARTIES SHALL MEET TELEPHONICALLY OR IN PERSON TO DISCUSS ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE PROFFERED TESTIMONY. IF ANY DISPUTES RELATING TO THE TESTIMONY REMAIN AFTER THE GOOD FAITH CONFERENCE, THE PARTIES SHALL SEND HARD COPIES OF THEIR RESPECTIVE DESIGNATIONS WITH OBJECTIONS EITHER ANNOTATED IN THE MARGINS OR OUTLINED IN A SEPARATE DOCUMENT TO THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF TRIAL. THE PARTIES MAY INCLUDE A BRIEF STATEMENT FOR CONTEXT FOR THE OBJECTIONS IF NECESSARY. JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND INTERROGATORIES. PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND JURY INTERROGATORIES ARE DUE SEVEN (7) DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES SHALL CONFER REGARDING JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND INTERROGATORIES IN ORDER TO SUBMIT A JOINT PROPOSED SET OF JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND INTERROGATORIES. IF ANY DISAGREEMENT REMAINS, THE PARTIES SHALL HIGHLIGHT DISAGREEMENTS TO THE COURT. THE PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND INTERROGATORIES SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN MICROSOFT WORD FORMAT TO THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY. FURTHER, THE PARTIES ARE ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT A JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE TO BE READ TO THE JURY. THE PARTIES SHALL ALSO SUBMIT A JOINT LIST OF POTENTIAL WITNESSES AND/OR PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE CASE FOR THE COURT TO INQUIRE FROM POTENTIAL JURORS WHETHER THEY ARE FAMILIAR WITH ANY OF THE LISTED INDIVIDUALS. COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE OHIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, THE LOCAL RULES, THIS COURT'S STANDING CIVIL ORDER, WHICH CAN BE FOUND ON THE COURT'S WEBSITE, AND ANY OTHER ORDERS OF THIS COURT. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY D1 GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATTORNEY KEITH A GANTHER 0022413 DEFENDANT GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY'S INITIAL DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO CIVIL RULE 26(B)(3)
  19. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 CHERYL WOODS ATTORNEY STACY M. STEFANIK 0086181 PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  20. CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 55745218 ADDRESSED TO BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION(D2) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  21. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR STEFANIK/STACY/M. 03/06/2025 17:02:13
  22. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR GANTHER/KEITH/A 03/06/2025 17:02:13
  23. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR NIMRICK/SANDRA/L 03/06/2025 17:02:13
  24. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/23/2025 AT 03:00 PM. PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 21, PART I, THE COURT WILL CONDUCT A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. DISCOVERY SCHEDULE, AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY, EXCHANGE OF EXPERT REPORTS, DATE FOR FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO ARBITRATION, ETC., SHALL BE RESOLVED AND INCLUDED IN A BINDING DECREE AND ORDER FORMALIZED. ALL COUNSEL ATTENDING SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A BINDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER . PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL INITIATE THE CONFERENCE CALL WITH ALL OTHER PARTIES AND CONTACT THE COURT AT THE APPOINTED TIME AT 216-443-8618. PARTIES SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS DISCOVERY PROGRESS AND SCHEDULING MATTERS, ETC. COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES SHALL FOLLOW THE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN CIVIL RULE 26(F) IN PREPARATION FOR THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
  25. ANSWER FILED BY D1 GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATTORNEY KEITH A GANTHER 0022413 SEPARATE ANSWER OF DEFENDANT GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  26. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55804237 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/24/2025 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROCESSED BY COC 01/29/2025.
  27. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55804236 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/17/2025 GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY PROCESSED BY COC 01/22/2025.
  28. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55745217 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/13/2025 GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY PROCESSED BY COC 01/22/2025.
  29. ANSWER FILED BY D2 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION ATTORNEY SANDRA L NIMRICK 0042540 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT, ADMINISTRATOR, BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
  30. COMPLAINT W/ NO SUMS(55804237) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 30 WEST SPRING STREET COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  31. COMPLAINT W/ NO SUMS(55804236) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY 1240 WEST 6TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  32. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  33. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  34. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  35. COMPLAINT W/ NO SUMS(55745218) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 30 WEST SPRING STREET COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  36. COMPLAINT W/ NO SUMS(55745217) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY 1240 WEST 6TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  37. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  38. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  39. JUDGE MAUREEN CLANCY ASSIGNED (RANDOM); RE-FILED CASE, REASSIGNED TO ORIGINAL JUDGE, JUDGE ASHLEY KILBANE
  40. JUDGE MAUREEN CLANCY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  41. LEGAL RESEARCH
  42. LEGAL NEWS
  43. LEGAL AID
  44. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  45. COMPUTER FEE
  46. CLERK'S FEE
  47. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID STACY M. STEFANIK

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more