Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-16
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 33 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant Mikayla A. Rogers Jones

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56713064) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MIKAYLA A. ROGERS JONES 3635 ROLLISTON RD SHAKER HTS, OH 44120
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56713063) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56713062) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56713061) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SEAN M. WINTERS [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56713060) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SEAN M. WINTERS [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56713059) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRIS K VELAYUDHAN [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56713058) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRIS K VELAYUDHAN [email protected]
  9. CASE CALLED FOR CMC BY PHONE ON 04/15/2025. PLAINTIFF FAILED TO APPEAR. COUNSEL HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER, DATED 02/20/2025, WHICH READ, "FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR FOR THIS CMC WILL RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE." THEREFORE, THIS CASE IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. FINAL. SO ORDERED. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56313498 RETURNED 03/22/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ROGERS JONES/MIKAYLA /A. - INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  11. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56313498 RETURNED 3/22/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ROGERS JONES/MIKAYLA /A. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  12. SUMS COMPLAINT(56313498) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MIKAYLA A. ROGERS JONES 446 RICHMOND PARK E. CLEVELAND, OH 44143-0000
  13. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  14. WRIT FEE
  15. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
  16. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR ROGERS JONES/MIKAYLA /A 02/20/2025 17:02:00
  17. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR WINTERS/SEAN/M. 02/20/2025 17:02:00
  18. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR VELAYUDHAN/KRIS/K 02/20/2025 17:02:00
  19. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR MULLEN/DAVID/ 02/20/2025 17:01:59
  20. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/15/2025 AT 09:00 AM. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 978-990-5000 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 701774# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR FOR THIS CMC WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. ANY ATTORNEY OR UNREPRESENTED PARTY WHO IS NOT AVAILABLE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED HIS/HER PARTICIPATION AND TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE CASE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. PRIOR TO THE CMC, PARTIES MUST EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 26(B)(3) AND DRAFT A PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 26(F). COUNSEL SHALL FILE WITH THE COURT THE PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN AND NOTICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE CMC. IF THE PARTIES ARE UNABLE TO CONFER, PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE EVIDENCE WITH THE COURT OF EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT ANY COURT SCHEDULED EVENT IN THE FUTURE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT RENDERED AGAINST DEFENDANT. SO ORDERED.
  21. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55861736 RETURNED 01/25/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ROGERS JONES/MIKAYLA /A - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  22. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55861736 RETURNED 1/25/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ROGERS JONES/MIKAYLA /A - UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  23. SUMS COMPLAINT(55861736) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MIKAYLA A ROGERS JONES 3635 ROLLISTON RD SHAKER HTS, OH 44120
  24. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  25. WRIT FEE
  26. JUDGE CASSANDRA COLLIER-WILLIAMS ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  27. LEGAL RESEARCH
  28. LEGAL NEWS
  29. LEGAL AID
  30. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  31. COMPUTER FEE
  32. CLERK'S FEE
  33. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.