Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-16
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 29 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant Justin Fuller
Photo of Hon. JOAN SYNENBERG

Judge

Hon. JOAN SYNENBERG

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56856179) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JUSTIN FULLER 3279 WARRENSVILLE CENTER RD APT 16D SHAKER HTS, OH 44122
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56856178) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56856177) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56856176) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SEAN M. WINTERS [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56856175) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SEAN M. WINTERS [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56856174) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRIS K VELAYUDHAN [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56856173) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRIS K VELAYUDHAN [email protected]
  9. CASE CALLED FOR DEFAULT HEARING ON 04/30/2025. PLAINTIFF FAILS TO APPEAR. DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR. UPON REVIEW OF THE DOCKET, PLAINTIFF FAILED TO SEND CORRESPONDENCE TO THE DEFENDANT ADVISING THEM OF THE DATE, TIME, AND CALL-IN INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SCHEDULED DEFAULT HEARING. ACCORDINGLY, AS A RESULT OF PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO APPEAR AND PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO SUBMIT THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS, PURSUANT TO THIS COURT'S PRIOR ORDER DATED 04/10/2025, THIS CASE IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION UNDER CIV. R. 41(B). COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. THE COURT IS IN RECEIPT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 04/08/2025. THE DOCKET REFLECTS THAT SERVICE HAS BEEN PERFECTED, BUT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CIVIL RULES. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 04/30/2025 AT 11:00 AM. THE DEFAULT HEARING SHALL BE HELD BY PHONE. COUNSEL/PRO SE PARTIES TO CALL INTO THE FOLLOWING CONFERENCE LINE AT THE SCHEDULED TIME: DIAL-IN: (720)-527-5947 ACCESS CODE: 5692720# COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES OF THE DATE, TIME AND CONFERENCE CALL DIRECTIONS. BEFORE HEARING DATE, PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES, AN AFFIDAVIT OF MILITARY SERVICE (IF APPLICABLE), A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY, AND A COPY OF THE CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO DEFENDANT ADVISING OF THE DATE, TIME, AND LOCATION OF THE HEARING. NOTIFICATION SHALL BE MADE VIA REGULAR MAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL, TO BE SENT NO LATER THAN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE. FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE AFOREMENTIONED DOCUMENTS ON OR BEFORE THE HEARING DATE MAY RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(B). THE FAILURE OF DEFENDANT(S) TO APPEAR WILL RESULT IN A DEFAULT JUDGMENT. FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(B). NOTICE ISSUED
  11. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY SEAN M. WINTERS 0084612 MILITARY SERVICE AFFIDAVIT
  12. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MDJ PACKAGE 05/14/2025 - UNKNOWN
  13. THE DOCKET REFLECTS GOOD SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AND THAT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO TIMELY FILE AN ANSWER. PLAINTIFF IS TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHIN 60 DAYS OF JOURNALIZATION OF THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(B). NOTICE ISSUED
  14. SUMS COMPLAINT(56112859) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JUSTIN FULLER 3279 WARRENSVILLE CENTER RD APT 16D SHAKER HTS, OH 44122 ANSWER DATE: 03/14/2025
  15. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  16. WRIT FEE
  17. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED VIA REGULAR MAIL
  18. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55866730 RETURNED 2/5/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT FULLER/JUSTIN/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  19. SUMS COMPLAINT(55866730) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JUSTIN FULLER 3279 WARRENSVILLE CENTER RD APT 16D SHAKER HTS, OH 44122
  20. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  21. WRIT FEE
  22. JUDGE JOAN SYNENBERG ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  23. LEGAL RESEARCH
  24. LEGAL NEWS
  25. LEGAL AID
  26. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  27. COMPUTER FEE
  28. CLERK'S FEE
  29. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more